Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudes of bus operators towards real-time transit information tools

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although it is apparent that providing useful information has a positive effect on transit riders, no studies to date have investigated bus operators’ reactions to real-time arrival information and other potential rider information tools. In this study, the project team surveyed 253 bus operators to determine their views and values concerning the existing use of real-time information and to ask about future transit rider information applications. Almost all operators (93 and 91 % on two separate questions) were positive or neutral to the provision of real-time information. In addition, operators were receptive to building other new information applications, with all applications in the survey being supported by at least 60 % of the bus operators. The two most widely supported potential applications in the survey were additional tools to help blind and deaf-blind riders (89 % of bus operators favored) and an application that would aid riders in identifying physical stop, shelter and bus issues such as graffiti, broken parts or a need for lights (88 % of bus operators). Applications displaying data about past performance or current bus capacity received the least support (66 and 61 % respectively). This research gives a better understanding of the impact of rider information tools on bus operators, including the views and values of the operators, and the harms and benefits of such tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azenkot, S., Prasain, S., Borning, A., Fortuna, E., Ladner, R.E., Wobbrock, J.O.: Enhancing independence and safety for blind and deaf-blind public transit riders. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Vancouver (2011)

  • Blower, D., Green, P.E., Matteson, A.: Bus operator types and driver factors in fatal bus crashes: results from the buses involved in fatal accidents survey. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor (2008)

  • Chen, W.-H., Lin, T.-W., Kao, K.-C., Hwang, S.-L.: Safety assessment of different in-vehicle interface designs for bus collision warning systems. Transp. Res. Rec. 2072, 57–63 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunradi, C., Greiner, B., Ragland, D., Fisher, J.: Alcohol, stress-related factors, and short-term absenteeism among urban transit operators. J. Urban Health 82(1), 43–57 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D., Smyth, J., Melani Christian, L.: Internet, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziekan, K., Kottenhoff, K.: Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport: effects on customers. Transp. Res. A 41(6), 489–501 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, B., Watkins, K., Borning, A.: OneBusAway: results from providing real-time arrival information for public transit. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) 2010, New York (2010)

  • Friedman, B., Kahn, P., Borning, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Zhang, P., Galletta, D. (ed.) Human–Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations pp. 348–372. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk (2006)

  • Holm, S.: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, P.: The Human Relationship with Nature: Development and Culture. In: Structural-developmental methods, chapt. 5, pp. 77–93. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

  • Krueger, G., Brewster, R., Dick, V., Inderbitzen, R., Staplin, L.: Health and Wellness Programs for Commercial Drivers. Commerical Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program, 15 (2007)

  • Lee, Y.-J., Chon, K., Hill, D., Desai, N.: Effect of automatic vehicle location on schedule adherence for mass transit administration bus system. Transp. Res. Rec. 1760 (2001)

  • Miller, J., Friedman, B., Jancke, G., Gill, B.: Value tensions in design: the value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation’s groupware software. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) 2007, San Jose (2007)

  • Multisystems: Strategies for improved traveler information. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 92, Transportation Research Board (2003)

  • Palacio, A., Tamburro, G., O’Neill, D., Simms, C.: Non-collision injuries in urban buses—strategies for prevention. Accid. Anal. Prev. 41, 1–9 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragland, D., Krause, N., Greiner, B., Fisher, J.: Studies of health outcomes in transit operators: policy implications of the current scientific database. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 3(2), 172–187 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, J.R., Hinebaugh, D., Fernandez, J.: Analysis of Florida transit bus crashes. Transp. Res. Rec. 1791, 26–34 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydstedt, F., Johansson, G., Evans, G.: The human side of the road: improving the work conditions of urban bus driver. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 3(2), 161–171 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., Thakuriah, P.: Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: a case study in the City of Chicago. Transp. Res. C 22, 146–161 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, J.L.M., Flin, R., Mearns, K.: Bus driver well-being review: 50 years of research. Transp. Res. F 9, 89–114 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg, A.Ea.: The relation of non-culpable traffic incidents to bus drivers’ celebration behavior. J. Saf. Res. 39, 41–46 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg, A.Ea., Dorn, L.: Absence behavior as traffic crash predictor in bus drivers. J. Saf. Res. 40, 197–201 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K., Ferris, B., Borning, A., Rutherford, G.S., Layton, D.: Where is my bus? Impact of mobile real-time information on the perceived and actual wait time of transit riders. Transp. Res. A 45, 839–848 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K., Ferris, B., Malinovskiy, Y., Borning, A.: Beyond context sensitive solutions: using value sensitive design to identify needed transit information tools. In: 3rd International Conference on Urban Transportation Systems, Paris (2012)

Download references

Acknowledgments

We offer our sincere thanks to all the KC Metro operators who took part in the survey and the ATU for their generous help with implementation. We also thank Batya Friedman and Jill Woelfer for their assistance in reviewing the survey instrument. Finally, we would like to thank the reviewers whose comments allowed us to substantially improve this paper. This work has been funded in part by National Science Foundation grants IIS-0705898 and CNS-0905384.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kari Edison Watkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watkins, K.E., Borning, A., Rutherford, G.S. et al. Attitudes of bus operators towards real-time transit information tools. Transportation 40, 961–980 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9450-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9450-0

Keywords

Navigation