Abstract
Technical assessments of vulnerability and/or risk are increasingly being undertaken to assess the impacts of climate change. Underlying this is the belief that they will bring clarity to questions regarding the scale of institutional investments required, plausible adaptation policies and measures, and the timing of their implementation. Despite the perceived importance of technical assessments in 'evidence-based' decision environments, assessments cannot be undertaken independent of values and politics, nor are they capable of eliminating the uncertainty that clouds decision-making on climate adaptation As such, assessments can trigger as many questions as they answer, leaving practitioners and stakeholders to question their value. This paper explores the value of vulnerability/risk assessments in climate change adaptation planning processes as a catalyst for learning in four case studies in Southeastern Australia. Data were collected using qualitative interviews with stakeholders involved in the assessments and analysed using a social learning framework. This analysis revealed that detailed and tangible strategies or actions often do not emerge directly from technical assessments. However, it also revealed that the assessments became important platforms for social learning. In providing these platforms, assessments present opportunities to question initial assumptions, explore multiple framings of an issue, generate new information, and galvanise support for collective actions. This study highlights the need for more explicit recognition and understanding of the important role social learning plays in climate change vulnerability assessments and adaptation planning more broadly.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris C, Schön D (1974) Theory in practice. Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Armitage D, Berkes F, Dale A, Kocho-Schellenberg E, Patton E (2011) Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Glob Environ Chang 21(3):995–1004
Babbie E (2010) The practice of social research. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, USA
Berrang-Ford L, Ford JD, Paterson J (2011) Are we adapting to climate change? Glob Environ Chang 21(1):25–33
Blackmore C, Ison R, Jiggins J (2007) Social learning: an alternative policy instrument in the context of Europe’s water. Environ Sci Pol 10(6):493–498
Braun K, Kropp C (2010) Beyond speaking truth? Institutional responses to uncertainty in scientific governance. Sci Tech Hum Val 35(6):771–782
Brunner RD (1996) Policy and global change research. Clim Chang 32(2):121–147
Collins K, Ison R (2009) Editorial: living with environmental change: adaptation as social learning. Environ Pol Govern 19(6):351–357
Cundill G, Fabricius C (2009) Monitoring in adaptive co-management: toward a learning based approach. J Environ Manag 90(11):3205–11
Eakin HC, Patt A (2011) Are adaptation studies effective, and what can enhance their practical impact? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2(2):141–153
Engelhardt H, Caplan A (eds) (1987) Scientific controversies: Case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Flood R, Romm N (1996) Diversity management: Triple loop learning. Wiley
Fünfgeld H, Mcevoy D (2011) Framing climate change adaptation in policy and practice. Climate change adaptation program: Global Cities Institute. Melbourne
Gidley J, Fien J, Smith J-A, Thomsen DC, Smith TF (2009) Participatory futures methods: towards adaptability and resilience in climate-vulnerable communities. Environ Pol Govern 19:427–440
Groot A, Maarleveld M (2000) Demystifying facilitation in participatory development.. Gatekeeper Series. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London
Hinkel J (2011) Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: towards a clarification of the science-policy interface. Glob Environ Chang 21(1):198–208
Ipcc (1994) IPCC Technical guidelines for assessing climate change impacts and adaptations. In: Carter TR, Parry ML, Nishioka S, Harasawa H (eds) IPCC Special Report to the First Session of the Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, Working Group II, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. University College London and Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba
Ipcc (2007) Climate change 2007: Working group II: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Secretariat, Geneva
Ison RL (2009) How to act in a climate change world. Systems practice, systemic inquiry and action research. Springer, London
Jasanoff S, Wynne B (eds) (1998) Science and decisionmaking. Battelle, Washington, DC
Johnston E, Kortens A (2010) Appreciative surprise: a strategic approach to generating reflexive responses to meet the challenges of 21st-century corporate citizenship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 37
