Skip to main content
Log in

Flood Frequency Modeling and Prediction of Beki and Pagladia Rivers Using Deep Learning Approach

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flood is one of the major reasons of death and despair in the North East Indian state of Assam during the monsoon months each year. The flooding in adjacent areas through which the Beki and Pagladia rivers in Assam flow has been a primary source of damage and destruction during the monsoon season. Traditional and data aided approaches are combined to study and predict the occurrence of flood involving these two rivers. Though traditional approaches have been extensively used, the recent trend is towards the use of learning aided methods. Primarily, a few deep learning approaches like Stacked Auto Encoder (SAE) connected with Tapped Delay Line (TDL) blocks are combined and integrated with layers of TDL-Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) units and bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM) cells to form a configuration which has been extensively trained. This learning involves use of data sets with monthly, weekly, daily and hourly records of significant river flow parameters of Beki and Pagladia to predict these for subsequent periods of time and generate decision states of flooding caused during the rainy season. Data collected from secondary sources and historical records have been combined to train the above mentioned deep learning based approaches to estimate the probability of occurrences of flood. Also a look ahead predictor approach has been configured and used as a part of the system which uses the recorded data to forecast occurrence of flood within certain time intervals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Danso-Amoako E, Scholz M, Kalimeris N, Yang Q, Shao J (2012) Predicting dam failure risk for sustainable flood retention basins: A generic case study for the wider greater manchester area. Comput Environ Urban Syst 36:423–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao M, Hendon HH (2009) Representation and prediction of the indian ocean dipole in the poama seasonal forecast model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 135:337–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Patro S, Chatterjee C, Mohanty S, Singh R, Raghuwanshi N (2009) Flood inundation modeling using mike flood and remote sensing data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Valipour M, Banihabib ME, Behbahani SMR (2012) Parameters estimate of autoregressive moving average and autoregressive integrated moving average models and compare their ability for inflow forecasting. J Math Stat 8:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adamowski JFC et al (2012) Comparison of multiple linear and nonlinear regression, autoregressive integrated moving average, artificial neural network, and wavelet artificial neural network methods for urban water demand forecasting in Montreal, Canada. Water Resources Research 48

  6. Valipour M, Banihabib ME, Behbahani SMR (2013) Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir. J Hydrol 476:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mekanik F, Imteaz M, Gato-Trinidad S, Elmahdi A (2013) Multiple regression and artificial neural network for long-term rainfall forecasting using large scale climate modes. J Hydrol 503:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sivapragasam C, Maheswaran R, Venkatesh V (2008) Genetic programming approach for flood routing in natural channels. Hydrol Process Int J 22:623–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbot J, Marohasy J (2014) Input selection and optimization for monthly rainfall forecasting in Queensland, Australia, using artificial neural networks. Atmos Res 138:166–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox NI, Wikle CK (2005) A bayesian quantitative precipitation nowcast scheme. Weather Forecast 20:264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Merz B, Hall J, Disse M, Schumann A (2010) Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:509–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aichouri I, Hani A, Bougherira N, Djabri L, Chaffai H, Lallahem S (1995) River flow model using artificial neural networks. Energy Procedia 74:1007–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghose DK (2018) Measuring discharge using back-propagation neural network: a case study on Brahmani river basin. Intelligent Engineering Informatics. Springer, Singapore, pp 591–598

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee GH, Jung SH, Lee DE (2018) Comparison of physics-based and data-driven models for streamflow simulation of the Mekong river. J Korea Water Resour Assoc 51(6):503–514

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zeng M, Cao H, Chen M, Li Y (2019) User behaviour modeling, recommendations, and purchase prediction during shopping festivals. Electronic Markets 29:263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alipour A, Ahmadalipour A, Abbaszadeh P, Moradkhani H (2020) Leveraging machine learning for predicting flash flood damage in the Southeast US. Environ Res Lett 15:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. (2020) ASCE Task Committee 2000a ASCE task committee artificial neural networks in hydrology: I Preliminary concepts. J Hydrol Eng, ASCE 5:115–123

  18. Tegegne G, Melesse AM, Asfaw DH, Worqlul AW (2020) Flood frequency analyses over different basin scales in the Blue Nile River basin, Ethiopia. Hydrology 7(3):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Esmaeel D, Choubin B, Eigdir AN, Nabipour N, Panahi M, Shamshirband S, Mosavi A (2020) Integrated machine learning methods with resampling algorithms for flood susceptibility prediction. Sci Total Envion 705:1–52

    Google Scholar 

  20. Anaraki MV, Farzin S, Mousavi S-F, Karami H (2021) Uncertainty analysis of climate change impacts on flood frequency by using hybrid machine learning methods. Water Resour Manag 35(1):199–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ke Q, Tian X, Bricker J, Tian Z, Guan G, Cai H, Huang X, Yang H, Liu J (2020) Urban pluvial flooding prediction by machine learning approaches-a case study of Shenzhen city, China. Adv Water Resour 145:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Addor N, Newman AJ, Mizukami N, Clark MP (2017) The CAMELS data set: catchment attributes and meteorology for largesample studies. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:5293–5313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Addor N, Newman AJ, Mizukami N, Clark MP (2017) Catchment attributes for large-sample studies. Boulder, CO:UCAR/NCAR

  24. Sarker IH (2021) Machine learning: algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Comput Sci 2(160):1–21

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2015) Deep learning. MIT Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Devi, G., Sharma, M., Sarma, P. et al. Flood Frequency Modeling and Prediction of Beki and Pagladia Rivers Using Deep Learning Approach. Neural Process Lett 54, 3263–3282 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10773-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10773-1

Keywords

Navigation