Skip to main content
Log in

Genomic structure, expression and association study of the porcine FSD2

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fibronectin type III and SPRY domain containing 2 (FSD2) on porcine chromosome 7 is considered a candidate gene for pork quality, since its two domains, which were present in fibronectin and ryanodine receptor. The fibronectin type III and SPRY domains were first identified in fibronectin and ryanodine receptor, respectively, which are candidate genes for meat quality. The aim of this study was to elucidate the genomic structure of FSD2 and functions of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within FSD2 that are related to meat quality in pigs. Using a bacterial artificial chromosome clone sequence, we revealed that porcine FSD2 consisted of 13 exons encoding 750 amino acids. In addition, FSD2 was expressed in heart, longissimus dorsi muscle, psoas muscle, and tendon among 23 kinds of porcine tissues tested. A total of ten SNPs, including four missense mutations, were identified in the exonic region of FSD2, and two major haplotypes were obtained based on the SNP genotypes of 633 Berkshire pigs. Both haplotypes were associated significantly with intramuscular fat content (IMF, P < 0.020) and moisture percentage (MP, P < 0.002). Moreover, haplotype 2 was associated with meat color, affecting yellowness (P = 0.002). These haplotype effects were further supported by the alteration of putative protein structures with amino acid substitutions. Taken together, our results suggest that FSD2 haplotypes are involved in regulating meat quality including IMF, MP, and meat color in pigs, and may be used as meaningful molecular makers to identify pigs with preferable pork quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ernst CW, Steibel JP (2013) Molecular advances in QTL discovery and application in pig breeding. Trends Genet 29:215–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson L, Haley CS, Ellegren H, Knott SA, Johansson M, Andersson K, Andersson-Eklund L, Edfors-Lilja I, Fredholm M, Hansson I (1994) Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Science 263:1771–1774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paszek A, Wilkie P, Flickinger G, Miller LM, Louis C, Rohrer G, Alexander L, Beattie C, Schook L (2001) Interval mapping of carcass and meat quality traits in a divergent swine cross. Anim Biotechnol 12:155–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ovilo C, Clop A, Noguera J, Oliver M, Barragan C, Rodriguez C, Silió L, Toro M, Coll A, Folch J (2002) Quantitative trait locus mapping for meat quality traits in an Iberian × Landrace F pig population. J Anim Sci 80:2801–2808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Harmegnies N, Davin F, De Smet S, Buys N, Georges M, Coppieters W (2006) Results of a whole-genome quantitative trait locus scan for growth, carcass composition and meat quality in a porcine four-way cross. Anim Genet 37:543–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sato S, Hasebe H, Asahi Y, Hayashi T, Kobayashi E, Sugimoto Y (2006) High-resolution physical mapping and construction of a porcine contig spanning the intramuscular fat content QTL. Anim Genet 37:113–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bork P, Doolittle RF (1992) Proposed acquisition of an animal protein domain by bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:8990–8994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Carsons SE (1989) Fibronectin in health and disease. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hynes RO (2012) Fibronectins. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ponting C, Schultz J, Bork P (1997) SPRY domains in ryanodine receptors (Ca(2 +)-release channels). Trends Biochem Sci 22:193–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fujii J, Otsu K, Zorzato F, De Leon S, Khanna VK, Weiler JE, O’Brien PJ, MacLennan DH (1991) Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 253:448–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeon JT, Park EW, Jeon HJ, Kim TH, Lee KT, Cheong IC (2003) A large-insert porcine library with sevenfold genome coverage: a tool for positional cloning of candidate genes for major quantitative traits. Mol Cells 16:113–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Horwitz W, Senzel A, Reynolds H, Park DL (1975) Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Association of Official Analytical Chemists

  14. Kel AE, Gößling E, Reuter I, Cheremushkin E, Kel-Margoulis OV, Wingender E (2003) MATCHTM: a tool for searching transcription factor binding sites in DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3576–3579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P (2001) A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet 68:978–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacob M, Gallinaro H (1989) The 5′ splice site: phylogetic evalution and variable geometry of association with U1RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 17:2159–2180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Carim-Todd L, Escarceller M, Estivill X, Sumoy L (2001) Characterization of human FSD1, a novel brain specific gene on chromosome 19 with paralogy to 9q31. BBA-Gene Struc Expr 1518:200–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weintraub H, Davis R, Lockshon D, Lassar A (1990) MyoD binds cooperatively to two sites in a target enhancer sequence: occupancy of two sites is required for activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:5623–5627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandez X, Monin G, Talmant A, Mourot J, Lebret B (1999) Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat-1. Composition of the lipid fraction and sensory characteristics of m. longissimus lumborum. Meat Sci 53:59–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huff-Lonergan EJ, Baas TJ, Malek M, Dekkers J, Prusa KJ, Rothschild MF (2002) Correlations among selected pork quality traits. J Anim Sci 80:617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cameron N (1990) Genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass traits, meat and eating quality traits in pigs. Livest Prod Sci 26:119–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mancini R, Hunt M (2005) Current research in meat color. Meat Sci 71:100–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gjerlaug-Enger E, Aass L, Ødegård J, Vangen O (2010) Genetic parameters of meat quality traits in two pig breeds measured by rapid methods. Animal 4:1832–1843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Risvik E (1994) Sensory properties and preferences. Meat Sci 36:67–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by 15-51 Agenda research (PJ01022002) from the National Institute of Animal Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae-Hun Kim.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 344 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, KS., Lee, KT., Lee, SW. et al. Genomic structure, expression and association study of the porcine FSD2 . Mol Biol Rep 43, 1011–1018 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-016-4029-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-016-4029-4

Keywords

Navigation