Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

No more shall we part: Quantifiers in English comparatives

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well known that the interpretation of quantificational expressions in the comparative clause poses a serious challenge for semantic analyses of the English comparative. In this paper, we develop a new analysis of the comparative clause designed to meet this challenge, in which a silent occurrence of the negative degree quantifier no (observed overtly in collocations like no more, no greater, etc.) interacts with other quantificational expressions to derive the observed range of interpretations. Although our analysis incorporates ideas from previous analyses (in particular, negation and maximality based analyses of the comparative clause), we show that it is able to account for a broader range of facts than other approaches, with a minimum of construction-specific stipulations. We demonstrate that the analysis can be embedded within a general syntactic and semantic architecture for the comparative, and although our analysis focuses on the English data, we give evidence of its potential for crosslinguistic application. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our approach for the analysis of “split-scope” phenomena in nominal quantification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abels Klaus, Maria Luisa Martí. (2010) A unified approach to split scope. Natural Language Semantics 18: 435–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alrenga, Peter, Christopher Kennedy, and Jason Merchant. 2012. A new standard of comparison. In Proceedings of 30th West Coast Conference on Linguistics, ed. Nathan Arnett and Ryan Bennett, 32–42. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

  • Aparicio Terrasa, Helena. 2013. Additive readings in Spanish amount comparatives. Poster presented at Sinn und Bedeutung 18, Sept. 2013, University of the Basque Country.

  • Barker Chris. (2007) Parasitic scope. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 407–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck Sigrid. (2012) DegP scope revisited. Natural Language Semantics 20: 227–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck Sigrid. (2010) Quantifiers in than-clauses. Semantics and Pragmatics 3: 1–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Sigrid, Sveta Krasikova, Daniel Fleischer, Remus Gergel, Stefan Hofstetter, Christiane Savelsberg, John Vanderelst, and Elisabeth Villalta. 2009. Crosslinguistic variation in comparative constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 9:1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt Rajesh., Roumyana Pancheva. (2004) Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt Rajesh., Shoichi Takahashi. (2011) Reduced and unreduced phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 581–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasoveanu Adrian. (2013) Modified numerals as post-suppositions. Journal of Semantics 30: 155–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan Joan. (1973) Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 275–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Büring, Daniel. 2007. More or less. In Papers from the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society Volume 1: The Main Session, ed. Malcolm Elliott et al. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Socitey.

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In Structures and beyond, ed. Adriana Belletti, 39–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal syntax, ed. Peter Culicover, Tom Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.

  • Cormack, Anabel, and Neil Smith. 2002. Modals and negation in English. In Modality and its interaction with the verbal system, ed. Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema, and Wim van der Wurff, 133–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Cresswell, M.J. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Montague grammar, ed. Barbara Partee, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.

  • Dalrymple, Mary, Makoto Kanazawa, Yookyung Kim, Sam Mchombo, and Stanley Peters. 1998. Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21:159–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swart, Henriëtte. 2000. Scope ambiguities with negative quantifiers. In Reference and anaphoric relations, ed. Klaus von Heusinger and Urs Egli, 109–132. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Diesing Molly. (1992) Indefinites. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox Danny., Martin Hackl. (2007) The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 157–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francez, Itamar. 2007. Existential propositions. Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Gajewski, Jon. 2008. More on quantifiers in comparative clauses. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 18, ed. Tova Friedman and Satoshi Ito, 340–357. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

  • Gawron Jean-Mark. (1995) Comparatives, superlatives and resolution. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 333–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, Bart. 1996. On no. Journal of Semantics 13:67–86.

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Giannakidou Anastasia. (1999) Affective dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 367–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2006. Only, emotive factive verbs, and the dual nature of polarity dependency. Language 82:575–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Suwon Yoon. 2010. No NPI licensing in comparatives. In Proceedings of the 46th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  • Grano Thomas., Christopher Kennedy. (2012) Mandarin transitive comparatives and the grammar of measurement. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21: 219–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackl, Martin. 2000. Comparative quantifiers. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.

  • Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Why there are two ‘than’s in English. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark, and Ann Weiser, 179–191. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  • Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Ms., University of Texas, Austin, TX.

