Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecological network design from occurrence data by simulating species perception of the landscape

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Ecological networks are often designed based on the degree of suitability and permeability of land cover classes, as obtained by estimating the statistical relationships between occurrence data and classes coverage using habitat suitability models (HSMs). Considering only the classes coverage, but not their spatial arrangement, frequently prevents HSMs from correctly identifying nodes and connectivity elements.

Objectives

We propose a new approach in the design of ecological networks starting from the relationship between occurrence data and both land cover classes coverage and spatial arrangement, as calculated for different simulated species perceptions of the landscape (SSPLs, corresponding to different combinations of classes alternatively assuming the role of nodes, connectivity elements, or matrix).

Methods

The approach consists of comparing the ability to explain the observed species occurrence of both the nodes coverage and the connectivity degree provided by both nodes and connectivity elements, calculated for each SSPL. The better performing SSPL will provide information about the land cover classes that should be considered in designing an ecological network for the species, as well as their role in the network.

Results

When applied to the Hazel Dormouse in an agricultural landscape in northern Italy, the method proved effective and allowed us to identify woodlands and hedgerows as nodes, and poplar cultivations, biomasses and reforestations as connectivity elements.

Conclusions

The proposed method can be adopted to identify nodes and connectivity elements for virtually every species sensitive to fragmentation, and has important practical implications when integrated in landscape management plans developed to guarantee ecological connectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson AB, Jenkins CN (2006) Applying nature’s design: corridors as a strategy for biodiversity conservation. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balkenhol N, Gugerli F, Cushman SA, Waits LP, Coulon A, Arntzen JW, Holderegger R, Wagner HH (2009) Identifying future research needs in landscape genetics: where to from here? Landscape Ecol 24:455–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bani L, Baietto M, Bottoni L, Massa R (2002) The use of focal species in designing a habitat network for a lowland area of Lombardy, Italy. Conserv Biol 16:826–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bani L, Massimino D, Bottoni L, Massa R (2006) A multiscale method for selecting indicator species and priority conservation areas: a case study for broadleaved forests in Lombardy, Italy. Conserv Biol 20:512–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bani L, Orioli V, Pisa G, Dondina O, Fagiani S, Fabbri E, Randi E, Mortelliti A, Sozio G (2017a) Landscape determinants of genetic differentiation, inbreeding and genetic drift in the hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius). Conserv Genet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-017-0999-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bani L, Orioli V, Pisa G, Fagiani S, Dondina O, Fabbri E, Randi E, Sozio G, Mortelliti A (2017b) Population genetic structure and sex-biased dispersal of the hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) in a continuous and in a fragmented landscape in central Italy. Conserv Genet 18:261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bani L, Pisa G, Luppi M, Spilotros G, Fabbri E, Randi E, Orioli V (2015) Ecological connectivity assessment in a strongly structured fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra) population. Ecol Evol 5:3472–3485

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barton K (2015) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.15.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn

  • Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beale CM, Lennon JJ (2012) Incorporating uncertainty in predictive species distribution modelling. Philos Trans R Soc B 367:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier P, Majka DR, Spencer WD (2008) Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conserv Biol 22:836–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF (2003) Linkages in the landscape: the role of corridors and connectivity in wildlife conservation. IUCN, Gland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bivand R, Bernat A, Carvalho M, Chun Y, Dormann C, Dray S, Mueller W (2005) The spdep package. Comprehensive R Archive Network, version 05-83

  • Bright PW (1998) Behavior of specialist species in habitat corridors: arboreal dormice avoid corridor gaps. Anim Behav 56:1485–1490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bright PW, Morris PA (1990) Habitat requirements of dormice Muscardinus avellanarius in relation to woodland management in Southwest England. Biol Conserv 54:307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright P, Morris P, Mitchell-Jones AJ (2006) The dormouse conservation handbook, 2nd edn. English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Büchner S (2008) Dispersal of common dormice Muscardinus avellanarius in a habitat mosaic. Acta Theriol 53:259–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capizzi D, Battistini M, Amori G (2002) Analysis of the hazel dormouse, Muscardinus avellanarius, distribution in a Mediterranean fragmented woodland. Ital J Zool 69:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiatante G, Dondina O, Lucchelli M, Bani L, Meriggi A (in press) Habitat selection of European badger Meles meles in a highly fragmented forest landscape in northern Italy: the importance of agro-forestry systems. Hystrix

