Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Morphological Complexity in Arabic Spelling and Its Implication for Cognitive Processing

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 July 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Spelling poses a challenge to Arabic-speaking learners due to the complexity of the morphological and orthographic systems in Arabic. Arabic morphology has been argued to play a critical role in spelling since its morphological operations are built on a system consisting of a root that is interlocking into different patterns of vowels to form different categories of words. This study made a detailed classification of spelling errors in a word dictation task, based on morphological structures, undertaken by 107 Typically-developing learners (TD) and learners with learning disabilities (LD) attending the same schools in Jordan. All participants ranged in age from 7 years, 3 months to 15 years, 2 months (grades 2 to 8). The spelling task was made up of 400 common words representing most morphological forms in different conjugations and grammatical classes. The results indicated that TD and LD learners follow a similar pattern of complexity even though the LD group produced more errors than the TD group. Both groups encountered more difficulties in passive voice forms followed by active voice forms. Furthermore, both groups spelled nouns, verbal nouns and derivations more accurately than verbal forms (active and passive voice). The results provide additional evidence for the nonlinear growth of morphological knowledge in spelling. In addition, spelling errors suggested that the spelling process goes in a hierarchical way where words can be accessed and processed either according to the root or according to the stem. Therefore, roots or stems are firstly accessed and attached to basic word patterns (the grapheme without diacritics and affixes). Thereafter, prefixes and, then, suffixes are attached to the word pattern and, finally, diacritics are accessed and attached to the word pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. Arab grammarians, traditionally, use the root فعل [fʕl]—a basic meaning of ‘to do’—to represent the three consonants of the Arabic roost as a generic one to exemplify the root and word patterns.

  2. وفّق has a geminated ف [f].

References

  • Abu-Hamour, B. (2013). Arabic spelling and curriculum based measurement. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist Journal, 30, 140–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (1996). The role of vowels & context in the reading of highly skilled Arabic readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 629–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (1997). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary, 9, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu- Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2004). Reading and spelling error analysis of native Arabic dyslexic readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 651–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2006). Phonological errors predominate in Arabic spelling across grades 1–9. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 167–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abu Rabia, S., & Sammour, R. (2013). Spelling errors’ analysis of regular and dyslexic bilingual Arabic-English students. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3, 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AL-Harahshe, I. M. (1990). التراكيب اللغوية في كتابي القراءة للصفين الأول والثاني من المرحلة الأساسية في الأردن linguistic structures in first and second grades text book of Arabic in Jordan. Master's Thesis. Yarmouk University (in Arabic).

  • Alrabaa, S. (1986). Diglossia in the classroom: The Arabic case. Anthropological Linguistics, 28, 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amayreh, M. M., & Dyson, A. T. (1998). The acquisition of Arabic consonants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(3), 642–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amayreh, M. (2003). Completion of the consonant inventory of Arabic. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 517–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K., Masterson, J., & Niessen, N. (2004). Spelling assessment frameworks. In A. Stone, E. Silliman, B. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 644–660). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asadi, I., Ibrahim, R., & Khateb, A. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9, 60–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzam, R. (1989). Orthography and reading in the Arabic language. In P. G. Aaron (Ed.), Reading and writing disorders in different orthographic systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzam, Ri. (1993). The nature of Arabic reading and spelling errors of young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, R., Silliman, E., Berninger, V. W., & Dowa, M. (2012). Linguistic pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1–9. Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1587–1599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bat-El, O. (1994). Stem modification and cluster transfer in modern Hebrew. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 12, 571–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benmamoun, E. (1999). Arabic morphology: The central role of the imperfective. Lingua, 108, 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benmamoun, E. (2003). The role of the imperfective template in Arabic morphology. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based, morphology (pp. 99–114). John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T., & Abd-El-Jawad, H. (1996). The unfolding of suprasegmental representations: A cross-linguistic perspective1. Journal of Linguistics, 32(2), 291–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S. (2014). Is the Arabic mental lexicon morpheme-based or stem-based? Implications for spoken and written word recognition. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy, literacy studies (Vol. 9, pp. 31–54). Springer Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition, 81, 65–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2004). Allomorphic variation in Arabic: Implications for lexical processing and representation. Brain and Language, 90, 106–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa, D., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Use of morphology in spelling by children with dyslexia and typically developing children. Memory and Cognition, 34(3), 703–714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 257–294). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and infectonal morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 37(1), 90–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, S. M., & Liow, S. (2014). The locus of word frequency effects in skilled spelling-to-dictation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1720–1741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coulmas, F. (1996). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, S., Manis, F. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). Parallels between the reading and spelling deficits of two subgroups of developmental dyslexics. Reading and Writing, 14(5), 515–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., & Zawaydeh, B. A. (2001). Arabic hypocoristics and the status of the consonantal root. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(3), 512–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamanti, V., Goulandris, N., Stuart, M., & Campbell, R. (2014). Spelling of derivational and inflectional suffixes by Greek-speaking children with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 27, 337–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeheri, G., Everatt, J., Mahfoudhi, A., Al-diyar, M., & Taibah, N. (2011). Orthographic processing and reading comprehension among Arabic speaking mainstream and LD children. Dyslexia, 17, 123–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdan, J., & Amayreh, M. (2007). Consonant profile of arabic-speaking school-age children in Jordan. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica, 59, 55–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Idrissi, A., & Kehayia, E. (2004). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon: Evidence from an individual with deep dyslexia. Brain and Language, 90, 183–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Issa, I. (2020). The impact of morphological awareness versus phonological awareness on Arabic spelling. Psychology and Education, 57, 211–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issa, I. (2006). Mental representation of Arabic morphology: Evidence from Arabic hypocoristic. Master's Thesis. Unpublished Thesis, University of Potsdam, Germany.

