Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are Trained Medical Interpreters Worth the Cost? A Review of the Current Literature on Cost and Cost-Effectiveness

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The treatment of migrants with limited language proficiency poses major challenges to health care professionals. The use of professional interpreters in medical settings is still limited, which is, among other reasons, due to cost concerns. We performed a literature search in PubMed and included 11 articles examining cost and cost-effectiveness of using professional interpreters. Despite mixed findings, most studies indicated improvement of medical care and the investigated treatment outcome at limited additional cost or cost-savings. The interpretation of findings is limited by the sparsity of available studies, mixed settings as well as different outcome parameters. Therefore, more research on the benefits of using professional interpreters is required. Nonetheless, the available studies indicate a benefit for both patients and health care systems at very limited cost as compared to other expenditures in health care, supporting the call for a more widespread use of professional interpreters with scientific evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schouler-Ocak M. Mental health care for immigrants in Germany. Nervenarzt. 2015;86:1320–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fiscella K, Franks P, Doescher MP, Saver BG. Disparities in health care by race, ethnicity, and language among the insured: findings from a national sample. Med Care. 2002;40:52–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baarnhielm S, Aberg Wistedt A, Rosso MS. Revising psychiatric diagnostic categorisation of immigrant patients after using the Cultural Formulation in DSM-IV. Transcult Psychiatry. 2015;52:287–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bauer AM, Alegria M. Impact of patient language proficiency and interpreter service use on the quality of psychiatric care: a systematic review. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61:765–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:727–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flores G, Abreu M, Barone CP, Bachur R, Lin H. Errors of medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences: a comparison of professional versus ad hoc versus no interpreters. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60:545–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tate RC, Kelley MC. Triage in the Tower of Babel: interpreter services for children in the prehospital setting. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29:1280–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Quan K, Lynch J. The high costs of language barriers in medical malpractice. Berkeley, CA: National Health Law Program; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. US Department of Health and Human Services Nondiscrimination in Health Programs or Activities. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-05-18/pdf/2016-11458.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.

  10. Lundin C, Hadziabdic E, Hjelm K. Language interpretation conditions and boundaries in multilingual and multicultural emergency healthcare. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018;18:23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gadon M, Balch GI, Jacobs EA. Caring for patients with limited English proficiency: the perspectives of small group practitioners. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(Suppl 2):341–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh E. Not just “getting by”: factors influencing providers’ choice of interpreters. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diamond LC, Schenker Y, Curry L, Bradley EH, Fernandez A. Getting by: underuse of interpreters by resident physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:256–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ku L, Flores G. Pay now or pay later: providing interpreter services in health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:435–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobs EA, Leos GS, Rathouz PJ, Fu P Jr. Shared networks of interpreter services, at relatively low cost, can help providers serve patients with limited english skills. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:1930–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobs EA, Shepard DS, Suaya JA, Stone EL. Overcoming language barriers in health care: costs and benefits of interpreter services. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:866–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schreiter S, Winkler J, Bretz J, Schouler-Ocak M. What do interpreters cost?—a retrospective analysis of the costs for interpreters in treatment of refugees in a psychiatric outpatient clinic in Berlin. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2016;66:356–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Drennan G. Counting the cost of language services in psychiatry. S Afr Med J. 1996;86:343–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bischoff A, Denhaerynck K. What do language barriers cost? An exploratory study among asylum seekers in Switzerland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobs EA, Lauderdale DS, Meltzer D, Shorey JM, Levinson W, Thisted RA. Impact of interpreter services on delivery of health care to limited-English-proficient patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:468–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jacobs EA, Sadowski LS, Rathouz PJ. The impact of an enhanced interpreter service intervention on hospital costs and patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(Suppl 2):306–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hampers LC, Cha S, Gutglass DJ, Binns HJ, Krug SE. Language barriers and resource utilization in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 1999;103:1253–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hampers LC, Mcnulty JE. Professional interpreters and bilingual physicians in a pediatric emergency department: effect on resource utilization. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1108–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lindholm M, Hargraves JL, Ferguson WJ, Reed G. Professional language interpretation and inpatient length of stay and readmission rates. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1294–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bernstein J, Bernstein E, Dave A, Hardt E, James T, Linden J, Mitchell P, Oishi T, Safi C. Trained medical interpreters in the emergency department: effects on services, subsequent charges, and follow-up. J Immigr Health. 2002;4:171–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jacobs E, Chen AH, Karliner LS, Agger-Gupta N, Mutha S. The need for more research on language barriers in health care: a proposed research agenda. Milbank Q. 2006;84:111–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vanderwielen LM, Enurah AS, Rho HY, Nagarkatti-Gude DR, Michelsen-King P, Crossman SH, Vanderbilt AA. Medical interpreters: improvements to address access, equity, and quality of care for limited-English-proficient patients. Acad Med. 2014;89:1324–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Phillips CB, Travaglia J. Low levels of uptake of free interpreters by Australian doctors in private practice: secondary analysis of national data. Aust Health Rev. 2011;35:475–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schouler-Ocak M, Graef-Calliess IT, Tarricone I, Qureshi A, Kastrup MC, Bhugra D. EPA guidance on cultural competence training. Eur Psychiatry. 2015;30:431–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoop JG, Dipasquale T, Hernandez JM, Roberts LW. Ethics and culture in mental health care. Ethics Behav. 2008;18:353–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

EJB and SS are participants in the Clinician Scientist Program of Charité and the Berlin Institute of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva J. Brandl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

EJB has received speaker fees from Servier and Medice. MS-O has received speaker fees from Servier and Forum für medizinische Fortbildung as well as for expert opinions provided for courts. SS declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brandl, E.J., Schreiter, S. & Schouler-Ocak, M. Are Trained Medical Interpreters Worth the Cost? A Review of the Current Literature on Cost and Cost-Effectiveness. J Immigrant Minority Health 22, 175–181 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-019-00915-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-019-00915-4

Keywords

Navigation