  • Cliff AD, Ord JK (1981) Spatial processes. Londres, Pion, pp 63–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, Chase M, Griffin C (2010) Mapping landscape resistance to identify corridors and barriers for elephant movement in southern Africa. In: Cushman SA, Huettmann F (eds) Spatial complexity, informatics, and wildlife conservation. Springer, Tokyo, pp 349–367

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, Landguth EL, Flather CH (2013) Evaluating population connectivity for species of conservation concern in the American Great Plains. Biodivers Conserv 22:2583–2605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, Lewis JS (2010) Movement behavior explains genetic differentiation in American black bears. Landscape Ecol 25:1613–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 168:486–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies ZG, Pullin AS (2007) Are hedgerows effective corridors between fragments of woodland habitat? An evidence-based approach. Landscape Ecol 22:333–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor V, Julliard R, Jiguet F (2008) Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117:507–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dondina O, Kataoka L, Orioli V, Bani L (2016) How to manage hedgerows as effective ecological corridors for mammals: a two-species approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 231:283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dondina O, Orioli V, D’Occhio P, Luppi M, Bani L (2017) How does forest species specialization affect the application of the island biogeography theory in fragmented landscapes? J Biogeogr 44:1041–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas DH (1994) Least cost path in GIS using an accumulated cost surface and slope lines. Cartographica 3:37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ERSAF (2013) Sistema Informativo Agricolo Regione Lombardia, anno 2013 (SIARL-2013) (Agricultural Information System of Lombardy Region, year 2013). Ente Regionale per i Servizi all’Agricoltura e alle Foreste della Lombardia, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • ERSAF (2014) Destinazione d’Uso dei Suoli Agricoli e Forestali (DUSAF) (Agricultural and Forest Land Use). Ente Regionale per i Servizi all’Agricoltura e alle Foreste della Lombardia, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2011) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Europe Forest (2008) Pan-European guidelines for afforestation and reforestation with a special focus on the provisions of the UNFCCC. Forest Europe Liaison Unit, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Feced C, Saura S, Elena-Rosseló R (2011) Improving landscape connectivity in forest districts: a two-stage process for prioritizing agricultural patches for reforestation. For Ecol Manag 261:154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henein K, Wegner J, Merriam G (1998) Population effects of landscape model manipulation on two behaviorally different woodland small mammals. Oikos 81:168–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horskins K, Mather PB, Wilson JC (2006) Corridors and connectivity: when use and function do not equate. Landscape Ecol 21:641–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juskaitis R (1997) Ranging and movement of the common dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius in Lithuania. Acta Theriol 42:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juškaitis R (2008) The common dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius: ecology, population structure and dynamics. Institute of Ecology of Vilnius University Publishers, Vilnius

    Google Scholar 

  • Keckel M, Büchner S, Ansorge H (2012) Does the occurrence of the hazel dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius in East-Saxony (Germany) dependent on habitat isolation and size? Peckiana 8:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance SG, Laurance WF (1999) Tropical wildlife corridors: use of linear rainforest remnants by arboreal mammals. Biol Conserv 91:231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mateo-Sánchez MC, Balkenhol N, Cushman S, Pérez T, Domínguez A, Saura S (2015) A comparative framework to infer landscape effects on population genetic structure: are habitat suitability models effective in explaining gene flow? Landscape Ecol 30:1405–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mateo-Sánchez MC, Cushman SA, Saura S (2014) Connecting endangered brown bear subpopulations in the Cantabrian Range (north-western Spain). Anim Conserv 17:430–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman S (2005) The gradient concept of landscape structure. In: Weins J, Moss M (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 112–119

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html

  • McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology and conservation. Ecology 10:2712–2724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortelliti A, Amori G, Capizzi D, Cervone C, Fagiani S, Pollini B, Boitani L (2011) Independent effects of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation and structural connectivity on the distribution of two arboreal rodents. J Appl Ecol 48:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortelliti A, Amori G, Capizzi D, Rondinini C, Boitani L (2010) Experimental design and taxonomic scope of fragmentation studies on European mammals: current status and future priorities. Mammal Rev 40:125–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortelliti A, Santarelli L, Sozio G, Fagiani S, Boitani L (2013) Long distance field crossings by hazel dormice (Muscardinus avellanarius) in fragmented landscapes. Mamm Biol 78:309–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortelliti A, Sozio G, Driscoll DA, Bani L, Boitani L, Lindenmayer DB (2014) Population and individual-scale responses to patch size, isolation and quality in the hazel dormouse. Ecosphere 5:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF, O’Connell MA, Murphy DD (1997) The science of conservation planning. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien D, Manseau M, Fall A, Fortin MJ (2006) Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: an application of graph theory. Biol Conserv 130:70–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterman WE, Connette GM, Semlitsch RD, Eggert LS (2014) Ecological resistance surfaces predict fine-scale genetic differentiation in a terrestrial woodland salamander. Mol Ecol 23:2402–2413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pisa G, Orioli V, Spilotros G, Fabbri E, Randi E, Bani L (2015) Detecting a hierarchical genetic population structure: the case study of the Fire Salamander (Salamandra salamandra) in Northern Italy. Ecol Evol 5:743–758

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Provincia di Pavia (2012) Piano di Indirizzo Forestale Provincia di Pavia. Forest Management Plan of the Provinces of Pavia, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • Puddu G, Maiorano L (2016) Combining multiple tools to provide realistic potential distributions for the mouflon in Sardinia: species distribution models, spatial pattern analysis and circuit theory. Hystrix 27:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2014) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Reding DM, Cushman SA, Gosselink TE, Clark WR (2013) Linking movement behavior and fine-scale genetic structure to model landscape connectivity for bobcats (Lynx rufus). Landscape Ecol 28:471–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard Y, Armstrong DP (2010) Cost distance modelling of landscape connectivity and gap-crossing ability using radio-tracking data. J Appl Ecol 47:603–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saura S, Rubio L (2010) A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape. Ecography 33:523–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirk AJ, Wallin DO, Cushman SA, Rice CG, Warheit KI (2010) Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework. Mol Ecol 19:3603–3619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soulè ME, Terborgh J (1999) Continental conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks. Island Press, Covelo

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Fortin MJ, McRae BH, Scribner KIM (2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Mol Ecol 19:3576–3591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Storfer A, Murphy M, Evans J, Goldberg C, Robinson S, Spear S, Dezzani R, Delmelle E, Vierling L, Waits L (2007) Putting the ‘landscape’ in landscape genetics. Heredity 98:128–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall FH, Macdonald DW, Hart BJ, Johnson P, Manley W, Feber R (2002) Is habitat linearity important for small mammal communities on farmland? J Appl Ecol 39:643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Blanchet FG, Koper N (2014) Measuring habitat fragmentation: an evaluation of landscape pattern metrics. Methods Ecol Evol 5:634–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman TN, Cushman SA, Schwartz MK, Wallin DO (2010) Spatial scaling and multi-model inference in landscape genetics: Martes americana in northern Idaho. Landscape Ecol 25:1601–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolton R (2009) Hazel dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius (L.) nest site selection in hedgerows. Mammalia 73:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Whiteley AR (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecol 27:777–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Research Fund of the University of Milano-Bicocca. We thank Valeria Cardinale, Giorgio Desperati, Pamela D’Occhio, Leila Kataoka and Francesca Codina for their help in the field surveys. We are very grateful to Dr. Matteo Bonetti for language revision. We also thank two anonymous referees for their useful suggestions that helped improve the paper.

Funding

This study was funded by the Research Fund of the University of Milano-Bicocca.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivia Dondina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dondina, O., Orioli, V., Colli, L. et al. Ecological network design from occurrence data by simulating species perception of the landscape. Landscape Ecol 33, 275–287 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0600-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0600-1

Keywords

Navigation