Skip to main content
Log in

A Social Practice Prioritarian Response to Allen Buchanan’s The Heart of Human Rights

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Allen Buchanan’s ‘The Heart of Human Rights’ addresses the moral justification of the international legal human rights system (ILHRS). Buchanan identifies two functions of the ILHRS: a well-being function and a status egalitarian function. Because Buchanan assumes that the well-being function is sufficientarian, he augments it with a status egalitarian function. However, if the well-being function is utilitarian or prioritarian, there is no need for a separate status egalitarian function, because the status egalitarian function can be subsumed by the utilitarian or prioritarian well-being function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William J. Talbott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Talbott, W.J. A Social Practice Prioritarian Response to Allen Buchanan’s The Heart of Human Rights . Law and Philos 36, 121–133 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-016-9282-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-016-9282-0

Navigation