Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring questions about common morality

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Other interesting issues are raised in the Protagoras, such as Socrates’s thesis that no one does evil knowingly and his dispute of Protagoras’s claim that morality can be taught, but these are not as directly pertinent to the present discussion.

  2. For further discussion of this type of criticism of Gert, see Strong [12].

References

  1. Plato. 1928. Protagoras. In The works of Plato, ed. I. Edman, trans. B. Jowett, 193–260. New York: Modern Library.

  2. Kant, Immanuel. 1949. Fundamental principles of the metaphysic of morals. Trans. T.K. Abbott. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

  3. Donagan, Alan. 1977. The theory of morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gert, Bernard. 1973. The moral rules: A new rational foundation for morality. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gert, Bernard. 2005. Morality: Its nature and justification. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ross, W.D. 1988. The right and the good. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Warnock, G.J. 1971. The object of morality. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beauchamp, Tom L., and J.F. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Strong, Carson. 2008. Justifying group-specific common morality. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Engelhardt, H. Tristram Jr. 1996. The foundations of bioethics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beauchamp, Tom L. 2003. A defense of the common morality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (3): 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Strong, Carson. 2007. Review article: Gert’s theory of common morality. Metaphilosophy 38 (4): 535–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gert, Bernard, C.M. Culver, and K.D. Clouser. 2006. Bioethics: A systematic approach, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carson Strong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strong, C. Exploring questions about common morality. Theor Med Bioeth 30, 1–9 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-009-9092-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-009-9092-6

Keywords

Navigation