Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Diagnosis and Resolution to the Generality Problem

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to offer a diagnosis and a resolution to generality problem. I state the generality problem and suggest a distinction between criteria of relevance and what I call a theory of determination. The generality problem may concern either of these. While plausible criteria of relevance would be convenient for the externalist, he does not need them. I discuss various theories of determination, and argue that no existing theory of determination is plausible. This provides a case for the no determination view: there are no facts that determine relevant types. This is the diagnosis of the generality problem. The externalist, however, may embrace the no determination view. This is what provides a resolution to the generality problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston, William (1995): ‘How to Think About Reliability’, Philosophical Topics, Spring 1–29.

  • BonJour, Laurence (1985): The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Harvard University Press.

  • Audre Jean Brokes (2001) ArticleTitle‘What does the Generality Problem Show?’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82 145–156 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0114.00122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Conee R. Feldman (1998) ArticleTitle‘The Generality Problem for Reliabilism’ Philosophical Studies 89 1–29 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004243308503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRose, Keith (1999): ‘Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense’, in John Greco and Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Blackwell 187–205.

  • Richard Feldman (1993) ArticleTitle‘Proper Functionalism’ Nous 27 1 34–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard Feldman (1985) ArticleTitle‘Reliability and Justification’ The Monist 68 159–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, Mark (1995): ‘The Simple Solution to the Problem of Generality’, Nous 29, 501–515.

  • Robert Nozick (1981) Philosophical Explorations Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvin Plantinga (1993a) Warrant and Proper Function Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvin Plantinga (1993b) ArticleTitle‘Why We Need Proper Function’ Nous 27 1 66–82

    Google Scholar 

  • John Pollock (1984) ArticleTitle‘Reliability and Justified Belief’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Frederick (1992): Knowledge and Belief, Routledge.

  • Sosa, Ernest (1991): Knowledge in Perspective. Selected Essays in Epistemology, Cambridge University Press.

  • Charles Wallis (1994) ArticleTitle‘Truth-Ratios, Process, Task, and Knowledge’ Synthese 98 243–269 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01063943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crispin Wright (1992) Truth and Objectivity Harvard University Press Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, Philosophy and Rhetoric, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 80, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Klemens Kappel

Authors
  1. Klemens Kappel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klemens Kappel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kappel, K. A Diagnosis and Resolution to the Generality Problem. Philos Stud 127, 525–560 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7805-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7805-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation