Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The power of qualitative data in post-occupancy evaluations of residential high-rise buildings

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a mixed-method, case study research design, the present study explores four Toronto high-rise residential buildings in order to produce feedback about how occupants experience and behave in these buildings. The primary dataset is 700 comments received on 165 questionnaires. Content analysis was performed on the data, identifying envelope, heating, cooling and ventilation (HVAC), hot water, indoor environmental quality, and layout and design as the primary themes. The comments revealed important feedback for the designers and managers of these buildings; including important insights into the HVAC system, envelope, balcony, hot water delivery system, and noise control strategies. Though subjective in nature, the comments received from occupants are revelatory and have implications for the amount of energy consumed by the buildings, as well as the level of occupant satisfaction. Though not a substitute for quantitative problem solving, they are a complimentary strategy in the pursuit to improve the satisfaction and sustainability of the built environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term ‘occupants’ has been used throughout because it is more commonly used in this field of research. However, the author would like to acknowledge that ‘inhabitants’ is useful in indicating (and perhaps eliciting) a person’s integration and stewardship within a building (as per Cole et al. 2008).

References

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE. (2012). Performance measurement protocols for commercial buildings: Best practices guide. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, G. (2010). Sustainable buildings in practice; what the users think. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, G. (2011). Did that building feel good for you? Or—Isn’t it just as important to assess and benchmark users’ perceptions of buildings as it is to audit their energy efficiency? Intelligent Building International, 3, 124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, G., & Dykes, C. (2012). The potential for the use of the occupants’ comments in the analysis and prediction of building performance. Buildings, 2, 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard, S., Berkland, S., & Hoque, S. (2011). Ever-green: A post-occupancy building performance analysis of LEED certified homes in New England. Journal of Green Building, 6(4), 138–145.  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., & Gorgolewski, M. (2015a). Understanding the role of occupants in innovative mechanical ventilation strategies. Building Research & Information, 43(2), 210–221.  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., & Gorgolewski, M. (2015b). Using physical, behavioural, and demographic variables to explain suite-level energy use in multi-residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 89, 308–317.  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Building Use Studies. (2015). BUS occupant survey methodology. Retrieved from http://www.usablebuildings.co.uk/WebGuideOSM/.  

  • Canada Green Building Council. (2013). LEED project profiles. Retrieved from http://www.cagbc.org/leed/projectprofile_EN.aspx.

  • Cole, R., Robinson, J., Brown, Z., & O’Shea, M. (2008). Re-contextualizing the notion of comfort. Building Research & Information, 36(4), 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dykes, C., & Baird, G. (2013). A review of questionnaire-based methods used for assessing and benchmarking indoor environmental quality. Intelligent Buildings International, 5(3), 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London: Sage.  

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Z., Tierney, M., Pegg, I., & Allan, N. (2010). Low-energy dwellings: The contribution of behaviours to actual performance. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 491–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Chandiwala, S. (2010). Understanding occupants: Feedback techniques for large-scale low-carbon domestic refurbishments. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 530–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaman, A., Stevenson, F., & Bordass, B. (2010). Building evaluation: Practice and principles. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 564–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lstiburek, J. (2014). How do building stack up? Retrieved from http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/insights/bsi-075-how-do-buildings-stack-up.

  • McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Gabriola Island, B.C.: New Society Publishers.    

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, M., Stewart, G., & Ord, A. (2011). Reassessing the recent past: Tower neighborhood renewal in Toronto. APT Bulletin, 42(2/3), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J., & Humphreys, M. (2002). Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings. Energy and Buildings, 32(6), 563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (2011). Real world research (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • RDH Building Engineering Ltd. (2013). The importance of slab edge & balcony thermal bridges. Retrieved from http://rdh.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Part-1-The-Importance-of-Slab-Edge-Balcony-Thermal-Bridges.pdf (Accessed February 17, 2015).

  • Sellers, B., & Fiore, S. (2013). Sustainable and user-centered: Applying human factors solutions towards improving the effectiveness of “green” buildings. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 550–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipworth, M., Firth, S., Gentry, M., Wright, A., Shipworth, D., & Lomas, K. (2010). Central heating thermostat settings and timing: Building demographics. Building Research & Information, 38(1), 50–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, A. (Ed.). (2010). Oxford dictionary of English (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, F., & Rijal, H. (2010). Developing occupancy feedback from a prototype to improve housing production. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 549–563.  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straube, J. (2008). Can highly glazed building Façades Be green? (Building Science Corporation). http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/insights/bsi-006-can-fully-glazed-curtainwalls-be-green (Accessed December 17, 2014).

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). Bathroom. http://www.epa.gov/greenhomes/bathroom.htm (Accessed on January 30, 2015).

  • Williamson, T., Soebarto, V., & Radford, A. (2010). Comfort and energy use in five Australian award-winning houses: Regulated, measured and perceived. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 509–529.  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalejska-Jonsson, A. (2012). Evaluation of low-energy and conventional residential buildings from occupants’ perspective. Building and Environment, 58, 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environment Applied Science and Management, Ryerson University, 245 Saint Helens Avenue, Toronto, ON, M6H4A2, Canada

    Craig Brown

Authors
  1. Craig Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, C. The power of qualitative data in post-occupancy evaluations of residential high-rise buildings. J Hous and the Built Environ 31, 605–620 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9481-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9481-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation