Abstract
Background and aims
In upland ecosystems, climate and initial litter quality are the two major factors influencing decomposition rates regionally and globally. Litters are exposed to a different decomposition environment in wetlands than in upland ecosystems, but the driving factors of litter decomposition in wetlands at a large scale are still unclear.
Methods
We established a comprehensive database of litter decomposition in China, including 249 datasets and 27 pairs of sites, to examine the controlling factors of decomposition in both wetland and upland ecosystems at the regional scale.
Results
Both ecosystems showed similar climatic conditions, but the average litter decomposition potential was higher in wetlands than in upland ecosystems, as indicated by a higher initial K content and lower initial carbon content. The average decomposition rate in wetlands was almost 3 times higher than that in upland ecosystems. In both ecosystems, the decomposition rate increased with the mean annual temperature, mean annual precipitation, and initial N content. However, linear regressions of these variables with the decomposition rate indicated steeper slopes in wetlands than in upland ecosystems.
Conclusions
The litter decomposition rate responded to climate and initial N content in both ecosystem types, but these responses were more rapid in wetlands than upland ecosystems. Wetland ecosystems should be given more attention when studying the responses of litter dynamics to future climate changes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adair EC, Parton WJ, Del Grosso SJ, Silver WL, Harmon ME, Hall SA, Burke IC, Hart SC (2008) Simple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates. Glob Chang Biol 14:2636–2660
Aerts R (2006) The freezer defrosting: global warming and litter decomposition rates in cold biomes. J Ecol 94:713–724
Alvarez-Clare S, Mack M (2011) Influence of precipitation on soil and foliar nutrients across nine Costa Rican forests. Biotropica 43:433–441
Ayres E, Steltzer H, Simmons BL, Simpson RT, Steinweg JM, Wallenstein MD, Mellor N, Parton WJ, Moore JC, Wall DH (2009) Home-field advantage accelerates leaf litter decomposition in forests. Soil Biol Biochem 41:606–610
Berg B, Berg MP, Bottner P, Box E, Breymeyer A, Calvo de Anta R, Couteaux M, Escudero A, Gallardo A, Kratz W (1993) Litter mass loss rates in pine forests of Europe and eastern United States: some relationships with climate and litter quality. Biogeochemistry 20:127–159
Beth MC, Erika BK, Jackson RW (2012) Immobilization and mineralization of N and P by heterotrophic microbes during leaf decomposition. Freshw Sci 31:133–147
Bontti EE, Decant JP, Munson SM, Gathany MA, Przeszlowska A, Haddix ML, Owens S, Burke IC, Parton WJ, Harmon ME (2009) Litter decomposition in grasslands of Central North America (US Great Plains). Glob Chang Biol 15:1356–1363
Bosatta E, Ågren GI (1999) Soil organic matter quality interpreted thermodynamically. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1889–1891
Bradford MA, Berg B, Maynard DS, Wieder WR, Wood SA (2016) Understanding the dominant controls on litter decomposition. J Ecol 104:229–238
Bray SR, Kitajima K, Mack MC (2012) Temporal dynamics of microbial communities on decomposing leaf litter of 10 plant species in relation to decomposition rate. Soil Biol Biochem 49:30–37
Cheng XL, Luo YQ, Su B, Zhou XH, Niu SL, Sherry R, Weng ES, Zhang QF (2010) Experimental warming and clipping altered litter carbon and nitrogen dynamics in a tall grass prairie. Agric Ecosyst Environ 138:206–213
Cusack DF, Chou WW, Yang WH, Harmon ME, Silver WL, The LIDET team (2009) Controls on long-term root and leaf litter decomposition in neotropical forests. Glob Chang Biol 15:1339–1355
Datry T, Corti R, Claret C, Philippe M (2011) Flow intermittence controls leaf litter breakdown in a French temporary alluvial river: the “drying memory”. Aquat Sci 73:471–483
Davidson NC, Max FC (2018) Extent, regional distribution and changes in area of different classes of wetland. Mar Freshw Res 69:1525–1533
De Santo AV, Berg B, Rutigliano FA, Alfani A, Floretto A (1993) Factors regulating early-stage decomposition of needle litters in five different coniferous forests. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1423–1433
Duan H, Wang L, Zhang YN, Fu XH, Tsang YF, Wu JH, Le YQ (2018) Variable decomposition of two plant litters and their effects on the carbon sequestration ability of wetland soil in the Yangtze River estuary. Geoderma 319:230–238
Fierer N, Craine JM, McLauchlan K, Schimel JP (2005) Litter quality and the temperature sensitivity of decomposition. Ecology 86:320–326
Fonseca AL, Bianchini I, Pimenta CM, Soares CB, Mangiavacchi N (2013) The flow velocity as driving force for decomposition of leaves and twigs. Hydrobiologia 703:59–67
Freschet GT, Weedon JT, Aerts R, van Hal JR, Cornelissen JHC (2012) Interspecific differences in wood decay rates: insights from a new short-term method to study long-term wood decomposition. J Ecol 100:161–170
Gholz HL, Wedin DA, Smitherman SM, Harmon ME, Parton WJ (2010) Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition. Glob Chang Biol 6:751–765
Hu WF, Zhang WL, Zhang LH, Chen XY, Lin W, Zeng CS, Tong C (2014) Stoichiometric characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus in major wetland vegetation of China. Chin J Plant Ecol 38:1041–1052
Kang HZ, Xin ZJ, Berg B, Burgess PJ, Liu QL, Liu ZC, Li ZH, Liu CJ (2010) Global pattern of leaf litter nitrogen and phosphorus in woody plants. Ann Forest Sci 67:811–811
Kurz-Besson C, Coûteaux MM, Thiéry JM, Berg B, Remacle J (2005) A comparison of litterbag and direct observation methods of scots pine needle decomposition measurement. Soil Biol Biochem 37:2315–2318
Larmola T, Alm J, Juutinen S, Koppisch D, Augustin J, Martikainen PJ, Silvola J (2006) Spatial patterns of litter decomposition in the littoral zone of boreal lakes. Freshw Biol 51:2252–2264
Liski J, Nissinen A, Erhard M, Taskinen O (2003) Climatic effects on litter decomposition from arctic tundra to tropical rainforest. Glob Chang Biol 9:575–584
Manzoni S, Trofymow JA, Jackson RB, Porporato A (2010) Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter. Ecol Monogr 80:89–106
Meentemeyer V (1978) Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology 59:465–472
Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–331
Osono T, Ono Y, Takeda H (2003) Fungal ingrowth on forest floor and decomposing needle litter of Chamaecyparis obtusa in relation to resource availability and moisture condition. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1423–1431
Prescott CE (2010) Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry 101:133–149
Rejmánková E, Sirová D (2006) Wetland plant decomposition under different nutrient conditions: what is more important, litter quality or site quality? Biogeochemistry 80:245–262
Shiels AB (2006) Leaf litter decomposition and substrate chemistry of early successional species on landslides in Puerto Rico. Biotropica 38:348–353
Silver WL, Miya RK (2001) Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129:407–419
Straková P, Niemi RM, Freeman C, Peltoniemi K, Toberman H, Heiskanen I, Fritze H, Laiho R (2011) Litter type affects the activity of aerobic decomposers in a boreal peatland more than site nutrient and water table regimes. Biogeosciences 8:2741–2755
Torremorell A, Gantes P (2010) Decomposition and nitrogen dynamics of Rhynchospora asperula in floating soils of Esteros del Iberá, Argentina. Wetl Ecol Manag 18:191–201
Trinder CJ, Johnson D, Artz RR (2008) Interactions among fungal community structure, litter decomposition and depth of water table in a cutover peatland. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64:433–448
Vitousek PM (2004) Nutrient cycling and limitation: Hawai’I as a model system. In: Princeton University press. Princeton, New Jersey
Wallis E, Raulings E (2011) Relationship between water regime and hummock-building by Melaleuca ericifolia and Phragmites australis in a brackish wetland. Aquat Bot 95:182–188
Waring BG (2012) A meta-analysis of climatic and chemical controls on leaf litter decay rates in tropical forests. Ecosystems 15:999–1009
Xie YJ, Xie YH, Chen XS, Li F, Hou ZY, Li X (2016a) Non-additive effects of water availability and litter quality on decomposition of litter mixtures. J Freshw Ecol 31:153–168
Xie YJ, Xie YH, Hu C, Chen XS, Li F (2016b) Interaction between litter quality and simulated water depths on decomposition of two emergent macrophytes. J Limnol 75:36–43
Yahdjian L, Sala OE (2008) Do litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization show the same trend in the response to dry and wet years in the Patagonian steppe? J Arid Environ 72:687–695
Zhang XY, Wang W (2015) Control of climate and litter quality on leaf litter decomposition in different climatic zones. J Plant Res 128:791–802
Zhang DQ, Hui DF, Luo YQ, Zhou GY (2008) Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J Plant Ecol 1:85–93
Zhou GY, Guan LL, Wei XH, Tang XL, Liu SG, Liu JX, Zhang DQ, Yan JH (2008) Factors influencing leaf litter decomposition: an intersite decomposition experiment across China. Plant Soil 311:61–72
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by the National Key Technology R & D Program (2014BAC09B03), Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of East China University of Technology (DHBK2016108), and Scientific Research Foundation of East China University of Technology for Science and Technology Innovation Team (DHKT2015101).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Alfonso Escudero.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(XLS 118 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, Y., Xie, Y. & Xiao, H. Differential responses of litter decomposition to climate between wetland and upland ecosystems in China. Plant Soil 440, 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04022-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04022-z