Skip to main content
Log in

A molecular genome scan to identify DNA segments associated with live weight in Japanese quail

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Japanese quail is an animal model in biological studies and also a commercial bird for eggs and meat production. This study was conducted to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting live weight in Japanese quail. An F2 mapping population was developed by crossing two diverse lines (meat type and egg layer) of Japanese quail. A total number of 34 F1 and 422 F2 progeny were produced by reciprocal crossing of eight pairs of parental birds. All the birds from three generations were genotyped for SSR markers that were spread across all the autosomal linkage groups. The studied traits were hatching weight and live weights at 1–5 weeks of age. QTL analysis was conducted by the regression interval mapping. Significant QTL were detected on chromosomes 1, 2, 3 (chromosome-wide significant) and 5 (genome-wide significant, P < 0.05) for body weight. Although the additive effect of the detected QTL on chromosome 5 was significant, the dominance and imprinting effects were not significant. This finding is the first report of a genome-wide significant QTL associated with live weight in Japanese quail. Our results point out to candidate DNA regions affecting live weight, a trait of great economic relevance to the Japanese quail breeding. Although these results enhance our current knowledge about the genetic control of live weight in the Japanese quail, it should be noted that the initial QTL results from the experimental designs such as backcross or F2 cannot be applied directly to the breeding programs and require further validation within the commercial lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobsson L, Park H, Wahlberg P, Fredriksson R, Perez-Enciso M, Siegel P, Andersson L (2005) Many QTLs with minor additive effects are associated with a large difference in growth between two selection lines in chickens. Genet Res 86:115–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Esmailizadeh AK (2010) A partial genome scan to identify quantitative trait loci affecting birthweight in kermani sheep. Small Rumin Res 94:73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Groenen MA, Cheng HH, Bumstead N (2000) A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome. Genome Res 10:137–147

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kayang BB, Vignal A, Inoue-Murayama M, Miwa M, Monvosin JL, Ito S, Minvieele F (2004) A first-generation microsatellite linkage map of the Japanese quail. Anim Genet 35:195–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Minvielle F, Kayang BB, Inoue-Murayama M, Miwa M, Vignal A, Gourichon D, Neau A, Monvoisin JL, Ito S (2005) Microsatellite mapping of QTL affecting growth, feed consumption, egg production, tonic immobility and body temperature of Japanese quail. BMC Genom 6:87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Esmailizadeh AK, Baghizadeh A, Ahmadizadeh M (2012) Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting bodyweight on chromosome 1 in a commercial strain of Japanese quail. Anim Prod Sci 52:64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seaton G, Hernandez J, Grunchec JA, White I, Allen J, de Koning DJ, Wei W, Berry D, Halley C, Knott SA (2006) GridQTL: a grid portal for QTL mapping of compute intensive datasets. In: Proceedings of 8th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Belo Horizonte, 13–18 August 2006

  8. Carlborg O, Kerje S, Schutz K, Jacobsson L, Jensen P, Andersson L (2003) A global search reveals epistatic interaction between QTL for early growth in the chicken. Genome Res 13:413–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Rouzic A, Alvarez-Castro JM, Carlborg O (2008) Dissection of the genetic architecture of body weight in chicken reveals the impact of epistasis on domestication traits. Genetics 179:1591–1599

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shibusawa M, Minai S, Nishida-Umehara C, Suzuki T, Mano T, Yamada K, Namikawa T, Matsuda Y (2001) A comparative cytogenetic study of chromosome homology between chicken and Japanese quail. Cytogenet Cell Genet 95(1–2):103–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang SZ, Hu XX, Wang ZP, Li XC, Wang QG, Wang YX, Tang ZQ, Li H (2012) Quantitative trait loci associated with body weight and abdominal fat traits on chicken chromosomes 3, 5 and 7. Genet Mol Res 11(2):956–965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li H, Deeb N, Zhou H, Mitchell AD, Ashwell CM, Lamont SJ (2003) Chicken quantitative trait loci for growth and body composition associated with transforming growth factor-beta genes. Poult Sci 82:347–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou H, Deeb N, Evock-Clover CM, Ashwell CM, Lamont SJ (2006) Genome-wide linkage analysis to identify chromosomal regions affecting phenotypic traits in the chicken: growth and average daily gain. Poult Sci 85:1700–1711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nie QH, Fang MX, Xie L, Shen X, Liu J, Luo ZP, Shi JJ, Zhang XQ (2010) Associations of ATGL gene polymorphisms with chicken growth and fat traits. J Appl Genet 51:185–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. Esmailizadeh or Dong-Dong Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iranmanesh, M., Esmailizadeh, A., Mohammad Abadi, M.R. et al. A molecular genome scan to identify DNA segments associated with live weight in Japanese quail. Mol Biol Rep 43, 1267–1272 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-016-4059-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-016-4059-y

Keywords

Navigation