Skip to main content
Log in

Robustness analysis versus reliable process reasoning

Robert Hudson: Seeing things: The philosophy of reliable observation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, xii+274pp, £41.99, $58.50 HB

  • Essay Review
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bovens, L., and S. Hartmann. 2000. Coherence, belief expansion and Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, NMR’2000, eds. Baral C., Truszczynski M, Breckenridge, Colorado.

  • Culp, S. 1994. Defending robustness: The bacterial mesosome as a test case. In PSA 1994: Proceedings of the 1994 biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association, vol. 1, ed. D. Hull, et al., 46–57. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuorikoski, J., A. Lehtinen, and C. Marchionni. 2010. Economic modelling as robustness analysis. British Journal of Philosophy of Science 61: 541–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, J. 1910. Brownian Movement and Molecular Reality. Trans. Soddy F. London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Perrin, J. 1916. Atoms. Trans. Hammick D. L. London: Constable.

  • Perrin, J. 1926. Discontinuous structure of matter. In Nobel lectures: Physics, 1922–1941, ed. Nobel Foundation, 138–164. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schupbach, J. 2011. New hope for Shogenji’s coherence measure. British Journal of Philosophy of Science 62: 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

With thanks to Alessandra Basso, Aki Lehtinen and Caterina Marchionni who took part in the reading group on Seeing Things at the University of Helsinki.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Lisciandra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lisciandra, C. Robustness analysis versus reliable process reasoning. Metascience 24, 37–41 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-014-9927-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-014-9927-2

Navigation