Abstract
Time spent with others may be perceived as a limited resource that one can gain or lose or as a nonzero-sum resource that people share and co-create. Is perceiving time as a nonzero-sum resource associated with better life outcomes and how do interpersonal goals shape how one perceives time? What are the predictors of these time perceptions? A sample of 501 Japanese adults completed measures of time perception, compassionate and self-image goals, basic needs satisfaction, subjective well-being, perceived stress, time affluence, and objective time scarcity. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the newly developed time perception scale had four correlated factors: time taken, taking time, offering time, and nonzero-sum time. A structural equation modeling further showed that nonzero-sum time perception was associated with basic needs satisfaction, greater subjective well-being, and lower perceived stress. In contrast, zero-sum time perception (more specifically the perception that one is taking others’ time) was negatively associated with basic needs satisfaction and subjective well-being, and positively with perceived stress. Compassionate goals to support others were associated negatively with zero-sum time perception and positively with nonzeo-sum time perception whereas self-image goals to project a desirable image of the self were correlated with zero-sum time perception and unexpectedly, also with nonzero-sum time perception. This research points to the possibility that perceiving time as nonzero-sum resource rather than a zero-sum resource promotes happiness.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To ensure statistical stability when testing the hypothesized model using structural equation modeling, I followed Kline’s (1998) recommendation that the ratio of the number of participants to the number of model parameters be no less than 5:1. The hypothesized model in Fig. 2 has 108 parameters and the model in Fig. 3 has 105 parameters; thus, the recommended number of participants was 540. Miura and Kobayashi (2015) reported that the average rate for satisfice responses in Japanese survey companies was 13.3% and the survey company advocated that the average response rate was 76%. These numbers suggested that approximately 800 needed to be invited for the second survey.
Time affluence was measured combining items from different scales to ensure high reliability and validity. The 9-item subscale from Kasser and Sheldon’s (2009) Material and Time Affluence Scale had never been validated in Japan. Furukawa et al.’s (1993) subscale was developed in Japan but had only four items (which may result in low reliability) and had no reversed items. The data showed that each of the scales had good reliability (Cronbach alphas were .94 for Kasser and Sheldon’s scale, .83 for Furukawa et al.’s scale, and .71 for the two newly added items) and they positively correlated with each other (rs = .68 to .85). Using either one of the subscale resulted in the same finding as using the composite scale.
The hypothesized model in Fig. 1 was split into two models because the sample size was not large enough to test the full model at once.
Again, self-image goals were associated with greater perception that time is taken away (β = .30, z = 4.42, p < .001) and that one is taking other people’s time (β = .19, z = 2.88, p = .004) whereas compassionate goals were associated with lower perception that time is taken away (β = − .15, z = − 2.26, p = .024) and that one is taking other people’s time (β = − .12, z = − 1.78, p = .075). Offering time to others was positively associated with self-image goals (β = .41, z = 6.57, p < .001), but not with compassionate goals (β = .07, z = 1.15, p = .25). As predicted, nonzero-sum time perception was positively associated with compassionate goals (β = .29, z = 4.51, p < .001) but again, it was also associated with self-image goals (β = .33, z = 5.12, p < .001).
References
Canevello, A., & Crocker, J. (2010). Creating good relationships: Responsiveness, relationship quality, and interpersonal goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018186.
Canevello, A., & Crocker, J. (2011). Interpersonal goals, others’ regard for the self, and self-esteem: The paradoxical consequences of self-image and compassionate goals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.808.
Crocker, J., & Canevello, A. (2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.555.
Crocker, J., Canevello, A., & Lewis, K. A. (2017). Romantic relationships in the ecosystem: Compassionate goals, nonzero-sum beliefs, and change in relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000076.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, A. J. Elliot, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598–608). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
DeVoe, S. E., & House, J. (2012). Time, money, and happiness: How does putting a price on time affect our ability to smell the roses? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.012.
DeVoe, S. E., & Pfeffer, J. (2011). Time is tight: How higher economic value of time increases feelings of time pressure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022148.
Etkin, J., Evangelidis, I., & Aaker, J. (2015). Pressed for time? Goal conflict shapes how time is perceived, spent, and valued. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(3), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0130.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218.
Furukawa, H., Yamashita, M., & Yagi, R. (1993). Yutori no kozo: Kazoku, soshiki, ikigai [The structure of yutori: A specifically Japanese concept meaning subjective well-being]. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 9(3), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.14966/jssp.KJ00003725260.
Grant, A. M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 946–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017935.
Hancock, P. A., & Block, R. A. (2012). The psychology of time: A view backward and forward. The American Journal of Psychology, 125(3), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.125.3.0267.
Imazu, Y., Murakami, M., Kobayashi, M., Matsuno, T., Shiihara, Y., Ishihara, K., et al. (2004). Public Health Research Foundation sutoresu chekku risuto shoto fomu no sakusei: Shinraisei datousei no kento [The development of Public Health Research Foundation check list short form: Reliability and validity study]. Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, 46(4), 301–308.
Ito, Y., Sagara, J., Ikeda, M., & Kawaura, Y. (2003). Shukanteki kofukukan shakudo no sakusei to shinraisei datousei no kento [Reliability and validity of subjective well-being scale]. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 74(3), 276–281. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.74.276.
James, W. (1980). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt. https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000.
Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2009). Time affluence as a path toward personal happiness and ethical business practice: Empirical evidence from four studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(Suppl2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9696-1.
Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Culture and social support. American Psychologist, 63(6), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by University of Chicago Press.
Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125.
Langer, E. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2000). The construct of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00148.
Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H., & Dubé, L. (1995). Waiting time and decision making: Is time like money? Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1086/209439.
Levy, R. I. (1973). Tahitians: Mind and experience in the Society Islands. Oxford, England: University of Chicago Press.
Miura, A., & Kobayashi, T. (2015). Mechanical Japanese: Survey satisficing of online panels in Japan. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14966/jssp.31.1_1.
Mogilner, C., Chance, Z., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Giving time gives you time. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1233–1238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612442551.
Nelson, S. K., Layous, K., Cole, S. W., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2016). Do unto others or treat yourself? The effects of prosocial and self-focused behavior on psychological flourishing. Emotion, 16(6), 850–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000178.
Nichols, H. (1891). The psychology of time. American Journal of Psychology, 3, 453–529. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412061.
Niiya, Y. (2016). Development of the compassionate and self-image goals Scale in Japanese. Japanese Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.87.15216.
Niiya, Y., Crocker, J., & Mischkowski, D. (2013). Compassionate and self-image goals in the United States and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(3), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112451053.
Niiya, Y., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2012). Acceptability of favor requests in the United States and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(2), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110383426.
Ookubo, T., Naganuma, N., & Aoyagi, H. (2003). Gakko kankyo ni okeru shinri yokkyuno jusoku to tekioukan tono kanren [The relationship between psychological need satisfaction and subjective adjustment in school environment]. Human Science Research, 12, 21–28.
Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Roxburgh, S. (2004). There just aren’t enough hours in the day’: The mental health consequences of time pressure. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650404500201.
Roxburgh, S. (2012). Parental time pressures and depression among married dual-earner parents. Journal of Family Issues, 33(8), 1027–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11425324.
Rudd, M., Vohs, K. D., & Aaker, J. (2012). Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1130–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612438731.
Zauberman, G., & Lynch, J. J. (2005). Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time versus money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.23.
Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York, NY: Free Press.
Zuzanek, J. (2004). Work, leisure, time-pressure and stress. In J. T. Haworth, A. J. Veal, J. T. Haworth, & A. J. Veal (Eds.), Work and leisure (pp. 123–144). New York, NY: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
I thank Dr. Jennifer Crocker for providing helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript and Dr. Yuki Miyagawa for his assistance with the back-translation. This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15K17254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niiya, Y. My Time, Your Time, or Our Time? Time Perception and Its Associations with Interpersonal Goals and Life Outcomes. J Happiness Stud 20, 1439–1455 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0007-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0007-y