  • Heim, Irene. 2000. Degree operators and scope. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory 10, ed. Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews, 40–64. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

  • Heim, Irene. 2001. Degree operators and scope. In Audiatur vox sapientae, ed. Caroline Féry and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 214–239. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

  • Heim, Irene. 2006a. “Little”. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 16, ed. Masayuki Gibson and Jonathan Howell, 17–34. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

  • Heim, Irene. 2006b. Notes on comparative clauses as generalized quantifiers. Ms. MIT.

  • Horn Laurence. (1989) A natural history of negation. IL: University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, Sabine, and Ivy Sichel. 2011. Negative DPs, A-movement, and scope diminishment. Linguistic Inquiry 42:595–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionin Tania., Ora Matushansky. (2006) The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics 23: 315–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izvorski, Roumyana. 1995. A solution to the subcomparative paradox. In The Proceedings of WCCFL 14, ed. J. Camacho, L. Chouieri, and M. Watanabe, 203–219. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

  • Jacobs Joachim. (1980) Lexical decomposition in Montague Grammar. Theoretical Linguistics 7: 121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. On the quantification force of english free relatives. In Quantification in natural languages, ed. Emmon Bach, et al., 451–486. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Joly, André. 1967. Negation and the comparative particle in English. Québec: Pressses de L’Université Laval.

  • Kadmon, Nirit, and Fred Landman. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16:353–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 1999. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland (1997 UCSC PhD dissertation).

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 2001. Polar opposition and the ontology of ‘degrees’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24:33–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 2007a. Modes of comparison. In Papers from the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society Volume 1: The Main Session, ed. Malcolm Elliott, et al., 139–163. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 2007b. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 30:1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 2013. A scalar semantics for scalar readings of number words. In From grammar to meaning: The spontaneous logicality of language, ed. Ivano Caponigro and Carlo Cecchetto, 172–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kennedy, Christopher, and Beth Levin. 2008. Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse, ed. Louise McNally and Christopher Kennedy, 156–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kennedy Christopher., Jason Merchant. (2000) Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 89–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher, and Jason Stanley. 2009. On average. Mind 118.

  • Klein, Ewan. 1980. A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4:1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasikova, Sveta. 2008. Quantifiers in comparatives. In Proceedings of SuB12, ed. Atle Grønn, 337–352. Oslo: ILOS.

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and contextual expression, ed. Renate Bartsch, Johann van Benthem, and Peter van Emde Boas, 75–115. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

  • Krifka Manfred., (1995) The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 25: 209–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, Bill. 1979. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relation. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

  • Landau, Idan. 2002. (Un)interpretable Neg in Comp. Linguistic Inquiry 33:465–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred. (2004) Indefinites and the type of sets. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson Richard K. (1988) Scope and comparatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, Daniel. 2012. Quantificational and modal interveners in degree constructions. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 22. Ms., Stanford University.

  • Lechner, Winfried. 2001. Reduced and phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19:683–735. Unpublished ms., Universität Tübingen.

  • Linebarger, Marcia. 1980. The grammar of negative polarity. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT. Distributed by MITWPL.

  • Marques, Rui. 2003. Licensing and interpretation of N-words in comparative clauses. In Proceedings of Sinn and Bedeutung 7, ed. Matthias Weisgerber, 199–212. Universität Konstanz.

  • Matushansky, Ora. 2011. No more no less: Existential comparatives revisited. Unpublished ms., University of Utrecht.

  • McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1973. Comparative constructions in English: A syntactic and semantic analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rochester.

  • Meier, Cécile. 2002. Maximality and minimality in comparatives. In Proceedings of Sinn and Bedeutung 6, ed. Graham Katz, Sabine Reinhard, and Philip Reuter, 275–287. Osnabrück: Publications of the Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück.

  • Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Merchant Jason. (2009) Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Greek and the abstractness of syntax. Journal of Greek Linguistics 9: 134–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittwoch Anita. (1974) Is there an underlying negative element in comparative clauses?. Linguistics 12: 39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. Lynne. 1997. Why adjectives occor (or don’t) in measure phrases. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, Chicago, IL, January 2–5, 1997.

  • Musolino, Julien, Stephen Crain, and Rosalind Thornton. 2000. Navigating negative quantificational space. Linguistics 38:1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli Donna Jo., Marina Nespor. (1976) Negatives in comparatives. Language 52: 811–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel Bernhard. (2010) Generic comparisons. Journal of Semantics 27: 207–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouwen, Rick. 2008. Upper-bounded no more: The exhaustive interpretation of non-strict comparison. Natural Language Semantics 16:271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nouwen Rick. (2010) Two kinds of modified numerals. Semantics and Pragmatics 3: 1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pancheva, Roumyana. 2006. Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Slavic. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 14: The Princeton Meeting, ed. J. Lavine, et al., 236–257. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.

  • Penka Doris. (2011) Negative indefinites. UK: Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Penka Doris. (2012) Split scope of negative indefinites. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 517–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, Christopher. 2000. When even no’s Neg is splitsville. In Jorge Hankamer Webfest, ed. Sandra Chung, James McCloskey, and Nathan Sanders. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center.

  • Price, Susan. 1990. Comparative constructions in Spanish and French syntax. New York: Blackwell.

  • Rett, Jessica. 2008. Degree modification in natural language. Doctoral Dissertation, Rutgers University.

  • Ross, John Robert. 1968. A proposed rule of tree-pruning. In Modern studies in English: Readings in transformational grammar, ed. David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane, 288–299. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Rothstein, Susan. 2011. Counting, measuring and the semantics of classifiers. In The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6.

  • Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Sauerland, Uli. 1998. Plurals, derived predicates and reciprocals. In The interpretive tract, MITWPL 25, ed. Uli Sauerland and Orin Percus, 177–204. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Schwarzschild Roger. (2005) Measure phrases as modifiers of adjectives. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 35: 207–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild Roger. (2008) The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 308–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild Roger., Karina Wilkinson. (2002) Quantifiers in comparatives: A semantics of degree based on intervals. Natural Language Semantics 10: 1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuren, Pieter A.M. 1973. The comparative. In Generative grammar in Europe, ed. Ferenc Kiefer and Nicolas Ruwet, 528–564. Dordrecht: Reidel.

  • Seuren, Pieter A.M. 1978. The structure and selection of positive and negative gradable adjectives. In Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, Chicago Linguistics Society, ed. Donka Farkas, W.M. Jacobsen, and K.W. Todrys, 336–346. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  • Snyder, William, Kenneth Wexler, and Dolon Das. 1994. The syntactic representation of degree and quantity: Perspectives from Japanese and child English. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 13, ed. Raul Aranovich et al., 581–596. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

  • Stassen Leon. (1985) Comparison and universal grammar. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenonius, Peter, and Christopher Kennedy. 2006. Northern Norwegian degree questions and the syntax of measurement. In Phases of interpretation, ed. Mara Frascarelli, Studies in Generative Grammar 91, 133–161. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Szabolcsi Anna., Frans Zwarts. (1993) Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. Natural Language Semantics 1: 235–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Shoichi. 2006. More than two quantifiers*. Natural Language Semantics 14:57–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij, Robert. 2008. Comparatives and quantifiers. In Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 7, ed. Olivier Bonami and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr, 423–444. Paris: CSSP.

  • von Fintel, Kai, and Sabine Iatridou. 2007. Anatomy of a modal construction. Linguistic Inquiry 38:445–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, Arnim. 1984a. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3:1–77.

  • von Stechow, Arnim. 1984b. My reply to Cresswell’s, Hellan’s, Hoeksema’s and Seuren’s comments. Journal of Semantics 3:183–199.

  • Williams Edwin. (1977) Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 101–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2008. On the syntactic flexibility of formal features. In The limits of syntactic variation, ed. Theresa Biberauer, 143–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2009. Dislocation effects, uninterpretable features, functional heads, and parametric variation: Consequenes of conflicting interface conditions. In Interphases: Phase-theoretic investigations of linguistic interfaces, ed. Kleanthes Grohmann, 82–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Zeijlstra, Hedde, and Doris Penka. 2005. Negative indefinites in Dutch and German. Ms, Universität Tübingen.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Linguistics Program, Boston University, 621 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Peter Alrenga

  2. Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago, 1010 E 59th St, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

    Christopher Kennedy

Authors
  1. Peter Alrenga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher Kennedy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Alrenga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alrenga, P., Kennedy, C. No more shall we part: Quantifiers in English comparatives. Nat Lang Semantics 22, 1–53 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-013-9099-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-013-9099-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation