Abstract
Questions about the relationship between linguistic competence and expertise will be examined in the paper. Harry Collins and others distinguish between ubiquitous and esoteric expertise. Collins places considerable weight on the argument that ordinary linguistic competence and related phenomena exhibit a high degree of expertise. His position and ones which share close affinities are methodologically problematic. These difficulties matter because there is continued and systematic disagreement over appropriate methodologies for the empirical study of expertise. Against Collins, it will be argued that the term ‘expertise’ should be reserved for expertise (esoteric experts) and exclude everyday performance (ubiquitous experts). Wittgensteinian ideas will be employed to maintain that it is mistaken and misleading to derive substantive conclusions about the epistemology of expertise from ordinary linguistic competence and vice versa. Significant attention will be devoted to the notion of following a rule with particular reference to the intelligibility of tacit rule following. A satisfactory theoretical approach to expertise should not involve making important claims about ordinary linguistic competence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addis, M. (2001). D.Z. Phillips’ fideism in Wittgenstein’s mirror. In R. Arrington & M. Addis (Eds.), Wittgenstein and philosophy of religion (pp. 85–100). London: Routledge.
Baker, G., & Hacker, P. (1994). Rules, grammar and necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bix, B. (1995). Law, language and legal determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon.
Bloor, D. (2002). Wittgenstein, rules and institutions. London: Routledge.
Carr, D. (1981). Knowledge in practice. American Philosophical Quarterly, 18, 53–61.
Cianciolo, A., Matthew, C., Sternberg, R., & Wagner, R. (2006). Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, and expertise. In K. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 613–632). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, H. (2001a). Tacit knowledge, trust and the Q of sapphire. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 71–85.
Collins, H. (2001b). What is tacit knowledge? In T. Schatzki, K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 107–119). London: Routledge.
Collins, H. (2007). Bicycling on the moon: collective tacit knowledge and somatic-limit tacit knowledge. Organization Studies, 28(2), 257–262.
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Collins, H. (2011). Three dimensions of expertise. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (in press)
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Collins, H., & Kusch, M. (1998). The shape of actions: what humans and machines can do. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dennett, D. (1984). Cognitive wheels: the frame problem of AI. In C. Hookway (Ed.), Minds, machines and evolution: philosophical studies (pp. 129–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, S. (2000). Democracy, expertise, and AIDS treatment activism. In D. Kleinman (Ed.), Science, technology and democracy (pp. 15–32). New York: SUNY Press.
Hacker, P. (1993). Wittgenstein: meaning and mind, part I—essays. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kane, A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 56–71.
Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–424.
Winch, P. (1990). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L. (1972). The blue and brown books. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1984). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Addis, M. Linguistic competence and expertise. Phenom Cogn Sci 12, 327–336 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9211-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9211-5