Skip to main content
Log in

Active Constraint Set Invariancy Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Optimization

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Active constraint set invariancy sensitivity analysis is concerned with finding the range of parameter variation so that the perturbed problem has still an optimal solution with the same support set that the given optimal solution of the unperturbed problem has. However, in an optimization problem with inequality constraints, active constraint set invariancy sensitivity analysis aims to find the range of parameter variation, where the active constraints in a given optimal solution remains invariant.

For the sake of simplicity, we consider the primal problem in standard form and consequently its dual may have an optimal solution with some active constraints. In this paper, the following question is answered: “what is the range of the parameter, where for each parameter value in this range, a dual optimal solution exists with exactly the same set of positive slack variables as for the current dual optimal solution?”. The differences of the results between the linear and convex quadratic optimization problems are highlighted too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldman, A.J., Tucker, A.W.: Theory of linear programming. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Linear Inequalities and Related Systems. Annals of Mathematical Studies, vol. 38, pp. 63–97. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dantzig, G.B. (ed.): Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Roos, C., Terlaky, T., Vial, J.-P. (eds.): Theory and Algorithms for Linear Optimization: An Interior Point Approach. Wiley, Chichester (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Illés, T., Peng, J., Roos, C., Terlaky, T.: A strongly polynomial rounding procedure yielding a maximally complementary solution for P *(κ) linear complementarity problems. SIAM J. Optim. 11(2), 320–340 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Jarvis, J.J., Sherali, H.D., Bazaraa, M.S. (eds.): Linear Programming and Network Flows. Wiley, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murty, K.G. (ed.): Linear Programming. Wiley, New York (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Jansen, B., de Jong, J.J., Roos, C., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in linear programming: just be careful!. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 101, 15–28 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Karmarkar, N.K.: A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica 4, 375–395 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Adler, I., Monteiro, R.: A geometric view of parametric linear programming. Algorithmica 8, 161–176 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jansen, B., Roos, C., Terlaky, T.: An interior point approach to postoptimal and parametric analysis in linear programming. Report No. 92-21, Faculty of Technical Mathematics and Information/Computer science, Delft University of Technology (1992)

  11. Gal, T., Greenberg, H.J. (eds.): Advances in Sensitivity Analysis and Parametric Programming. Kluwer Academic, London (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenberg, H.J.: Simultaneous primal-dual right-hand-side sensitivity analysis from a primal-dual strictly complementary solution of a linear program. SIAM J. Optim. 10, 427–442 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghaffari Hadigheh, A.R., Romanko, O., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in convex quadratic optimization: simultaneous perturbation of the objective and right-hand-side vectors. Algorithmic Oper. Res. (2007, to appear)

  14. Koltai, T., Terlaky, T.: The difference between managerial and mathematical interpretation of sensitivity analysis results in linear programming. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 65, 257–274 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghaffari Hadigheh, A.R., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in linear optimization: invariant support set intervals. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169, 1158–1175 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghaffari Hadigheh, A.R., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in convex quadratic optimization: invariant support set intervals. Optimization 54(1), 59–69 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghaffari Hadigheh, A.R., Mirnia, K., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in linear and convex quadratic optimization: invariant active constraint set and invariant set intervals. Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. (INFOR) 44(2), 129–155 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dorn, W.S.: Duality in quadratic programming. Q. Appl. Math. 18, 155–162 (1960)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Berkelaar, A.B., Jansen, B., Roos, C., Terlaky, T.: An interior point approach to parametric convex quadratic programming. Working paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (1997)

  20. Nesterov, Y., Nemirovskii, A. (eds.): Interior Point Polynomial Methods in Convex Programming: Theory and Applications. SIAM, Philadelphia (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Terlaky.

Additional information

Communicated by P.M. Pardalos.

Supported by the Research Institute for Fundamental Science, Tabriz, Iran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghaffari Hadigheh, A., Mirnia, K. & Terlaky, T. Active Constraint Set Invariancy Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Optimization. J Optim Theory Appl 133, 303–315 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-007-9201-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-007-9201-5

Keywords

Navigation