Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender Differences in Speech Temporal Patterns Detected Using Lagged Co-occurrence Text-Analysis of Personal Narratives

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a novel methodology for the detection of speech patterns. Lagged co-occurrence analysis (LCA) utilizes the likelihood that a target word will be uttered in a certain position after a trigger word. Using this methodology, it is possible to uncover a statistically significant repetitive temporal patterns of word use, compared to a random choice of words. To demonstrate this new tool on autobiographical narratives, 200 subjects related each a 5-min story, and these stories were transcribed and subjected to LCA, using software written by the author. This study focuses on establishing the usefulness of LCA in psychological research by examining its associations with gender. The application of LCA to the corpus of personal narratives revealed significant differences in the temporal patterns of using the word “I” between male and female speakers. This finding is particularly demonstrative of the potential for studying speech temporal patterns using LCA, as men and women tend to utter the pronoun “I” in comparable frequencies. Specifically, LCA of the personal narratives showed that, on average, men tended to have shorter interval between their use of the pronoun, while women speak longer between two subsequent utterances of the pronoun. The results of this study are discussed in light of psycholinguistic factors governing male and female speech communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeles, M. (1991). Neural codes for higher brain function. In H. J. Markowitsch (Ed.), Information processing by the brain: Views and hypotheses from a physiological-cognitive perspective. Hans Huber.

  • Aertsen A.M.H.J., Gerstein G.L., Habib M.K., Palm G. (1989) Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: Modulation of effective connectivity. Journal of Neurophysiology 61: 900–919

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alpert M., Rosenberg S.D., Pouget E.R., Shaw R.J. (2000) Prosody and lexical accuracy in flat affect schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 97: 107–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press.

  • Anderson K.J., Leaper C. (1998) Emotion talk between same-and mixed-gender friends: Form and function. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 17(4): 419–448. doi:10.1177/0261927X980174001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen N.J., Pfohl B. (1976) Linguistic analysis of speech in affective disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry 33(11): 1361–1367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley A.D. (1994) The magical number seven: Still magic after all these years?. Psychological Review 101: 353–356. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin A.L. (1942) Personal structure analysis: A statistical method for investigation of the single personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 37: 163–183. doi:10.1037/h0061697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilous F.R., Krauss R.M. (1988) Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language & Communication 8(3–4): 183–194. doi:10.1016/0271-5309(88)90016-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blauberg M.S., Braine M.D.S. (1974) Short-term memory limitations on decoding self-embedded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102: 745–748. doi:10.1037/h0036091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock J.K. (1986) Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12: 575–586. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.12.4.575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon L. (2002) Gender: Psychological perspectives. Allyn and Bacon, Boston MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness : Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bybee J. (2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4): 711–733. doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo J.T., von Hippel W., Ernst J.M. (1997) Mapping cognitive structures and processes through verbal content: The thought-listing technique. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 65: 249–262. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.65.6.928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron D., McAlinden F., O’Leary K. (1989) Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In: Coates J., Cameron D. (eds) Women in their speech communities : New perspectives on language and sex. Longman, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R.S., Pennebaker J.W. (2003) The secret life of pronouns: Flexibility in writing style and physical health. Psychological Science 14: 60–65. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carli L.L. (1990) Gender, language and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(5): 941–951. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaika E.O. (1990) Understanding psychotic speech: beyond Freud and Chomsky. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1957) Syntactic structures. Mouton Press, The Hague, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen M.H., Chater N. (1999) Connectionist natural language processing: The state of the art. Cognitive Science 23: 417–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen M.H., Chater N. (2001) Connectionist psycholinguistics: Capturing the empirical data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(2): 82–88. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01600-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chung C.K., Pennebaker J.W. (2007) The psychological function of function words. In: Fiedler K. (eds) Social communication: Frontiers of social psychology. Psychology Press, New York, pp 343–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark H., Wasow T. (1998) Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology 37: 201–242. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, C. S. (1969). Linguistic structure and personality development. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 16, (5, pt. 2), 1–19.

