Skip to main content
Log in

Regulation of Tentacle Length in Snails by Odor Concentration

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The upper tentacle of the snail, bearing the olfactory organ, produces complex movements when the snail explores a new environment. Tentacle trajectories were reconstructed in the presence and absence of odors using two simultaneous video recordings. Reconstructions showed that in the absence of odor, snails constantly scanned the surrounding space with the extended tentacles. Presentation of an odor elicited rapid flexion, independent of the odor concentration, accompanied by concentration-dependent tentacle contractions. Activation of identified motoneuron MtC3 is known to elicit tentacle contraction. Recordings made in semi-intact preparations showed that the dynamics and duration of the spike activity of MtC3 produced in response to odors correlated with the degree of tentacle contraction in response to odors. These data suggest that the central motoneuron MtC3, which triggers tentacle contraction, is involved in controlling the margins of the scanning field. Slow contraction or extension of the tentacle, associated with the level of MtC3 activity, may operate to tune the snail's investigative behavior to the conditions of the sensory environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. P. M. Balaban and I. S. Zakharov, Learning and Development: A Common Basis for Two Phenomena [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. S. Zakharov, V. N. Mats, and P. M. Balaban, “The role of the giant cerebral neuron in controlling defensive behavior in Helix lucorum,” Neirofiziologiya, 14, No.4, 262–266 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. N. Sokolov, Perception and the Conditioned Reflex [in Russian], Moscow State University Press, Moscow (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Chase and B. Hall, “Nociceptive inputs to C3, a motoneuron of the tentacle withdrawal reflex in Helix aspersa,” J. Comp. Physiol., A179, 809–818 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Chase and B. Tolloczko, “Tracing neural pathways in snail olfaction: from the top of the tentacles to the brain and beyond,” Microscopy Res. Tech., 24, 214–230 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Dale, “Blood pressure and its hydraulic functions in Helix pomacia L.,” J. Exptl. Biol., 59, No.2, 477–490 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. J. Hopfield, “Olfactory computation and object perception,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 6462–6466 (1991).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. J. Hopfield, “Odor space and olfactory processing: Collective algorithms and neural implementation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 12506–12511 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. J. Hopfield and A. Gelperin, “Differential conditioning to a compound stimulus and its components in the terrestrial mollusk Limax maximus,” Behav. Neurosci., 103, 274–293 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Jones, “The nose and paranasal sinuses: physiology and anatomy,” Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 51, 5–19 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. S. Kauer and D. G. Moulton, “Responses of olfactory bulb neurones to odour stimulation of small nasal areas in the salamander,” J. Physiol., 243, 717–737 (1974).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Keyhani, P. W. Scherer, and M. M. Mozell, “A numerical model of nasal odorant transport for the analysis of human olfaction,” J. Theor. Biol., 186, 279–301 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Lemaire and R. Chase, “Twitching and quivering of the tentacles during snail olfactory orientation,” J. Comp. Physiol., 182, 81–87 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Mombaerts, “Seven transmembrane proteins as odorant and chemosensory receptors,” Science, 286, No.5440, 707–711 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. E. S. Nikitin and P. M. Balaban, “Optical recording of odor-evoked responses in the olfactory brain of the naive and aversively-trained terrestrial snails,” Learn. Memory, 75, No.6, 422–432 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. A. Prescott, N. Gill, and R. Chase, “Neuronal circuit mediating tentacle withdrawal in Helix aspersa, with specific reference to the competence of the motor neuron C3,” J. Neurophysiol., 78, 2951–2965 (1997).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. N. J. Vickers, T. A. Christensen, T. C. Baker, and J. G. Hildebrand, “Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code,” Nature, 401, 466–470 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. White, S. Mail, and J. S. Kauer, “Using biology to guide development of an artificial olfactory system,” in: Neurotechnology for Biomimetic Robots, MIT Press, Cambridge (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel'nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 655–665, September–October, 2004.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nikitin, E.S., Zakharov, I.S. & Balaban, P.M. Regulation of Tentacle Length in Snails by Odor Concentration. Neurosci Behav Physiol 36, 63–72 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-005-0163-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-005-0163-5

Key Words

Navigation