Keen M, Brown VA, Dyball R (2005) Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, Sterling
Lawrence E (1998) Some thoughts on turning a government organization into a learning organization. Public Service Commission
Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E (eds) (2004) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies and measures. United Nations Development Programme, New York
Lowe T (2006) Vicarious experience vs. scientific information in climate change risk perception and behaviour: a case study of undergraduate students in Norwich, UK. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich
Maarleveld M, Dangbégnon C (1999) Managing natural resources: a social learning perspective. Agr Hum Val 16:267–280
Martin B, Richards E (1995) Scientific knowledge, controversy, and public decision-making. In: Jasanoff S, Markle G, Petersen J, Pinch T (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage, Newbury Park
Martin J, Rogers M, Winter C (2010) Social Learning and Adaptation. Centre for Sustainable Regional Communities. Climate Change in Regional Australia, Bendigo
Muro M, Jeffrey P (2008) A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. J Environ Plan Manag 51(3):325–344
O’brien G, O’keefe P, Gadema Z, Swords J (2010) Approaching disaster management through social learning. Disast Prev Manag 19(4):498–508
Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Towards sustainability in the water sector - The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat Sci 64(4):394–411
Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Chang 19(3):354–365
Pahl-Wostl C, Hare M (2004) Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. Community Appl Soc Pyschol 14:193–206
Pelling M, High C (2005) Social learning and adaptation to climate change. Disaster Studies. Benfield Hazard Research Centre, London
Preston B, Kay R (2010) Managing climate risk in human settlements. In: Jubb I, Holper P, Cai W (eds) Managing climate change: papers from the Greenhouse 2009 Conference. 2010 CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne
Preston B, Westaway R (2010) A critical look at the state of climate adaptation planning. In: PN, Holper, Cai W (eds) Greenhouse 2009 Conference. CSIRO
Preston BL, Westaway RM, Yuen EJ (2011a) Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16(4):404–438
Preston BL, Yuen EJ, Westaway RM (2011b) Putting climate vulnerability on the map: a critical look at approaches, benefits, and risks. Sustainability Science
Röling NG, Leeuwis C, Pyburn R (eds) (2002) Wheelbarrows full of frogs: social learning in rural resource management, Van Gorcum. Assen, Netherlands
Sarewitz D, Pielke RA Jr (1999) Prediction in science and policy. Technol Soc 21:121–133
Sharples C, Attwater C, Ellison J, Stephenson W (2008) The Changing Coast - Providing Room for Natural Adjustments. In: IPWEA National Conference on Climate Change. Coffs Harbour, August 2008 Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia
Siebenhüner B (2006) Social learning in the field of climate change. Draft Paper
Simon H (ed) (1957) A behavioral model of rational choice. Wiley, New York
Stafford-Smith M, Horrocks L, Harvey A, Hamilton C (2010) Rethinking adaptation for a 4°C world. Phil Trans Math Phys Eng Sci 369(1934):196–216
Stern PD, Fineberg HV (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C
Tjosvold D (1991) The conflict-positive organization: stimulate diversity and create unity. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Undp—Gef (2003) The adaptation policy framework: user’s guidebook. UNDP, New York
Walters CJ, Holling CS (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecol Soc 71(6):2060–2068
Wilder M, Scott CA, Pablos NP, Varady RG, Garfin GM (2010) Adapting across boundaries: Climate change, social learning, and resilience in the U.S.-Mexico border region Annals of the American Association of Geographers (Special Issue on Climate Change) 100 (4): 917–928
Willows R, Connell R (2003) Climate ad1aptation: risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP Technical Report. UKCIP, Oxford
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the project managers of the four case studies for their support, all the interviewees who gave up their time to be interviewed, the reviewers for their valuable comments and the CSIRO Climate Change Adaptation Flagship who funded the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yuen, E., Jovicich, S.S. & Preston, B.L. Climate change vulnerability assessments as catalysts for social learning: four case studies in south-eastern Australia. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 18, 567–590 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9376-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9376-4