Abstract
Habermas’ cosmopolitan project seeks to transform global politics into an emancipatory activity in order to compensate for the disempowering effects of globalization. The project is traced through three vicious circles which stem from Habermas’ commitment to intersubjectivity. Normative politics always raises a vicious circle because politics is only needed to the extent that an issue has become problematized through want of intersubjective agreement. At domestic level Habermas solves this problem by constitutionalizing transcendental presuppositions that political participants cannot avoid making. This fix will not work at the global level because it is pre-political as between human individuals. Habermas therefore premises cosmopolitics on the transformation of nation-states into sites of participatory politics, engagement in which will eventually ignite a global cosmopolitan consciousness. This transformation depends on the constitutionalization of existing UN structures and their enforcement of an undefined and (therefore) ‘uncontroversial’ core of human rights. Unable to ground this project in social practice, Habermas eventually disregards his own lodestar of intersubjectivity based in social practice by relying on the prediscursive concept of human dignity. This move is not merely philosophically inconsistent; it also opens the door to the moralization of politics and the imposition of human rights down the barrel of a gun.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The slide into post-political society caused by the colonization of the lifeworld by autonomous administrative and market systems was the motivation behind Between Facts and Norms.
As an example, Habermas suggests that the UN Millennium Development Goals are over-ambitious; Habermas (2007), p. 336.
Ensuring respect for human dignity was one of the core goals of the G.W. Bush administration’s National Security Strategy 2002, at 1.
The UN Secretary-General of the time, Kofi Annan, established a High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change which produced a report advocating SC reform in 2004 entitled A more secure world: Our shared responsibility (available at: http://www.un.org/secureworld/. Accessed 01 July 2013). Annan supported the proposals in his report of the following year, In larger freedom: towards development, security and human rights for all (available at: http://www.un.org/largerfreedom/. Accessed 01 July 2013).
References
Beck, Ulrich, and Natan Sznaider. 2006. A literature on cosmopolitanism: An overview. The British Journal of Sociology 57(1): 153–164.
Benhabib, Seyla. 2006. Another cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benhabib, Seyla. 2009. Claiming rights across borders: International human rights and democratic sovereignty. American Political Science Review 103(4): 691–704.
Bogdandy, Armin von. 2013. Discourse theory and international law: An interview with Jürgen Habermas. ESIL lectures. http://www.esil-sedi.eu/node/288. Accessed 24 May 2013.
Borradori, Giovanna. 2003. Philosophy in a time of terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Delahunty, Robert J., and Jon Yoo. 2010. Kant, Habermas and democratic peace. Chicago Journal of International Law 10(2): 437–474.
Douzinas, Costas. 2007. Human rights and empire: The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.
Douzinas, Costas. 2013. Philosophy and resistance in the crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Elster, John. 2000. Arguing and bargaining in two constituent assemblies. Journal of Constitutional Law 2(2): 344–421.
Engle, Karen. 2000. Culture and human rights: The Asian values debate in context. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 32: 291–333.
Fine, Robert. 2003. Taking the ‘ism’ out of cosmopolitanism. European Journal of Social Theory 6(4): 451–470.
Fine, Robert, and Will Smith. 2003. Jürgen Habermas’s theory of cosmopolitanism. Constellations 10(4): 469–487.
Giegerich, Thomas. 2009. The is and the ought of international constitutionalism: How far have we come on Habermas’ Road to a ‘well-considered constitutionalization of international law’? German Law Journal 10(1): 31–62.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The theory of communicative action. Volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987a. The theory of communicative action. Volume two: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987b. The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. Morality and ethical life: Does Hegel’s critique of Kant apply to discourse ethics? Northwestern University Law Review 83(1): 38–53.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge (US): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1995. On the internal relation between the rule of law and democracy. European Journal of Philosophy 3(1): 12–20.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996a. Between facts and norms. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996b. On the cognitive content of morality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96: 335–358.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1997. Kant’s idea of perpetual peace, with the benefit of two hundred years’ hindsight. In Perpetual peace: Essays on Kant’s cosmopolitan ideal, ed. James Bohman, and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann, 112–154. Cambridge US: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998a. Remarks on legitimation through human rights. Philosophy & Social Critique 24(2/3): 157–171.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998b. Social action, purposive activity and communication. In On the pragmatics of communication, ed. Maeve Cooke, 105–182. Cambridge (US): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Habermas, Jürgen, and Ciaran Cronin. 1998. The European nation-state: On the past and the future of sovereignty and citizenship. Public Culture 10(2): 397–416.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1999a. Bestiality and humanity: A war on the border between legality and morality. Constellations 6(3): 263–272.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1999b. A short reply. Ratio Juris 12(4): 445–453.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001a. Learning from catastrophe? In The postnational constellation, ed. Max Pensky, 38–57. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001b. The postnational constellation and the future of democracy. In The postnational constellation, ed. Max Pensky, 58–112. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2003a. Dispute on the past and future of international law. Transition from a national to a postnational constellation. Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 13: 31–39.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2003b. Interpreting the fall of a monument. German Law Journal 4(7): 701–708.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2005. Concluding remarks on empirical approaches to deliberative politics. Acta Politica 40(3): 384–392.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2006a. The divided West. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2006b. Time of transitions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2007. A political constitution for the pluralist world society. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34(3): 331–343.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2008a. The constitutionalization of international law and the legitimation problems of a constitution for world society. Constellations 15(4): 444–455.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2008b. The architectonics of discursive differentiation. In Between naturalism and religion, ed. Habermas Jürgen, 77–97. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2010. The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights. Metaphilosophy 41(4): 464–480.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2012a. The crisis of the European Union: A response. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2012b. The crisis of the European Union in the light of a constitutionalization of international law. European Journal of International Law 23(2): 335–348.
Held, David. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and realities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. 2000. The responsibility to protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
Kant, Immanuel. 1983. Perpetual peace and other essays. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Kennedy, David. 2004. The dark sides of virtue: Reassessing international humanitarianism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Kleingeld, Pauline. 1999. Six varieties of cosmopolitanism in late eighteenth-century Germany. Journal of the History of Ideas 60(3): 505–524.
Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
Pahuja, Sundhya. 2011. Decolonizing international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pogge, Thomas. 1992. Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty. Ethics 103(1): 48–75.
Rasch, William. 2000. Just war? Or just a war? Schmitt, Habermas and the cosmopolitan orthodoxy. Cardozo Law Review 21(5): 1665–1684.
Scheffler, Samuel. 1999. Conceptions of cosmopolitanism. Utilitas 11(3): 255–276.
Scheuerman, William. 2008. Global politics without global government. Political Theory 36(1): 133–151.
Schmitt, Carl. 1996. The concept of the political. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Tully, James. 2008. The unfreedom of the moderns in comparison to their ideals of constitutional democracy. Modern Law Review 65(2): 204–228.
United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, 1 UNTS XVI. http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/. Accessed 20 May 2013.
United Nations General Assembly, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10 December 1948, UN Doc. 217 A (III).
United Nations General Assembly, 2005 World Summit Outcome Document, 24 October 2005, UN Doc. A/RES/60/1.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2000. What is cosmopolitan? Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2): 227–243.
Zolo, Danilo. 1999. A cosmopolitan philosophy of international law? A realist approach. Ratio Juris 12(4): 429–444.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Phil Fennel, Ioannis Kalpouzos, Panu Minkkinen, Nell Munro and Jiří Přibáň for their invaluable comments and suggestions. Errors are, of course, my own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roele, I. The Vicious Circles of Habermas’ Cosmopolitics. Law Critique 25, 199–229 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-014-9138-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-014-9138-4