Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Semantic Specificity Hypothesis: When Gestures Do Not Depend Upon the Presence of a Listener

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humans gesture even when their gestures can serve no communicative function (e.g., when the listener cannot see them). This study explores the intrapersonal function of gestures, and the semantic content of the speech they accompany. Sixty-eight adults participated in pairs, communicating on an object description task. Visibility of partner was manipulated; participants completed half the task behind a screen. Participants produced iconic gestures significantly more for praxic items (i.e., items with physically manipulable properties) than non-praxic items, regardless of visibility of partner. These findings support the semantic specificity hypothesis, whereby a gesture is integrally associated with the semantic properties of the word it accompanies. Where those semantic properties include a high motor component the likelihood of a gesture being produced is increased, irrespective of communication demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alibali, M. W., Heath, D. C., & Myers, H. J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., & Dick, F. (2002). Language, gesture and the developing brain. Developing Psychobiology, 40, 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (1999). Do iconic gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? Semiotica, 123, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (2002). What properties of talk are associated with the production of spontaneous iconic hand gestures? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 403–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, P., & Krauss, R. M. (1994). Gesture and speech in spontaneous and rehearsed narratives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 580–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyereisen, P., & Havard, I. (1999). Mental imagery and production of hand gestures while speaking in younger and older adults. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 23, 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, N. (1977). Hands, words, and mind: On the structuralization of body movements during discourse and the capacity for verbal representation. In N. Freedman & S. Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structures: A psychoanalytic interpretation of communication (pp. 109–132). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, N., van Meel, J., Barroso, F., & Bucci, W. (1986). On the development of communicative competence. Semiotica, 62, 77–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frick-Horbury, D., & Guttentag, R. E. (1998). The effects of restricting hand gesture production on lexical retrieval and free recall. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci, M., & Dalla Volta, R. (2008). Spoken language and arm gestures are controlled by the same motor control system. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 944–957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). What’s communication got to do with it? Gesture in children blind from birth. Developmental Psychology, 33, 453–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, N., & Garnham, A. (2007). The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), Relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–228). The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M., Dushay, R. A., Chen, Y., & Rauscher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gestures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 533–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review, 92, 350–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsella, E., & Krauss, R. M. (2004). The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. The American Journal of Psychology, 34, 411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsella, E., & Krauss, R. M. (2005). Muscular activity in the arm during lexical retrieval: Implications for gesture-speech theories. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 415–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozyurek, A., & Kita, S. (1999). Expressing manner and path in English and Turkish: Differences in speech, gesture and conceptualisations. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 507–512). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitto, L. A., Holowka, S., Sergio, L. E., & Ostry, D. (2001). Language rhythms in baby hand movements. Nature, 413, 35–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, K. J., Bird, H., & Kirk, E. (2007). The effects of prohibiting gesture on children’s lexical retrieval ability. Developmental Science, 10, 747–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rausher, F., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7, 226–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M., & Douglas, J. (2001). The differential facilitatory effects of gesture and visualisation processes on object naming in aphasia. Aphasiology, 15, 977–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, J., van Tourennout, M., & Martin, A. (2007). A neural system for learning about object function. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 513–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wesp, R., Hesse, J., & Keutmann, D. (2001). Gestures maintain spatial imagery. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 591–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willems, R. M., & Hagoot, P. (2007). Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture and action: A review. Brain and Language, 101, 278–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen J. Pine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pine, K.J., Gurney, D.J. & Fletcher, B. The Semantic Specificity Hypothesis: When Gestures Do Not Depend Upon the Presence of a Listener. J Nonverbal Behav 34, 169–178 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-010-0089-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-010-0089-7

Keywords

Navigation