  • Covington M.A., He C., Brown C., Naci L., McClain J.T., Fjordbak B.S., Semple J., Brown J. (2005) Schizophrenia and the structure of language: The linguist’s view. Schizophrenia Research 77: 85–98. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2005.01.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford M.E. (1995) Talking difference: On gender and language. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby F., Nyquist L. (1977) The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff’s hypothesis. Language in Society 6(3): 313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby J.K. (1981) Speech evaluation in psychiatry. Grune & Stratton, Inc, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell G.S. (1986) A spreading activation theory of retrieval in language production. Psychological Review 93: 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dell G.S., Chang F., Griffin Z.M. (1999) Connectionist models of language production: Lexical access and grammatical encoding. Cognitive Science 23(4): 517–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman P. (1990) Conversational insecurity. In: Cameron D. (eds) The feminist critique of language. Routledge, London, UK, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick M.A., Mulac A., Dindia K. (1995) Gender-preferential language use in spouse and stranger interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14(1–2): 18–39. doi:10.1177/0261927X95141002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser W.I., King K.M., Thomas P., Kendell R.E. (1986) The diagnosis of schizophrenia by language analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry 148: 275–278. doi:10.1192/bjp.148.3.275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giles H., Mulac A., Bradac J.J., Johnson P. (1987) Speech accomodation theory: The first decade and beyond. Communication Yearbook 10: 13–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleser G.C., Gottschalk L.A., Watkins J. (1959) The relationship of sex and intelligence to choice of words: A normative study of verbal behavior. Journal of Clinical Psychology 15: 182–191 doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(195904)15:2<182::AID-JCLP2270150219>3.0.CO;2-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldrick M. (2007) Connectionist principles in theories of speech production. In: Gareth Gaskell M. (eds) Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J., Dell G. (2003) Learning to divide the labor: An account of deficits in light and heavy verb production. Cognitive Science 27: 1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk L.A. (1969) The measurement of psychological states through the content analysis of verbal behavior. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory M., Raymond W.D., Bell A., Fosler-Lussier E., Jurafsky D. (1999) The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. Chicago Linguistic Society 35: 151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz J.J. (1976) Language, communication and public negotiation. In: Sanday P. (eds) Anthropology and the public interest. Academic Press, NewYork, pp 273–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas A. (1979) Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence. Psychological Bulletin 86(3): 616–626. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey A.G., Bryant R.A. (1998) The relationship between acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder: A prospective evaluation of motor vehicle accident survivors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66: 507–512. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.3.507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson A., Goldman-Eisler F., Skarbek A. (1966) Sequential temporal patterns in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 9: 207–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes J. (1990) Women, men and politeness. Longman, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe J., Beebe B., Feldstein S., Crown C.L., Jasnow M.D. (2001) III. Method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 66(2): 39–51. doi:10.1111/1540-5834.00139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe J., Feldstein S. (1970) Rhythms of dialogue. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanneau M., Armelius B.A. (1993) Linguistic characteristics of neurotic, borderline and psychotic personality organization. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 34(1): 64–75. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1993.tb01101.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jucker A.H., Smith S.W. (1998) And people just you know like ‘wow’: Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. In: Jucker A.H., Ziv Y. (eds) Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 171–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., McGonagle, K. A., Zhao, S., Nelson, C. B., Caplan, P. J., & Caplan, J. B. (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results for the National Comorbidity Survey.

