Skip to main content
Log in

Does Work Make Mothers Happy?

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper explores the link between employment and subjective well-being among mothers with children under 3 years of age. It uses a pooled sample from the ESS 2004–2014 data from 30 European countries. Analyzing multiple measures of subjective well-being, the paper shows that homemakers are generally happier than full-time workers. No significant differences between homemakers and part-time workers were found. Contrary to our expectations, homemaking was positively associated with happiness particularly among mothers who left higher quality employment for childcare. Though some variation across countries exists, it is not linked to the provision of formal childcare, duration of parental leave, or tax system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The data from 2004 and 2006 use different measures of income deciles that are not directly comparable with later waves. Thus, imputed values based on the original variable were used (for more see http://www.talkstats.com/archive/index.php/t-44664.html).

  2. For more see https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/ESS_weighting_data_1.pdf.

  3. A good instrument must be significantly linked to the explanatory variable but cannot be associated with the dependent variable. Unfortunately, the subjective well-being was generally associated with most other variables in the dataset. Finally, we used 1 individual level instrument (universality as defined in the Schwartz’s value scale] and two country-level characteristics (additional measures of childcare availability and parental leave benefits) that were not correlated with subjective well-being. Nevertheless, F-test shows that these instruments are relatively weak.

References

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 11, 715–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez, B., & Miles-Touya, D. (2016). Time allocation and women’s life satisfaction: Evidence from Spain. Social Indicators Research, 129(3), 1107–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Pugno, M. (2013). Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1033–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J., & Tai, T.-O. (2016). Inequalities in unpaid work: A cross-national comparison. In M. L. Connerley & J. Wu (Eds.), Handbook on well-being of working women (pp. 653–671). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benach, J., Vives, A., Amable, M., Vanroelen, C., Tarafa, G., & Muntaner, C. (2014). Precarious employment: Understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, E. M. (2013). Happy working mothers? Investigating the effect of maternal employment on life satisfaction. Economica, 80(317), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2012.00932.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P., & Drobnič, S. (2001). From male breadwinner to dual earner families. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. L., & Van Ours, J. C. (2009). Hours of work and gender identity: Does part-time work make the family happier? Economica, 76(301), 176–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boye, K. (2009). Relatively different? How do gender differences in well-being depend on paid and unpaid work in Europe? Social Indicators Research, 93, 509–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boye, K. (2011). Work and well-being in a comparative perspective—The role of family policy. European Sociological Review, 27(1), 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, P., & Markowitz, S. (2008). Family leave after childbirth and the health of new mothers. NBER working paper 14156. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • d’Addio, A. C., Chapple, S., Hoherz, A., & Van Landeghem, B. (2014). Using a quasi-natural experiment to identify the effects of birth-related leave policies on subjective well-being in Europe. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2013(1), 235–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2009). The science of well-being. The collected works of Ed Diener. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drobnič, S., Beham, B., & Präg, P. (2010). Good job, good life? Working conditions and quality of life in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 99(2), 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, D. (2007). Employment regimes and the quality of work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, D., & Russell, H. (2009). Work-family conflict and working conditions in Western Europe. Social Indicators Research, 93, 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A. (2007). Struggles with survey weighting and regression modeling. Statistical Science, 22(2), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., Mauss, I. B., & Tamir, M. (2011). A dark side of happiness? How, when, and why happiness is not always good. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 222–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagler, M., Hamby, S., Grych, J., & Banyard, V. (2016). Working for well-being: Uncovering the protective benefits of work through mixed methods analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1493–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9654-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. T., & Chandler, D. E. (2005). Psychological success: When the career is a calling. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 169–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hašková, H., & Dudová, R. (2017). Institutions and discourses on childcare for children under the age of three in a comparative French–Czech perspective. Sociological Research Online, 22(3), 120–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havnes, T., & Mogstad, M. (2011). Money for nothing? Universal child care and maternal employment. Journal of Public Economics, 95(11), 1455–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, 359(1449), 1435–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klumb, P. L., & Lampert, T. (2004). Women, work, and well-being 1950–2000: A review and methodological critique. Social Science and Medicine, 58(6), 1007–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. A., Geleijnse, J. M., Zitman, F. G., & Giltay, E. J. (2010). Effects of happiness on all-cause mortality during 15 years of follow-up: The Arnhem Elderly Study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(1), 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korn, E. L., & Graubard, B. I. (1995). Examples of differing weighted and unweighted estimates from a sample survey. The American Statistician, 49(3), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahelma, E., Arber, S., Katariina, K., & Roos, E. (2002). Multiple roles and health among british and finnish women: The influence of socioeconomic circumstances. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 727–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. A., Wayne, J. H., & Ford, M. T. (2014). A work–family conflict/subjective well-being process model: A test of competing theories of longitudinal effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1173–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnotte, K. L., Minnotte, M. C., & Thompson, K. (2016). The life satisfaction of dual-earner mothers and fathers: Does flexible scheduling matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(6), 2365–2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9698-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Eby, L. T. (2006). Locus of control at work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1057–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenmark, M. (2002). Multiple social roles—a resource or a burden: Is it possible for men and women to combine paid work with family life in a satisfactory way? Gender, Work & Organization, 9(2), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeters, A., & Craig, L. (2014). Part-time work, women’s work–life conflict, and job satisfaction: A cross-national comparison of Australia, the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 55(3), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, E., Burström, B., Saastamoinen, P., & Lahelma, E. (2005). A comparative study of the patterning of women’s health by family status and employment status in Finland and Sweden. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 2443–2451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salanova, M., Del Líbano, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2014). Engaged, workaholic, burned-out or just 9-to-5? Toward a typology of employee well-being. Stress and Health, 30(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiber, N. (2009). Reported levels of time-based and strain-based conflict between work and family roles in Europe: A multilevel approach. Social Indicators Research, 93, 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2009). The paradox of declining female happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(2), 190–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, H., Lewin-Epstein, N., & Braun, M. (2012). Work-family conflict in comparative perspective: The role of social policies. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(3), 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2006). Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 326–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, E., & Koo, J. (2008). Comparing subjective well-being across cultures and nations. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 414–427). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treas, J., van der Lippe, T., & Tai, T.-O. C. (2011). The happy homemaker? Married women’s well-being in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 90(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/90.1.111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. B. (2007). Work, happiness, and unhappiness [Kindle edition]. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigl, M., Stab, N., Herms, I., Angerer, P., Hacker, W., & Glaser, J. (2016). The associations of supervisor support and work overload with burnout and depression: A cross-sectional study in two nursing settings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, n/a-n/a,. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson, J., & Dickerson, A. (2010). Part-time employment and happiness: A cross-country analysis. In Sheffiled economic research paper series 2010021. University of Sheffield: Department of Economics

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work on this article was supported by grant from the Czech Science Foundation (GACR GB14-36154G).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dana Hamplová.

Appendix

Appendix

See Fig. 1 and Tables 7 and 8.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Source: ESS 2004–2014

Distribution of happiness in selected countries.

Table 7 Estimated coefficients from multilevel mixed effects regressions with the dependent variable subjective well-being (linear measure, rank, binary measure at 8th decile cut-point, binary measure at 9th decile cut-point), all mothers with a child 0–3, Happiness.
Table 8 Estimated coefficients from multilevel mixed effects regressions with the dependent variable subjective well-being (linear measure, rank, binary measure at 8th decile cut-point, binary measure at 9th decile cut-point), all mothers with a child 0–3, Satisfaction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamplová, D. Does Work Make Mothers Happy?. J Happiness Stud 20, 471–497 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9958-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9958-2

Keywords

Navigation