Abstract
Research shows that the physician’s personal attributes and social characteristics have a strong association with their end-of-life (EOL) decision making. Despite efforts to increase patient, family and surrogate input into EOL decision making, research shows the physician’s input to be dominant. Our research finds that physician’s social values, independent of religiosity, have a significant association with physician’s tendency to withhold or withdraw life sustaining, EOL treatments. It is suggested that physicians employ personal social values in their EOL medical coping, because they have to cope with existential dilemmas posed by the mystery of death, and left unresolved by medical decision making mechanisms such as advanced directives and hospital ethics committees.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asai, A., S. Fukuhara, O. Inoshita, et al. 1997. Medical decisions concerning the end of life: A discussion with Japanese physicians. Journal of Medical Ethics 23: 323–327.
Barilan, Y. 2014. Jewish bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baume, P., E. O’Malley, and A. Bauman. 1995. Professed religious affiliation and the practice of euthanasia. Journal of Medical Ethics 21: 49–54.
Bickel-Swenson, D. 2007. End- of-life training in U.S. medical schools: A systematic literature review. Journal of Palliative Medicine 10: 229–235.
Bloom, A. 1987. The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon and Shuster.
Braun, U., A. Naik, and L. Mc Gullough. 2009. Re-conceptualizing the experience of surrogate decision-making: Repots vs genuine decisions. The Annals of Family Medicine 7: 249–253.
Buford, C. 2008. Advancing an advance directive debate. Bioethics 22: 423–430.
Burkle, C., and J. Benson. 2012. End-of-life care decision: Importance of reviewing systems and limitations. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 87(11): 1098–1105.
Carmel, S. 1996. Behavior, attitudes and expectations regarding the use of life-sustaining treatments among physicians in Israel: An exploratory study. Social Science and Medicine 43(6): 955–965.
Christakis, N., and D. Asch. 1995. Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support. American Journal of Public Health 85: 367–372.
Cohen, J., J. van Delden, F. Mortire, et al. 2008. Influence of physicians’ life stances on attitudes to end-of-life decisions and actual end-of-life decision making in six countries. J Med Ethics 34: 247–253.
Green, K. l993. Jew and philosopher. Albany, NY: State Uinversity of New York Press.
Haidt, J., J. Graham, and C. Joseph. 2009. Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry 20: 110–119.
Hardart, G., and R. Truog. 2003. Attitudes and preferences of intensivists regarding the role of family interests in medical decision making for incompetent patient. Critical Care Medicine 31(7): 1895–1900.
Hinkka, H., E. Kosunen, U.-K. Lammi, et al. 2002a. Decision making in terminal care: A survey of Finnish doctors’ treatment decisions in end-of-life scenarios involving a terminal cancer and a terminal dementia patient. Palliative Medicine 16: 195–204.
Hinkka, H., E. Kosunen, R. Metsanoja, et al. 2002b. Factors affecting physicians’ decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment in terminal care. Journal of Medical Ethics 28: 109–114.
Hipshman, L. 1999. Attitudes towards in formed consent, confidentiality and substitute treatment decisions in southern African medical student: A case study from Zimbabwe. Social Science and Medicine 49: 313–328.
Kressel, L., and G. Chapman. 2007. The default effect in end-of-life medical treatment preferences. Medical Decision Making 27: 299–310.
Lang, F., and T. Quill. 2004. Making decisions with families at the end of life. American Family Physician 70(4): 719–723.
Lipp, A. 2008. A review of termination of pregnancy: Prevelant health care professional attitudes and ways of influencing them. Journal of Clinical Nursing 17(13): 1683–2000.
Lofmark, R., and T. Nilstun. 2002. Conditions and consequences of medical futility—from a literature review to a clinical model. Journal of Medical Ethics 28(2): 115–119.
Macionis, J. 2003. Sociology, 9th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Mobeireek, A., F. Al-Kassimi, A. Al-Shimemeri, et al. 2008. Information disclosure and decision-making: The middle east versus the far east and the west. Journal of Medical Ethics 34: 225–229.
Parks, W., and L. Winter. 2009. End of life decision-making for cancer patient. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice 36: 811–823.
Perkins, H. 2007. Controlling death: The false promise of advance directives. Annals of Internal Medicine 147: 51–57.
Perron N.J., F. Secretan, M. Vanotti, et al. 2003. Patient expectations at a multicultural out-patient clinic in Switzeland. Family Practice 20(4): 4280433.
Politi M.C., and R.L. Street Jr. 2011. The importance of communication in collaborative decision making: facilitating shared mind and the management of uncertainty. Evaluation Clinical Practice 17(4): 579–584.
Santonocito C., G. Ristagno, A. Gullo, et al. 2013. Do-not-resucitate order: A view throughout the world. Journal of Critical Care 1: 14–21.
Silverman, H. 1996. How decisive are physician values in end-of-life decision-making? Critical Care Medicine 24(6): 909–911.
Sittisombut, S., C. Maxwell, E. Love, et al. 2009. Physicians’ attitudes and practices regarding advanced end-of-life care planning for terminally ill patients at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand. Nursing and Health Sciences 11: 23–28.
Steinberg, A. 2003. Encyclopedia of Jewish ethics. Feldheim Publ. Jer. Israel, 1046–1088.
Sullivan, A.M., M.D. Lakoma, and S.D. Block. 2003. The status of medical education in end-of-life care: A national report. Journal of General Internal Medicine 18(9): 685–695.
Sulmasy, D., J. Cinino, et al. 2008. U.S. medical students’ perceptions of the adequacy of their schools’ curricular attention to care at the end-of-life: 1998–2006. Journal of Palliative Medicine 11(5): 707–716.
Tarcow, N., and T. Pangle. 1987. Epiogue: Leo Strauss and the history of political philosophy. In The history of political philosophy, 3rd ed, ed. L. Strauss, and J. Cropsey, L9. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
Torke, A., G. Alexander, and J. Lantos. 2008. Substituted judgment: The limitation of autonomy in surrogate decision making. Journal of General Internal Medicine 23(9): 1514–1517.
Tuschman, A. 2013. Our political nature. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.
Vig, E., H. Starks, J. Taylor, et al. 2007. Surviving surrogate decision-making: What helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others. Society of General Internal Medicine 22: 274–1279.
Vincent, J. 1999. Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: The result of an ethical questionnaire. Critical Care Medicine 27: 1626–1633.
Wenger, N., and S. Carmel. 2004a. Physicians’ religiosity and end-of-life care attitudes and behaviors. The Mt. Sinai Journal of Meicine 71(5): 335–343.
Wenger, N., and S. Carmel. 2004b. Physicians religiosity and end-of-life care attitudes and behaviors. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 7(5): 335–343.
Wu, P., K. Lorenz, and J. Chodosh. 2008. Advance care planning among the oldest old. J of Palliative Medicine 11(2): 152–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, C.J., Chen, Y., Orbach, H. et al. Social values as an independent factor affecting end of life medical decision making. Med Health Care and Philos 18, 71–80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9581-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9581-x