  • King K., Fraser W.I., Thomas P., Kendell R.E. (1990) Reexamination of the language of psychotic subjects. The British Journal of Psychiatry 156: 211–215. doi:10.1192/bjp.156.2.211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Labov W. (1990) The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2(2): 205–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

  • Lakoff R.T. (1975) Language and woman’s place. Harper & Row, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff R.T. (1977) Women’s language. Language and Style 10(4): 222–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff R. (1990) Talking power: The politics of language. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Levenston E.A. (1969) Imperative structures in English. Linguistics 50: 38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott P.R., Guggenbuhl S., Schneeberger A., Pulver A.E., Stassen H.H. (2002) Linguistic analysis of the speech output of schizophrenic, bipolar, and depressive patients. Psychopathology 35: 220–227. doi:10.1159/000063831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury F.G. (1954) Transitional probability, linguistic structure, and systems of habit-family hierarchies. In: Osgood C.E., Sebeok T.A. (eds) Psycholinguistics: A survey of theory and research problems. Waverly Press, Baltimore, pp 93–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay M. (2001) Tough talk: Indirectness and gender in requests for information. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 293–316. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00129-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclay H., Osgood C.E. (1959) Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word 15: 19–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning C.D., Schütze H. (1999a) Collocations. In: Manning C.D., Schütze H. (eds) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, pp 151–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning C.D., Schütze H. (1999b) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan A. (1991) The effects of agreement, disagreement, gender and familiarity on patterns of dyadic interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 10(3): 205–212. doi:10.1177/0261927X91103004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan J.R., Clifton A.K., McGrath D. (1977) Women’s language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality?. Sex Roles 3(6): 545–559. doi:10.1007/BF00287838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mergenthaler E., Stinson C.H. (1992) Psychotherapy transcription standards. Psychotherapy Research 2: 125–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1967). The psychology of communication. Penguin.

  • Mondorf B. (2002) Gender differences in English syntax. Journal of English Linguistics 30(2): 158–180. doi:10.1177/007242030002005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morice R., McNicol D. (1986) Language changes in schizophrenia: A limited replication. Schizophrenia Bulletin 12: 239–251

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mott H., Petrie H. (1995) Workplace interactions: Women’s linguistic behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14: 324–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulac A., Bradac J.J., Gibbons P. (2001) Empirical support for the gender-as-culture hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female language differences. Human Communication Research 27(1): 121–152. doi:10.1093/hcr/27.1.121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulac A., Lundell T.L. (1986) Linguistic contributors to the gender-linked language effect. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 5(2): 81–101. doi:10.1177/0261927X8652001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulac A., Studley L.B., Blau S. (1990) The gender-linked language effect in primary and secondary students’ impromptu essays. Sex Roles 23(9–10): 439–469. doi:10.1007/BF00289762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulac A., Wiemann J.M., Widenmann S.J., Gibson T.W. (1988) Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: The gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs 55(4): 315–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, S., & Jurafsky, D. (1998). Bayesian models of human sentence processing. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. University of Wisconsin–Madson.

  • Narayanan S., Jurafsky D. (2002) A Bayesian model predicts human parse preference and reading time in sentence processing. In: Dietterich T.G., Becker S., Ghahramani Z. (eds) Advances in neural information processing 14. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxman T.E., Rosenberg S.D., Schnurr P.P., Tucker G.J. (1988) Diagnostic classification through content analysis of patients’ speech. The American Journal of Psychiatry 145: 464–468

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palomares N. (2004) Gender schematicity, gender identity salience, and gender-linked language use. Human Communication Research 30: 556–588. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00745.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pease, B., & Pease, A. (2001). Why men don’t listen and women can’t read maps: How we’re different and what to do about it. Broadway Books.

  • Pennebaker J.W., King L.A. (1999) Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(6): 1296–1312. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker J.W., Mehl M.R., Niederhoffer K.G. (2003) Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 547–577. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pothos E.M., Juola P. (2007) Characterizing linguistic structure with mutual information. The British Journal of Psychology 98: 291–304. doi:10.1348/000712606X122760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prurting C.A., Kirchner D.M. (1987) A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 52: 105–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin A.B., Oltmanns T.F. (1986) Lexical cohesion and formal thought disorder during and after psychotic episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 95: 181–183. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.95.2.181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber R.W., Vetter H. (1994) The problem of language and thought in schizophrenia: A review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23: 149–195. doi:10.1007/BF02143921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ries, K. (1999). Towards the detection and description of textual meaning indicators in spontaneous conversations. Paper presented at the European Conference On Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH ‘99), September 5–9, Budapest, Hungary.

