Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Killing Activity of Micafungin Against Candida albicans, C. dubliniensis and Candida africana in the Presence of Human Serum

  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared killing activity of micafungin in time-kill experiments in RPMI-1640 with and without 50% serum against Candida albicans, Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana reference strains and clinical isolates. Killing rates (k values) were determined for each strain and concentration. In RPMI-1640 MIC ranges were 0.015–0.03, 0.015–0.03 and 0.015 mg/L against C. albicans, C. dubliniensis and C. africana, respectively. In 50% serum MIC values for the three species increased 16- to 64-fold. In RPMI-1640 micafungin was fungicidal against two of three C. albicans isolates at 16 and 32 mg/L within 14.54 h and fungistatic against all C. africana and C. dubliniensis. Fifty per cent serum significantly decreased the growth rate of C. africana, but not of the other two species; weak in vivo replication ability of C. africana was confirmed in murine model. In 50% serum micafungin at 0.25 and 1 mg/L did not inhibit any of the three species (k values were always negative). Micafungin killing rate in 50% serum at 4, 16 and 32 mg/L was significantly decreased for C. albicans, but increased for C. dubliniensis compared to RPMI-1640. Killing activity of micafungin against C. africana was comparable or higher in 50% serum than in RPMI-1640. Although micafungin is a highly protein-bound drug, it was equally effective against the species of the C. albicans complex in 50% serum at therapeutic trough concentration (4 mg/L). Both in vitro and in vivo data confirmed the low virulence of C. africana compared to the two sibling species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:133–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pfaller MA, Neofytos D, Diekema D, Azie N, Meier-Kriesche HU, Quan SP, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 3648 patients: data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH Alliance®) registry, 2004-2008. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;74:323–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perea S, Lopez-Ribot JL, Wickes BL, Kirkpatrick WR, Dib OP, Bachmann SP, et al. Molecular mechanisms of fluconazole resistance in Candida dubliniensis isolates from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1695–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Majoros L, Kardos G, Szabó B, Kovács M, Maráz A. Fluconazole susceptibility testing of Candida inconspicua clinical isolates: comparison four method. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55:275–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Majoros L, Szegedi I, Kardos G, Erdesz C, Konya J, Kiss C. Slow response of invasive Candida krusei infection to amphotericin B in a clinical time-kill study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;25:803–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen MH, Clancy CJ, Yu VL, Yu YC, Morris AJ, Snydman DR, et al. Do in vitro susceptibility data predict the microbiologic response to amphotericin B? Results of a prospective study of patients with Candida fungemia. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:425–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Perlin DS, Shor E, Zhao Y. Update on antifungal drug resistance. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. 2015;2:84–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;2016(62):e1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Perlin DS. Echinocandin resistance, susceptibility testing and prophylaxis: implications for patient management. Drugs. 2014;74:1573–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Emri T, Majoros L, Tóth V, Pócsi I. Echinocandins: production and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:3267–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lortholary O, Renaudat C, Sitbon K, Madec Y, Denoeud-Ndam L, Wolff M, et al. Worrisome trends in incidence and mortality of candidemia in intensive care units (Paris area, 2002–2010). Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1303–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang E, Farmakiotis D, Yang D, McCue DA, Kantarjian HM, Kontoyiannis DP. The ever-evolving landscape of candidaemia in patients with acute leukaemia: non-susceptibility to caspofungin and multidrug resistance are associated with increased mortality. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:2362–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Colombo AL, Guimarães T, Sukienik T, Pasqualotto AC, Andreotti R, Queiroz-Telles F, et al. Prognostic factors and historical trends in the epidemiology of candidemia in critically ill patients: an analysis of five multicenter studies sequentially conducted over a 9-year period. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1489–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jung DS, Farmakiotis D, Jiang Y, Tarrand JJ, Kontoyiannis DP. Uncommon Candida species fungemia among cancer patients, Houston, Texas, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:1942–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard. 3rd ed. M27-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA; 2008.

  16. Garcia-Effron GS, Park S, Perlin DS. Improved detection of Candida sp. fks hot spot mutants by using the method of the CLSI M27-A3 Document with the addition of bovine serum albumin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:2245–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishikawa J, Maeda T, Matsumura I, Yasumi M, Ujiie H, Masaie H, et al. Antifungal activity of micafungin in serum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:4559–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Földi R, Kovács R, Gesztelyi R, Kardos G, Berényi R, Juhász B, et al. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo efficacy of caspofungin against Candida parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, C. metapsilosis and C. albicans. Mycopathologia. 2012;74:311–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kovács R, Gesztelyi R, Berényi R, Domán M, Kardos G, Juhász B. Killing rates exerted by caspofungin in 50% serum and its correlation with in vivo efficacy in a neutropenic murine model against Candida krusei and C. inconspicua. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63:186–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Doman M, Kovacs R, Kardos G, Gesztelyi R, Juhasz B, Bozo A. Killing rates of caspofungin in 50 percent serum correlate with caspofungin efficacy against Candida albicans in a neutropenic murine model. Curr Drug Deliv. 2016;13:255–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saleh Q, Kovács R, Kardos G, Gesztelyi R, Kardos T, Bozó A, et al. Decreased killing activity of micafungin against Candida guilliermondii, Candida lusitaniae, and Candida kefyr in the presence of human serum. Microb Drug Resist. 2017. doi:10.1089/mdr.2016.0241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nasar A, Ryan L, Frei CR, Cota JM, Wiederhold NP. Influence of serum and albumin on echinocandin in vitro potency and pharmacodynamics. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2013;7:89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maki K, Matsumoto S, Watabe E, Iguchi Y, Tomishima M, Ohki H, et al. Use of a serum-based antifungal susceptibility assay to predict the in vivo efficacy of novel echinocandin compounds. Microbiol Immunol. 2008;52:383–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Somogyvari F, Doczi I, Serly I, Ahmad S, Nagy E. Rapid discrimination between Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis by using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;58:367–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gil-Alonso S, Jauregizar N, Cantón E, Eraso E, Quindós G. Comparison of the in vitro activity of echinocandins against Candida albicans, Candida dubliniensis, and Candida africana by time-kill curves. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;82:57–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goto N, Hara T, Tsurumi H, Ogawa K, Kitagawa J, Kanemura N, et al. Efficacy and safety of micafungin for treating febrile neutropenia in hematological malignancies. Am J Hematol. 2010;85:872–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cantón E, Pemán J, Hervás D, Espinel-Ingroff A. Examination of the in vitro fungicidal activity of echinocandins against Candida lusitaniae by time-killing methods. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:864–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Andes D, Arendrup MC, Brown SD, Lockhart SR, et al. Clinical breakpoints for the echinocandins and Candida revisited: integration of molecular, clinical, and microbiological data to arrive at species-specific interpretive criteria. Drug Resist Updat. 2011;14:164–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pfaller MA, Castanheira M, Diekema DJ, Messer SA, Jones RN. Triazole and echinocandin MIC distributions with epidemiological cutoff values for differentiation of wild-type strains from non-wild-type strains of six uncommon species of Candida. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3800–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Petty LA, Gallan AJ, Detrick JA, Ridgway JP, Mueller J, Pisano J. Candida dubliniensis pneumonia: a case report and review of literature. Mycopathologia. 2016;181:765–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Carr MJ, Clarke S, O’Connell F, Sullivan DJ, Coleman DC, O’Connell B. First reported case of endocarditis caused by Candida dubliniensis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3023–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Jabra-Rizk MA, Johnson JK, Forrest G, Mankes K, Meiller TF, Venezia RA. Prevalence of Candida dubliniensis fungemia at a large teaching hospital. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:1064–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Khan Z, Ahmad S, Joseph L, Chandy R. Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32952.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. van Hal S, Stark JD, Harkness J, Marriott D. Candida dubliniensis meningitis as delayed sequela of treated C. dubliniensis fungemia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:327–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Romeo O, Criseo G. Candida africana and its closest relatives. Mycoses. 2011;54:475–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yazdanparast SA, Khodavaisy S, Fakhim H, Shokohi T, Haghani I, Nabili M, et al. Molecular characterization of highly susceptible Candida africana from vulvovaginal candidiasis. Mycopathologia. 2015;180:317–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Borman AM, Szekely A, Linton CJ, Palmer MD, Brown P, Johnson EM. Epidemiology, antifungal susceptibility, and pathogenicity of Candida africana isolates from the United Kingdom. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:967–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Grau S, Luque S, Campillo N, Samsó E, Rodríguez U, García-Bernedo CA, et al. Plasma and peritoneal fluid population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in post-surgical patients with severe peritonitis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:2854–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lempers VJ, Schouten JA, Hunfeld NG, Colbers A, van Leeuwen HJ, Burger DM, et al. Altered micafungin pharmacokinetics in intensive care unit patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:4403–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Nguyen TH, Hoppe-Tichy T, Geiss HK, Rastall AC, Swoboda S, Schmidt J, et al. Factors influencing caspofungin plasma concentrations in patients of a surgical intensive care unit. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:100–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zomp A, Bookstaver PB, Ahmed Y, Turner JE, King C. Micafungin therapy in a critically ill, morbidly obese patient. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:2678–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yamada N, Kumada K, Kishino S, Mochizuki N, Ohno K, Ogura S. Distribution of micafungin in the tissue fluids of patients with invasive fungal infections. J Infect Chemother. 2011;17:731–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wahidi MM, Willner DA, Snyder LD, Hardison JL, Chia JY, Palmer SM. Diagnosis and outcome of early pleural space infection following lung transplantation. Chest. 2009;135:484–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Huang LL, Xia HH, Zhu SL. Ascitic fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of ascites: focus on cirrhotic ascites. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2014;2:58–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Shields RK, Nguyen MH, Press EG, Clancy CJ. Abdominal candidiasis is a hidden reservoir of echinocandin resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:7601–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Guillermo Quindós for the C. africana clinical isolate. Micafungin pure powder was kindly provided by Astellas. R. Kovács was supported by the TÁMOP 4.2.4. A/2-11-1-2012-0001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to László Majoros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kovács, R., Saleh, Q., Bozó, A. et al. Killing Activity of Micafungin Against Candida albicans, C. dubliniensis and Candida africana in the Presence of Human Serum. Mycopathologia 182, 979–987 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-017-0178-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-017-0178-9

Keywords

Navigation