Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does Group CBT for Depression Do What It Says on the Tin? A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Group CBT for Depressed Adults (2000–2016)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to update previous meta-analyses of gCBT, and focus specifically on recent studies in which the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used to assess outcome. PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched for eligible studies. Both randomized controlled trials (RTC, k = 9) and non-RTCs (k = 1) published since 2000 were included. On the BDI large significant effect sizes were found for gCBT compared with treatment as usual (TAU, d = 4.64), wailing list controls (WLC, d = 1.20), and both of these comparison conditions combined with studies of well-defined alternative treatments (ALT, d = 1.61). On the BDI a moderate effect size (d = 0.53) was found for comparisons of gCBT and ALT groups. gCBT also had large and significant effects on depressive cognition assessed with the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire and the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale compared with WLC and ALT comparison groups (d = 2.66). This meta-analysis shows that gCBT is a robust intervention for depression in adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers included in the meta-analysis are marked with ∙

  • American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of the mental disorders, (4th ed.)(DSM –IV-TR). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of the mental disorders, 5th ed.(DSM-5). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ∙ Andersson, G., Hesser, H., Veilord, A., Svedling, L., Anderssoon, F., Sleman, O., Mauritzson, L., Sarkohe, A., Claesson, E., Zetterqvist, V., Lamminen, M., Eriksson, T. & Carlbring, P. (2013). Randomised controlled non-inferiority trial with 3-year follow-up of internet-delivered versus face-to-face group cognitive behavioral therapy for depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 151, 986–994.

  • ∙ Asgharipoor, N., Asgharnejad, F., Arshadi, H., & Sahebi, A. (2012). A comparative study on the effectiveness of positive psychotherapy and group cognitive-behavioral therapy for the patients suffering from major depressive disorder. Iran Journal of Psychiatry Behavioral Science, 6(2), 33–41.

  • ∙ Baker, K., & Neimeyer, R. (2003). Therapist training and client characteristics as predictors of treatment response to group therapy for depression. Psychotherapy Research, 13(2), 135–151.

  • Beck, A., Rush, A., Shaw, B., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A., Steer, R., & Brown, G. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI II). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A., Ward, C., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(6), 561–571.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta analysis, version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ∙ Chiang, K., Chen, T., Hsieh, H., Tsai, J., Ou, K., & Chou, K. (2015). One-year follow-up of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral group therapy for patients’ depression: A randomized, single-blinded, controlled study. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 1–11. doi.10.1155/2015/373149

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., & Warmerdam, L. (2008). Are individual and group treatments equally effective in the treatment of depression in adults? A meta-analysis. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 22, 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ∙ Embling, S. (2002). The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy in depression. Nursing Standard. 17(14–15), 33–41.

  • Endicott, J., Nee, J., Harrison, W., & Blumenthal, R. (1993). Quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire: A new measure. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 29, 321–326.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, C., Chu, H., Chen, C., Chang, Y., Chen, T., Chou, Y., et al. (2012). The effect of cognitive behavioral group therapy for depression: A meta-analysis 2000–2010. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 9(1), 2–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, M. (1988). Quality of life Inventory. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Frisch, M., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M., & Retzlaff, P. (1992). Clinical validation of the quality of life inventory: A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychological Assessment, 4, 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golestanibakht, T. (2007). Wellbeing and happiness model in Tehran. Unpublished Dissertation. Tehran: Alzahra University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans, E., & Hiller, W. (2013). Effectiveness of and dropout from outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adult unipolar depression: A meta-analysis of nonrandomised effectiveness studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(1), 75–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J., & Altman, D. G. (2008). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In J. P. T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.1.0). London: The Cochrane Collaboration. http://handbook.cochrane.org

  • Hollon, S., & Kendall, P. (1980). Cognitive self-statements in depression: Development of an automatic thoughts questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huedo-Medina, T., Sanchez-Meca, J., Marin-Martinez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychological Methods, 11, 193–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, A., Araya, R., & Salisbury, C. (2012). Group psychological therapies for depression in the community: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 200(3), 184–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. (2012). The costs of depression. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 35(1), 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K., & Walters, E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R., de Jonge, P., Shahly, V., van Loo, H., Wang, P., & Wilcox, M. (2014). Epidemiology of depression. In H. Gotlib & C. Hammen (Eds.), Handbook of depression (3rd ed., pp. 7–24). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R., & Wang, P. (2009). Epidemiology of depression. In H. Gotlib & C. Hammen (Eds.), Handbook of depression (2nd ed., pp. 5–22). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D., & Allmann, A. (2014). Course of depression: Persistence and recurrence. In H. Gotlib & C. Hammen (Eds.), Handbook of depression (3rd ed., pp. 64–83). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, T. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • ∙ Muktar, F., & Oei, T. (2011). Predictors of group cognitive behavior therapy outcomes for the treatment of depression in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 4, 125–128.

  • Murray, C., Vos, T., Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Flaxman, A., & Lopez, A. (2012). Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injures in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380, 2197–2223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2009). Depression: The treatment and management of depression in adults (Clinical Guideline 90). London: British Psychological Society and Gaskell. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg90

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2012). Depression: Evidence update 13. A summary of selected new evidence relevant to NICE clinical guideline 90. The treatment and management of depression in adults. London: NICE.

  • Tucker, M., & Oei, T. (2007). Is group more cost effective than individual cognitive behavior therapy? The evidence is not solid yet. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twomey, C., & Byrne, M. (2012). A stepped care approach to mental health. Forum, 29(11), 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, A. (1979). The dysfunctional attitude scale: A validation study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 1389B–1390B. (UMI No. 79–19,533).

  • ∙ Wong, D. (2008a). Cognitive and health-related outcomes of group cognitive behavioral treatment for people with depressive symptoms in Hong Kong: Randomized wait-list control study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 702–711.

  • ∙ Wong, D. (2008b). Cognitive behavioral treatment groups for people with chronic depression in Hong Kong: A randomized wait-list control design. Depression and Anxiety, 25, 142–148.

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • ∙ Zamirinejad, S., Hojjat, S. K., Golzari, M., Borjali, A., & Akaveri, A. (2014). Effectiveness of resilience training versus cognitive therapy on reduction of depression in female Iranian college students. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 35, 480–488.

  • ∙ Zettle, R., Rains, J. C., & Hayes, S. (2011). Processes of change in acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive therapy for depression: A mediation reanalysis of Zettle and Rains. Behavior Modification, 35(3), 265–283.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

    Lucy M. Moore, Alan Carr & Dan Hartnett

Authors
  1. Lucy M. Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan Carr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dan Hartnett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Carr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moore, L.M., Carr, A. & Hartnett, D. Does Group CBT for Depression Do What It Says on the Tin? A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Group CBT for Depressed Adults (2000–2016). J Contemp Psychother 47, 141–152 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-016-9351-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-016-9351-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation