Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of life among children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis 1: a systematic review of the literature

  • Topic Review
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this research is to identify, within a systematic review, aspects of quality of life (QoL) that are adversely affected in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis (NF), and to report predictors of quality of life in this population. Published reports of original research were included if they described QoL in children and/or adolescents with NF, and met methodological quality according to a list of predefined criteria. Seven studies conducted between 2006 and 2013 met inclusion criteria. All seven studies examined patients with NF1 and reported that these patients have lower general QoL compared to population norms. Parents’ proxy ratings of QoL were generally lower than children’s self-report ratings. By parent proxy, familial NF1 was a strong protective factor for QoL, while the opposite was found by child report. By parent proxy, male sex was significantly associated with lower scores on the parental time impact of QoL. Skin-related QoL was only slightly altered in this population, vision-specific QoL was impacted only in patients with vision loss. The majority of findings regarding predictors of QoL in children with NF1 were weak, due to a lack of studies, heterogeneity of samples, and heterogeneity of measurements/predictors assessed. Future studies should examine more comprehensively the psychosocial factors affecting the NF population, especially in young patients with NF2 and schwannomatosis, who have been neglected in prior research. The use of consistent QoL measures is preferred to allow better comparison among studies and conditions. Interventions, including comprehensive mind–body treatments, are warranted to address impaired QoL in children and adolescents with NF1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lu-Emerson C, Plotkin SR (2009) The Neurofibromatoses. Part 1: NF1. Rev Neurol Dis 6:E47–E53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lu-Emerson C, Plotkin SR (2009) The neurofibromatoses. Part 2: NF2 and schwannomatosis. Rev Neurol Dis 6:E81–E86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans DG, Howard E, Giblin C, Clancy T, Spencer H, Huson SM, Lalloo F (2010) Birth incidence and prevalence of tumor-prone syndromes: estimates from a UK family genetic register service. Am J Med Genet A 152A:327–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Antinheimo J, Sankila R, Carpen O, Pukkala E, Sainio M, Jaaskelainen J (2000) Population-based analysis of sporadic and type 2 neurofibromatosis-associated meningiomas and schwannomas. Neurology 54:71–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sestini R, Bacci C, Provenzano A, Genuardi M, Papi L (2008) Evidence of a four hit mechanism involving SMARCB1 and NF2 in schanoomatosis associated schwannomas. Hum Mutat 29(2):227–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacoby LB, Jones D, David K, Kronn D, Short PM, Gusella J, MacCollin M (1997) Molecular analyses of the NF-2 tumor supresor gene in schwannomatosis. AJHG 61(7):1293–1302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen R, Dombi E, Widemann BC, Solomon J, Fuensterer C, Kluwe L, Friedman JM, Mautner VF (2012) Growth dynamics of plexiform neurofibromas: a retrospective cohort of 201 patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Orphanet J Rare Dis. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-7-75

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vranceanu AM, Merker VL, Park E, Plotkin SR (2013) Quality of Life among adult patients with neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2, and schwannomatosis: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurooncol 114(3):257–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuijpers T, van der Windt DA, van der Heijden GJ, Bouter LM (2004) Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders. Pain 109:420–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scholten-Peeters GG, Verhagen AP, Bekkering GE, van der Windt DA, Barnsley L, Oostendorp RA, Hendriks EJ (2003) Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Pain 104:303–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ariens GA, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Bouter LM, van der Wal G (2000) Physical risk factors for neck pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 26:7–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garwood MM, Bernacki JM, Fine KM, Hainsworth KR, Davies WH, Klein-Tasman BP. (2006) Physical, cognitive, and psychosocial predictors of functional disability and health-related quality of life in adolescents with neurofibromatosis-1. Pain Research and Treatment 2012:Article ID 975364

  14. Oostenbrink R, Spong K, de Goede-Bolder A, Landgraf JM, Raat H, Moll HA (2007) Parental reports of health-related quality of life in young children with neurofibromatosis type 1: influence of condition specific determinants. J Pediatr 151:182–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Avery RA, Hardy KK (2014) Vision specific quality of life in children with optic pathway gliomas. J Neurooncol 116:341–347

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolkenstein P, Rodriguez D, Ferkal S, Gravier H, Buret V, Algans N, Simeoni MC, Bastuji-Garin S (2008) Impact of neurofibromatosis 1 upon quality of life in childhood: a cross-sectional study of 79 cases. British Journal of Dematology 160:844–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krab LC, Oostenbring R, de Goede-Bolder A, Aarsen FK, Elgersma Y, Moll HA (2009) Health-related quality of life in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: contribution of demographic factors, disease-related factors, and behavior. J Pediatr 154:420–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Graf A, Landolt MA, Capone Mori A, Boltshauser E (2006) Quality of life and psychological adjustment in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr 149:348–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spuijbroek AT, Oostenbring R, Landgraf JM, Rietveld E, de Goede-Bolder A, van Beeck EF, van Baar M, Raat H, Moll HA (2011) Health-related quality of life in preschool children in five health conditions. Qual Life Res 20:779–786

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS (2001) PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory verion 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care 39(8):800–812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Verrips EGH, Vogels TGC, Koopman HM, Theunissen NCM, Kamphuis RP, Fekkes M, Wit JM, Verloove-Vanhorick S (2011) Meauring health-related quality of life in a child population. Eur J Pub Health 9(3):188–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Landgraf JM, Vogel I, Oostenbrink R, van Baar ME, Raat H (2013) Parent-reported health outcomes in infants/toddlers: measurement properties and clinical validity of the ITQOL-SF47. Qual Life Res 22(3):635–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baars RM, Atherton CI, Koopman HM, Bullinger M, Power M (2005) The European DISABKIDS project: development of seven condition-specific modules to measure health related quality of life in children and adolescents. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3:70

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hullman SE, Ryan JL, Ramsey RR, Chaney JM, Mullins LL (2011) Measure of General Pediatric Quality of Life. Arthritis Res Care 63(S11):S420–S430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Birch EE, Cheng CS, Felius J (2007) Validity and reliability of the children’s visual function questionnaire (CVFQ). J AAPOS 11(5):473–479

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis-Jones MS, Finlay AY (1995) The children’s dermatology life quality index (CDLQI): intial validation and practical use. Br J Dermatol 132(6):942–949

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eiser C, Varni JW (2013) Health-related quality of life and symptom reporting: similarities and differences between children and their parents. Eur J Pediatr 172(10):1299–1304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. White-Konig M, Arnaud C, Dickinson HO, Thyen U et al (2007) Determinants of child-parent agreement in quality of life reports: a european study of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 120(4):804–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Youssef NN, Langseder AL, Verga BJ, Mones RL, Rosh JR (2005) Chronic childhood constipation is associated with impaired quality of life: a case controlled study. J Ped Gastroent and Nutrition 41:56–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Denny S, de Silva M, Fleming T, Clark T, Merry S, Ameratunga S, Milfont T, Farrant B, Fortune SA (2014) The prevalence of chronic health conditions impacting on daily functioning and the assocaition with emotional well-being among a national sample of highschool students. J Adol Health 54(4):410–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jamieson N, Fitzgerald D, Singh-Grewal D, Hanson CS, Craig JC, Tong A (2014) Children’s experiences of cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Pediatrics 133(6):1683–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Noll RB, Reiter-Putill J, Moore DB, Schorry EK, Lovell AM, Vannatta K, Gerhardt CA (2007) Social, emotional, and behavioral functioning of children with NF1. Am J Med Genet 143(19):2261–2273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Martin S, Wolters P, Baldwin A, Gillespie A, Dombi E, Walker K, Widemann B (2012) Social-emotinal functioning of children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibromas: relationship with cognitive, disease and environmental variables. J Ped Psychol 37(7):713–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vranceanu AM, Merker V, Plotkin S, Park E (2014) The relaxation response resiliency program (3RP) in patients with neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2 and schwannomatosis. Results from a pilot trial. J Neurooncol 120(22):3554–3561

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wolters PL, Martin S, Merker VL, Gardner KL, Hingtgen CM, Tonsgard JH, Schorry EK, Baldwin A, REiNS International Collaboration (2013) Patient-reported outcomes in neurofibromatosis and schwannomatosis clinical trials. Neurology 81(21 Suppl 1):S6–S14

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana-Maria Vranceanu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vranceanu, AM., Merker, V.L., Park, E.R. et al. Quality of life among children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis 1: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurooncol 122, 219–228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1725-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1725-1

Keywords

Navigation