Abstract
Objectives
Crime continuity is one of the best documented and least understood aspects of criminal behavior. Psychological inertia, the notion that cognitive variables mediate the relationship between earlier and later expressions of the same behavior, was tested as a possible explanation for crime continuity.
Methods
The cognitive mediation and additive postulates of the psychological inertia theorem were tested in a path analysis using self-report data from 1170 male delinquent members of the Pathways to Desistance study (Mulvey in Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2012). Wave 1 delinquency served as the independent variable, Wave 3 delinquency served as the dependent variable, Wave 2 outcome expectancies for crime, self-efficacy, general criminal thinking, and social capital served as the mediator variables, and 12 different baseline measures from criminological theory served as control variables in this study.
Results
General criminal thinking and low self-efficacy successfully mediated the relationship between past and future offending after age, race, early behavioral problems, peer criminality, family criminality, parental knowledge and monitoring, parental hostility, routine activities, measured intelligence, and precursors for each of the mediators were controlled. Social capital (cumulative disadvantage), by comparison, failed to mediate crime continuity in this study.
Conclusions
Effective cognitive mediation of the relationship between Wave 1 offending and Wave 3 offending and evidence that the effect may be additive offer preliminary support for the cognitive mediation and additive postulates of the psychological inertia theorem. Practical implications of these results include the need to routinely assess cognitive factors in criminal populations and target these factors for intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect should not be interpreted as an effect size measure nor should it be compared across studies (Hayes 2009). However, it may provide useful information when comparing results from the same study, particularly when the only difference between the two pathways being compared is the mediator variables.
When the three cognitive variables were combined to form a single cognitive measure and cross-lagged with total offending at Waves 1, 2, and 3 the results indicated that while Wave 2 cognition mediated the Wave 1–Wave 3 offending relationship (Estimate = 0.016, 95 % Confidence Interval = 0.006, 0.030), Wave 2 offending failed to mediate the Wave 1–Wave 3 cognition relationship (Estimate = 0.005, 95 % Confidence Interval = −0.002, .0.015).
References
Agnew R (1992) Foundation for a general strain theory. Criminology 30:47–87
Akers RL (1998) Social learning and social structure: a general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press, Boston
Allison PD (2012) Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. SAS Global Forum 2012 (Paper 312-2012). SAS Institute, Cary
Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Bandura A, Barbarnelli C, Caprara GV, Pastorelli C (1996) Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. J Pers Soc Psychol 71:364–374
Bernburg JG, Krohn MD (2003) Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: the direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology 41:1287–1318
Bursik RJ, Grasmick HG (1993) Neighborhoods and crime: the dimensions of effective community control. Lexington, New York
Caprara GV, Cervone D (2000) Personality: determinants, dynamics, and potentials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Center for Human Resource Research (2009) NLSY79 User’s Guide, CHRR NLS User Services. The Ohio State University, Columbus
Cohen L, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–608
Cole DA, Maxwell SE (2003) Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. J Abnorm Psychol 112:558–577
Conger R, Ge X, Elder G Jr, Lorenz F, Simons R (1994) Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents. Child Dev 65:541–561
Cornish DB, Clark RV (eds) (1986) The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer, New York
Gottfredson M, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr 76:408–420
Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford, New York
Hirschi T, Gottfredson M (1983) Age and the explanation of crime. Am J Sociol 89:552–584
Huizinga D, Esbensen F, Weihar A (1991) Are there multiple paths to delinquency? J Crim Law Criminol 82:83–118
Kenny DA (2013) Mediation: sensitivity analysis [webinar]. http://davidakenny.net/webinars/Mediation/Sensitivity/Sensitivity.html
MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS (2007) Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol 58:593–614
MacKinnon DP, Kisbu-Sakarya Y, Gottschall AC (2013) Developments in mediation analysis. In: Little TD (ed) The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods, vol 2. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 338–360
McAdams DP, Pals JF (2006) A new big five: fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. Am Psychol 61:204–217
Menard S, Elliott DS (1996) Prediction of adult success using stepwise logistic regression analysis. A Report Prepared for the MacArthur Foundation by the MacArthur Chicago-Denver Neighborhood Project
Mulvey EP (2012) The pathways to desistance study: design and methods. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p574246_index.html. Retrieved 03 June 2013
Muthén B, Muthén L (1998–2007) Mplus User’s Guide (5th ed). Muthén and Muthén, Los Angeles
Nagin DS, Paternoster R (1994) Personal capital and social control: the deterrence implications of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology 32:581–606
Nagin D, Paternoster R (2000) Population heterogeneity and state dependence: state of the evidence and directions for future research. J Quant Criminol 16:117–144
Osgood DW, Wilson JK, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Johnston LD (1996) Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. Am Sociol Rev 61:635–655
Pituch KA, Stapleton LM (2008) The performance of methods to test upper-level mediation in the presence of nonnormal data. Multivar Behav Res 43:237–267
Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40:879–891
Rotunda RJ, Doman K (2001) Partner enabling of substance use disorders: critical review and future directions. Am J Family Therapy 29:257–270
Rucker DD, Preacher KJ, Tormala ZL, Petty RE (2011) Mediation analysis in social psychology: current practices and new recommendations. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 5:359–371
Sampson RJ, Laub JH (1993) Crime in the making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Sampson RJ, Laub JH (1997) A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In: Thornberry TP (ed) Advances in criminological theory (vol 7: developmental theories of crime and delinquency). Transaction, New Brunswick, pp 133–161
Sampson R, Raudenbush S (1999) Systematic social observation on public spaces: a new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. Am J Sociol 105:603–651
Steffensmeier D, Allan E (1996) Gender and crime: toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annu Rev Sociol 22:459–487
Steinberg L, Dornbusch S, Darling N (1992) Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement. Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Dev 63:1266–1281
Sutherland EH, Cressey DR (1978) Criminology, 10th edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia
Tafrate RC, Mitchell D (eds) (2014) Forensic CBT: A handbook for clinical practice. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester
Udry JR (2003) The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
Varghese FP, Charlton SR, Wood M, Trower E (2014) Temporal discounting and criminal thinking: understanding cognitive processes to align services. Psychol Serv 11:171–178
Walters GD (2012) Crime in a psychological context: from career criminals to criminal careers. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Walters GD (2015a) Parental attitude toward deviance as a predictor of delinquency: Making the connection via perception and cognition. J Adolesc 39:27–35
Walters GD (2015b) Short-term goals and physically hedonistic values as mediators of the past crime–future crime relationship. Legal Criminol Psychol 20:81–95
Walters GD (in press-a) Cognitive mediation of crime continuity: a causal mediation analysis of the past crime–future crime relationship. Crime Delinq. doi:10.1177/0011128712470987
Walters GD (in press-b) Friends, cognition, and delinquency: proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects among male delinquents. Justice Q. doi:10.1080/07418825.2015.1039048
Walters GD, DeLisi M (2013) Antisocial cognition and crime continuity: Cognitive mediation of the past crime–future crime relationship. J Crim Justice 41:135–140
Walters GD, DeLisi M (2015) Psychopathy and violence: Does antisocial cognition mediate the relationship between the PCL:YV factor scores and violent offending? Law Hum Behav 39:350–359
Wechsler D (1999) Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace & Company, New York
Weinberger DA, Schwartz GE (1990) Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: a typological perspective. J Pers 58:381–417
Wilson JQ, Herrnstein R (1985) Crime and human nature. Simon and Schuster, New York
Woodworth M, Porter S (2002) In cold blood: characteristics of criminal homicides as a function of psychopathy. J Abnorm Psychol 111:436–445
Acknowledgments
Author would like to thank those associated with the Pathways to Desistance study for publicly releasing their data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walters, G.D. Crime Continuity and Psychological Inertia: Testing the Cognitive Mediation and Additive Postulates with Male Adjudicated Delinquents. J Quant Criminol 32, 237–252 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9262-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9262-9