  • Jiménez, J. E. (2008). Spelling development in the Spanish language. Psicothema, 20, 786–794.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2017). 1 12 2017. http://www.moe.gov.jo/Departments/DepartmentsMenuDetails.aspx?MenuID=687&DepartmentID=30.

  • Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad, A. M. (2000). Word order, agreement and pronominaization in standard and Palestinian Arabic. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). The number of words printed in school English. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, A. (2011). Phonologically-conditioned allomorph selection. The Companion to Phonology, 4, 2357–2382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Omar, M. (1973). The acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a native language. Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prunet, J.-F., Beland, R., & Idrissi, A. (2000). The mental representation of semitic words. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 609–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, R. (1997). Prosodic templates in a word-based morphologicl analysis of Arabic. In M. Eid & R. R. Ratcliffe (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics (pp. 147–171). John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2012). Spelling Hebrew: The psycholinguistic of Hebrew spelling. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece, C., & Treiman, R. (2001). Children’s spelling of syllabic /r/ and of letter-name vowels: Broadening the study of spelling development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 139–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryding, K. (2005). A reference grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Safi-Stagni, S. (1995). Morphological structure and lexical processing: Evide from Arabic. In M. Eid (Ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics VΙI (pp. 93–106). John Benjamin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. Writting Systems Research, 5, 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 559–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 227–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawalha, M., & Atwell, E. (2013). A standard tag set expounding traditional morphological features for Arabic language part-of-speech tagging. Word Structure, 6(1), 43–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, 2, 257–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, E., Bahr, R., & Peters, M. (2006). Spelling patterns in preadolescents with atypical language skills: Phonological, morphological, and orthographic factors. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 93–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen, F., & Gunter, L. (2001). Best practices in spelling instruction: A research summary. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1, 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffler, D. J. (2001). Implicit cognition and spelling development. Developmental Review, 21, 168–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzby, E. (1996). Roles of oral and written language as children approach conventional literacy. In C. E. Pontecorvo (Ed.), Early text construction in children (pp. 25–46). Erbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Ardasinski, S. (2006). Obligatory decomposition in reading. The Mental Lexicon, 1, 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 745–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Verbal Learning and Verbal Behviour, 14, 638–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taha, H. (2013). Reading and spelling in Arabic: Linguistic and orthographic complexity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3, 721–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taha, H., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2017). Morphology and spelling in Arabic: Development and interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 27–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., Cassar, M., & Zukowski, A. (1994). What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps. Child Development, 65, 1318–1337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children's spelling of final consonant clusters. Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ussishkin, A. (1999). The inadequacy of the consonantal root: Modern Hebrew denominal verbs and output–output correspondence. Phonology, 16, 401–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge the counseling and guidelines of Dr. Ron Simango (Rhodes University), Dr. Sami Boudelaa (University of United Arab Emirates), and Dr. Abdessatar Mahfoudi (Australian College of Kuwait).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Community Development Authority, P.O. BOX: 212288, Dubai, UAE

    Iyad Issa

Authors
  1. Iyad Issa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iyad Issa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Iyad Issa declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by the author.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original article has been revised due wrong Arabic script was present in the published version.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Issa, I. Morphological Complexity in Arabic Spelling and Its Implication for Cognitive Processing. J Psycholinguist Res 52, 331–357 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09896-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09896-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation