Abstract
This research examines whether service failure in hospitality settings reduces situational power and whether feelings of powerlessness have implications for service recovery efforts. Three studies demonstrated that service failure reduced consumers’ situational power, but only among those with high dispositional power motivation (studies 1 and 2). Moreover, those with high dispositional power motivation evinced greater satisfaction with service recovery efforts that involved status-enhancing compensation as opposed to utility-enhancing compensation (study 2), and when status-enhancing compensation was presented in public as opposed to in private (study 3). These findings suggest that consumers with high dispositional power motivation prefer service recovery attempts that counteract the feelings of powerlessness they experience from service failure. Service managers can benefit from these findings by understanding how feelings of power interact with service recovery efforts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We screened the data for duplicated IP addresses and removed responses made by participants who had completed the survey multiple times.
Participants were specifically instructed to “recall a service encounter in which you were treated (un)favorably by the service person. Please think about typical hospitality service situations such as when you were on vacation, in a resort, hotel, restaurant, or traveling for leisure.” A review of participants’ descriptions revealed that all participants wrote about hospitality-related service encounters.
Participants in the favorable service condition reported their demographic information and ended their study.
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk‐taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536.
Bell, C. R., & Zemke, R. E. (1987). Service breakdown: the road to recovery. Management review, 76, 32–35.
Bonifield, C., & Cole, C. (2007). Affective responses to service failure: anger, regret, and retaliatory versus conciliatory responses. Marketing Letters, 18, 85–99.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
Cassidy, T., & Lynn, R. (1989). A multifactorial approach to achievement motivation: the development of a comprehensive measure. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 301–312.
Crick, A. P., & Spencer, A. (2010). Hospitality quality: new directions and new challenges. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management Science, 23, 463–478.
Donthu, N., & Yoo, B. (1998). Cultural influences on services quality expectations. Journal of Service Research, 1, 178–186.
Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The accentuation bias: money literally looms larger (and sometimes smaller) to the powerless. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 199–205.
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.
Fodor, E. M. (2010). The power motive. In O. C. Schulthesis & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 3–29). NY: Oxford University Press.
Furrer, O., Liu, B. S.-G., & Sudharshan, D. (2000). The relationships between culture and service quality perceptions: basis for cross-market segmentation and resource allocation. Journal of Service Research, 2, 355–371.
Gelbrich, K., & Roschk, H. (2011). Do complainants appreciate overcompensation? A meta-analysis on the effect of simple compensation vs. overcompensation on post-complainant satisfaction. Marketing Letters, 22, 31–47.
Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., & Tsiros, M. (2008). The effect of compensation on repurchase intentions in service recovery. Journal of Retailing, 84, 424–434.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 392–404.
Guerrier, Y. (1999). Organizational behaviour in hotels and restaurants: an international perspective. NY: Wiley.
Guinote, A., & Vescio, T. K. (2010). The social psychology of power. NY: Guilford.
Harris, K. E., Grewal, D., Mohr, L. A., & Bernhardt, K. L. (2006). Consumer responses to service recovery strategies: the moderating role of online versus offline environment. Journal of Business Research, 59, 425–431.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. NY: Guilford.
Hiemer, J., & Abele, A. E. (2012). High power=Motivation? Low power=Situation? The impact of power, power stability and power motivation on risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 486–490.
Kelley, S. W., & Davis, M. A. (1994). Antecedents to customer expectations for service recovery. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 52–61.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.
Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(3), 405–416.
Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 451–462.
Mattila, A. S. (2000). The impact of culture and gender on customer evaluations of service encounters. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 24, 263–273.
McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: the inner experience. NY: Irvington.
McCollough, M. A., Berry, L. L., & Yadav, M. S. (2000). An empirical investigation of customer satisfaction after service failure and recovery. Journal of Service Research, 3, 121–137.
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.
Patterson, P. G., & Smith, T. (2001). Modeling relationship strength across service types in an Eastern culture. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12, 90–113.
Patullo, P. (1996). Last resorts: the cost of tourism in the Caribbean. IR: Kingston.
Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Desire to acquire: powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 257–267.
Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: how different levels of power shape consumer consumption. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 549–555.
Shamir, B. (1980). Between service and servility: role conflict in subordinate service roles. Human Relations, 33, 741–756.
Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N., & Wagner, J. (1999). A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 356–372.
Sokolowski, K., Schmalt, H. D., Langens, T. A., & Puca, R. M. (2000). Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: the Multi-Motive Grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 126–145.
Sparks, B. A., Bradley, G. L., & Callan, V. J. (1997). The impact of staff empowerment and communication style on consumer evaluations: the special case of service failure. Psychology and Marketing, 14, 475–493.
Tax, S. S., Brown, S. W., & Chandrashekaran, M. (1998). Customer evaluations of services complaint experiences: implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 62, 60–76.
Taylor, F. (1975). Jamaica, the welcoming society: myths and reality. IS: Kingston.
Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. NY: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, J., Newton, J.D. & Newton, F.J. Powerlessness following service failure and its implications for service recovery. Mark Lett 27, 63–75 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9303-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9303-4