Abstract
Research has shown that college women are at considerable risk for sexual assault by dating partners, and studies have shown early detection of threat risk cues is an important factor in rape avoidance. This study examined how men and women process sexual encounters in a date rape situation and how they differ in interpretation of cues and response decision-making using Crick and Dodge’s (1994) model of social information processing (SIP). Participants listened to an audio vignette depicting a female resisting sexual contact as the male continues to make sexual advances. The vignette was paused at a point in which there is ambiguity concerning the sexual intentions of the actors, and multiple choice/forced answer questions reflecting five stages in social information processing (causal and intent interpretation, goal clarification, response decision, response efficacy, and response evaluation) were administered. Analyses revealed males and females significantly differed in all SIP stages, and emotional reaction was a significant predictor of response decision. Implications of the findings were discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The SES was administered as part of a broader, programmatic effort across studies in this lab to enable examination of sexual aggression/victimization experiences. Unfortunately, due to limited variability the base rate of these behaviors in this sample was such that the resultant power for statistical analyses was minimal. As such, these data were archived pursuant to longer-term data collection that could propel appropriate analyses, and are not mentioned further in the current manuscript
References
Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attribution for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 830–838.
Arsenio, W., & Lemerise, E. (2001). Varieties of childhood bullying: Values, emotion processes, and social compe-tence. Social Development, 10, 59–73.
Arsenio, W. F., & Lemerise, E. (2004). Aggression and moral development: Integrating the social information processing and moral domain models. Child Development, 75, 987–1002.
Arsenio, W. F., Adams, E., & Gold, J. (2009). Social information processing, moral reasoning, and emotion attributions: Relations with adolescents’ reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 80, 1739–1755.
Basow, S. A., & Minieri, A. (2011). “You owe me”: Effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender, and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 479–497.
Brady, E. C., Chrisler, J. C., Hosdale, D. C., & Osowiecki, D. M. (1991). Date rape: Expectations, avoidance strategies, and attitudes toward victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 427–429.
Brener, N. D., McMahon, P. M., Warren, C. W., & Douglas, K. A. (1999). Forced sexual intercourse and associated health-risk behaviors among female college students in the United States. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 252–259.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2010). Criminal victimization in the United States 2007. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Byers, E. S. (1988). Effects of sexual arousal on men’s and women’s behavior in sexual disagreement situations. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 235–254.
Clay-Warner, J. (2002). Avoiding rape: The effects of protective actions and situational factors on rape outcomes. Violence and Victims, 17, 691–705.
Cook, S. L., Gidycz, C. A., Koss, M. P., & Murphy, M. (2011). Emerging issues in the measurement of rape victimization. Violence Against Women, 17, 201–218.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993–1002.
Earnshaw, V. A., Pitpitan, E. V., & Chaudoir, S. R. (2011). Intended responses to rape as functions of attitudes, attributions of fault, and emotions. Sex Roles, 64, 382–393.
Ferguson, C. J., & Dyck, D. (2012). Paradigm change in aggression research: The time is come to retire the General Aggression Model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 220–228.
Finkelson, L., & Oswalt, R. (1995). College date rape: Incidence and reporting. Psychological Reports, 77(2), 526.
Fisher, B. S. (2009). The effects of survey questions wording on rape estimates. Violence Against Women, 15, 133–147.
Frazier, P. A. (1990). Victim Attributions and post-rape trauma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 298–304.
Freedman, J. (2002). Media violence and its effect on aggression. In Assessing the scientific evidence. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Gauntlett, D. (2005). Moving experiences: Understanding television’s influences and effects. Luton: John Libbey.
Gross, A. M., Weed, N. C., & Lawson, G. D. (1998). Magnitude scaling of intensity of sexual refusal behaviors in a date rape. Violence Against Women, 4, 329–343.
Gross, A. M., Winslett, A., Roberts, M., & Gohm, C. L. (2006). An examination of sexual violence against college women. Violence Against Women, 12, 288–300.
Gylys, J. A., & McNamara, J. R. (1996). A further examination of the validity for the Sexual Experiences Survey. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 14, 245–260.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979). Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: Inquiries into depression and rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1798–1809.
Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual Experiences Survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422–423.
Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instruments investigation of sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 50, 455–457.
Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.
Koss, M. P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S., Norris, J., Testa, M., Ullman, S., West, C., & White, J. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 357–370.
Kowalski, R. M. (1993). Inferring sexual interest from behavioral cues: Effects of gender and sexually relevant attitudes. Sex Roles, 29, 13–36.
Lemerise, E. A., & Arsenio, W. F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71, 107–118.
Littleton, H., & Breitkopf, C. R. (2006). Coping with the experience of rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 106–116.
Livingston, J. A., & Testa, M. (2000). Qualitative analysis of women’s perceived vulnerability to sexual aggression in a hypothetical dating context. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 729–741.
Luebbe, A. M., Bell, D. J., Allwood, M. A., Swenson, L. P., & Early, M. C. (2010). Social information processing in children: Specific relations to anxiety, depression, and affect. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 386–399.
Macy, R. J., Nurius, P. S., & Norris, J. (2006). Responding in their best interest. Violence Against Women, 12, 478–500.
Marx, B. P., & Gross, A. M. (1995). Date rape: An analysis of two contextual variables. Behavior Modification, 19, 451–463.
McCaw, J. N., & Senn, C. Y. (1998). Perception of cues in conflictual dating situations. Violence Against Women, 4, 609–624.
Muehlenhard, C. L. (1988). ‘Nice women’ don’t say yes and ‘real men’ don’t say no: How miscommunication and the double standard can cause sexual problems. Women and Therapy, 7, 95–108.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186–196.
Muehlenhard, C. L., Andrews, S. L., & Beal, G. K. (1995). Beyond “just saying no”: Dealing with men’s unwanted sexual advances in heterosexual dating contexts. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8, 141–168.
Nurius, P. S. (2000). Risk perception for acquaintance sexual aggression: A social-cognitive perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1, 63–78.
Nurius, P. S., & Norris, J. (1996). A cognitive ecological model of women’s responses to male sexual coercion in dating. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8, 117–139.
Nurius, P. S., Norris, J., Young, D. S., Graham, T. L., & Gaylord, J. (2000). Interpreting and defensively responding to threat: Examining appraisals and coping with acquaintance sexual aggression. Violence and Victims, 15, 187–208.
Nurius, P. S., Norris, J., Macy, R. J., & Huang, B. (2004). Women’s situational coping with acquaintance sexual assault: Applying an appraisal-based model. Violence Against Women, 10, 450–477.
O’Bryne, R., Rapley, M., & Hansen, S. (2006). ‘You couldn’t say ‘no’, could you?’ Young men’s understandings of sexual refusal. Feminism & Psychology, 16, 133–154.
Ouimette, P. C., Shaw, J., Drozd, F., & Leader, J. (2000). Consistency of reports of rape behaviors amongnonincarcerated men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 1(2), 133–139.
Ross, R. R., & Allgeier, E. R. (1996). Behind the pencil/paper measurement of sexual coercion: Interview-based clarification of men's interpretations of sexual experiences survey items. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(18), 1587–1616.
Savage, J. (2004). Does viewing violent media really cause criminal violence? A methodological review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 99–128.
Testa, M., VanZile-Tamsen, C., Livingston, J. A., & Koss, M. P. (2004). Assessing women’s experiences of sexual aggression using the Sexual Experiences Survey: Evidence for validity and implications for research. Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 29, 345–352.
Ullman, S. E., Townsend, S. M., Filipas, H. H., & Starzynski, L. L. (1997). Structural models of the relations of assault severity, social support, avoidance coping, self-blame, and PTSD among sexual assault survivors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 23–37.
Vanzile-Tamsen, C., Testa, M., & Livingston, J. A. (2005). The impact of sexual assault history and relationship context on appraisal of and response to acquaintance sexual assault risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 813–832.
Winslett, A. H., & Gross, A. M. (2008). Sexual boundaries: An examination of the importance of talking before touching. Violence Against Women, 14, 542–562.
Zoucha-Jensen, J. M., & Coyne, A. (1993). The effects of resistance strategies on rape. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1633–1634.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ambrose, C.E., Gross, A.M. Interpreting Sexual Dating Encounters: Social Information Processing Differences in Men and Women. J Fam Viol 31, 361–370 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9757-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9757-z