  • Rohde, D. L. T. (2002). A connectionist model of sentence comprehension and production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

  • Roland D., Dick F., Elman J.L. (2007) Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language 57: 348–379. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter D.R. (1985) Language in schizophrenia. The structure of monologues and conversations. The British Journal of Psychiatry 146: 399–404. doi:10.1192/bjp.146.4.399

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnurr P.P., Rosenberg S.D., Oxman T.E. (1992) Comparison of TAT and free speech techniques for eliciting source material in computerized content analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment 58(2): 311–325. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5802_10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J., Jaffe J. (1968) Markovian prediction of sequential temporal patterns in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 11: 27–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg M.S. (1997) Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science 27: 1599–1603. doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey N. (1992) Connectionist natural language processing. Intellect Books, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shastri L. (1988) A connectionist approach to knowledge representation and limited inference. Cognitive Science 12(3): 331–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuell T.J. (1969) Clustering and organization in free recall. Psychological Bulletin 72: 353–374. doi:10.1037/h0028141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulz D., Cohen S., Haidarliu S., Ahissar E. (1997) Differential effects of acetylcholine in the auditory cortex of the Guinea Pig. The European Journal of Neuroscience 9: 396–409. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1997.tb01409.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegman, A.W., Feldstein, S. (eds) (1979) Of speech and time: Temporal speech patterns, in interpersonal contexts. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegman A.W.E., Feldstein S.E. (1987) Nonverbal behavior and communication (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., Ogilvie, D. M., et al. (1966). The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. The MIT Press.

  • Tannen D. (1984) Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Ablex, Norwood, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen D. (1991) You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation (1st ed). Ballantine Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen D. (1994a) Gender and discourse. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen D. (1994) Talking from 9 to 5: How women’s and men’s conversational styles affect who gets heard, who gets credit, and what gets done at work (1st ed). W. Morrow, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M.A., Reed R., Berenbaum S. (1994) Patterns of speech disorders in schizophrenia and mania. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 182: 319–326. doi:10.1097/00005053-199406000-00002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne B., Kramarae C., Henley N. (1983) Language, gender and society: Opening a second decade of research. In: Thorne B., Kramarae C., Henley N. (eds) Language, gender and society. Newbury House Publishers, Inc, Rowley, MA, pp 7–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Trafimow D., Silverman i.S., Fan R.M., Law J.S.F. (1997) The effects of language and priming on the relative accessibility of the private self and the collective self. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 28: 107–123. doi:10.1177/0022022197281007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trafimow D., Triandis H.C., Goto S.H. (1991) Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60: 649–655. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q. (2001) Culture effects on adults’ earliest childhood recollection and self-description: Implications for the relation between memory and the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 220–233. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welkowitz J., Bond R., Zelano J. (1990a) An automated system for the analysis of temporal speech patterns: Description of the hardware and software. Journal of Communication Disorders 231: 347–364. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(90)90009-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welkowitz J., Bond R.N., Feldman L., Tota M.E. (1990b) Conversation time patterns and mutual influence in parent–child interactions: A time series approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19: 221–243. doi:10.1007/BF01077258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wojtkowski, S. (1993). Linguistic indicators of introversion and extraversion: A study of the relationship between linguistic and personological styles. PhD Thesis

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, 445 W 59th St rm# 2402, New York, NY, 10019, USA

    Shuki J. Cohen

  2. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 34 Park St. Suite #B-38, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA

    Shuki J. Cohen

Authors
  1. Shuki J. Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuki J. Cohen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, S.J. Gender Differences in Speech Temporal Patterns Detected Using Lagged Co-occurrence Text-Analysis of Personal Narratives. J Psycholinguist Res 38, 111–127 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9088-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9088-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation