Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Family, community, and educational outcomes in South Asia

  • TRENDS/CASES
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we review research on the economics and sociology of education to assess the relationships between family and community variables and children’s educational outcomes in South Asia. At the family level, we examine the variables of family socioeconomic status (SES), parental education, family structure, and religion and caste. At the community level, we assess the limited research on the relationships between economic, cultural, and social characteristics and children’s educational outcomes. The literature presents several consistent relationships between the roles of family and community characteristics in determining educational outcomes and reveals several possibilities for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. More frequent data collection initiatives, better access to computing power, and a growing emphasis on evidence-based policymaking are some of the reasons for these recent developments. Fuller (1986) is an example of another comprehensive but dated review of the literature on the determinants of schooling outcomes in Asia and other developing regions.

  2. Most recently attempts have been made to collect internationally comparable learning data in India, but such information is still not available on a national scale (Das and Zajonc 2008). Leading researchers are now making important strides in this area of work, however. For instance, most recently the journal Education Economics devoted an entire issue to quality education in South Asia (Kingdon and Riboud 2009). This literature on learning outcomes is still under development in the South Asian context but it is much more developed in areas outside this region (for a broader literature review see Chudgar and Luschei 2009).

  3. Furthermore, though it is known that family- and community-level characteristics are intertwined and affect each other, researchers find it hard to separate family from community influences, and vice versa. It is also worth noting that educational outcomes can affect family and community characteristics. For example, high-performing children can encourage their parents to get more education or to initiate community-improvement programs. However, no research on these topics has been conducted in South Asia.

  4. According to data compiled by economists Barro and Lee (2001), between 1960 and 2000 the average years of education of adult men and women in South Asia increased significantly, with the exception of Afghanistan. Improvements in average educational attainment in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal are particularly modest: average attainment increased from about 1 year in 1960 to less than 3 years in 2000. The increases in India and Pakistan are better: from 2 years of education in 1960 to 4 years of education in 2000. In any given year, Sri Lanka’s average educational attainment has been far larger than in other South Asian countries: from 4 years in 1960 to 7 years in 2000. Regarding the gender gaps in the average educational attainment of adults, larger pro-male gaps persist in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan—greater than 1 year of education. In Burma and Sri Lanka, the pro-male gender gaps are smaller—less than 1 year. In Nepal in the early 1960s and 1970s there was no gender gap because the educational attainments of both men and women were nearly zero; over time, Nepal’s pro-male gender gaps became similar to those in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan.

  5. In a different context, using data for 22 countries from the Demographic and Health Survey, Desai and Alva (1998) showed that the relationship between a mother’s education and her children’s health outcomes was uniformly reduced once the researchers accounted for the father’s education, various socio-economic status indicators, and location. Thus they call into question the causal link between maternal education and children’s well-being.

References

  • Ahmed, M., Ahmed, K. S., Khan, N. I., & Ahmed, R. (2007). Access to education in Bangladesh: Country analytic review of primary and secondary school. http://www.create-rpc.org/pdf_documents/Bangladesh_CAR.pdf.

  • Alderman, H., Behrman, J., Ross, D., & Sabot, R. (1996). Decomposing the gender gap in cognitive skills in a poor rural economy. Journal of Human Resources, 31(1), 229–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrabi, T., Das, J., & Khwaja, A. (2008). A dime a day: The possibilities and limits of private schooling in Pakistan. Comparative Education Review, 52(3), 329–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrabi, T., Das, J., Khwaja, A., & Zajonc, T. (2006). Religious school enrolment in Pakistan: A look at the data. Comparative Education Review, 50(3), 446–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arends-Kuenning, M., & Amin, S. (2004). School incentive programs and children’s activities: The case of Bangladesh. Comparative Education Review, 48, 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunatilake, N. (2006). Education participation in Sri Lanka—Why all are not in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asadullah, M. N. (2006). Returns to education in Bangladesh. Education Economics, 14(4), 453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asadullah, M. N., & Chaudhury, N. (2009). Reverse gender gap in schooling in Bangladesh: Insights from urban and rural households. Journal of Development Studies, 46(8), 1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslam, M. (2009a). Education gender gaps in Pakistan: Is the labour market to blame? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57(4), 747–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam, M. (2009b). The relative effectiveness of government and private schools in Pakistan: Are girls worse off? Education Economics, 17(3), 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aturupane, H. (1997). Earnings functions and rates of return to education in Sri Lanka (UC-ISS Project Working Paper Series No. 9701). Colombo: University of Colombo.

  • Aturupane, H., Glewwe, P., & Wisniewski, S. (2007). The impact of school quality, socio-economic factors and child health on students’ academic performance: Evidence from Sri Lankan primary schools. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., & Lee, J.-W. (2001). International data on educational attainment: Updates and implications. Oxford Economic Papers, 53(3), 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family: Enlarged edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. (1999). Schooling in Asia: Selected micro evidence on determinants and effects and policy implications. Journal of Asian Economics, 10, 147–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J., Foster, A., Rosenzweig, M., & Vasishthan, P. (1999). Women’s schooling, home teaching, and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 17, 682–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennell, P. (1996). Rates of return to education: Does the conventional pattern prevail in sub-Saharan Africa? World Development, 24(1), 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoliel, S., Ilon, L., Sutton, M., Karmacharya, D., Lamichhane, S., Rajbhandry, P., et al. (1995). Promoting education for girls in Nepal (CDIE Impact Evaluation No. 5). Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhalotra, S., & Heady, C. (2003). Child farm labor: The wealth paradox. World Bank Economic Review, 17, 197–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borooah, V., & Iyer, S. (2005). Vidya, Veda, and Varna: The influence of religion and caste on education in rural India. Journal of Development Studies, 41(8), 1369–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, C., & Hannum, E. (2001). Education and stratification in developing countries: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAMPE [Campaign for Popular Literacy] (1999). Hope not complacency: State of primary education in Bangladesh. Dhaka: The University Press Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamarbagwala, R. (2008). Regional returns to education, child labor, and schooling in India. Journal of Development Studies, 44(2), 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhury, N., Hammer, J., Kremer, M., Muralidharan, K., & Rogers, H. (2006). Missing in action: Teacher and health worker absence in developing countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudgar, A. (2006). Factors associated with decisions to educate sons and daughters in India. Unpublished paper, Stanford University.

  • Chudgar, A. (2008). Looking beyond the household: The importance of community-level factors in understanding underrepresentation of girls in Indian education. In M. A. Maslak (Ed.), The structure and agency of women’s education (pp. 201–218). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudgar, A. (2009). Does adult literacy have a role to play in addressing the Universal Elementary Education challenge in India? Comparative Education Review, 53(3), 403–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudgar, A., & Luschei, T. (2009). National income, income inequality, and the importance of schools: A hierarchical cross-national comparison. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 626–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockcroft, A., Andersson, N., Milne, D., Omer, K., Ansari, N., Khan, A., et al. (2009). Challenging the myths about madaris in Pakistan: A national household survey of enrolment and reasons for choosing religious schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(4), 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar, A., Blunch, N.-H., Kim, B., & Sasaki, M. (2002). Participation of children in schooling and labor activities: A review of empirical studies (Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0221). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, J. & Zajonc, T. (2008). India shining and Bharat drowning: Comparing two Indian states to the worldwide distribution in mathematics achievement (Policy Research Working Paper No. 4644). Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Desai, S., & Alva, S. (1998). Maternal education and child health: Is there a causal relationship? Demography, 35(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal, D. P., Grabowski, R., & Belbase, K. (1987). The effect of education in Nepal’s traditional agriculture. Economics of Education Review, 6(1), 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dréze, J., & Kingdon, G. (2003). School participation in India. Review of Development Economics, 5, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duraisamy, P. (2002). Changes in returns to education in India, 1983–94: By gender, age-cohort and location. Economics of Education Review, 21(6), 609–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duraisamy, P., & Malathy, R. (1991). Impact of public programs on fertility and gender specific investment in human capital of children in rural India: Cross-sectional and time series analyses. Research in Population Economics, 7, 157–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlund, L. & Rahman, A. (2005). Household structure and child outcomes: Nuclear vs. extended families—Evidence from Bangladesh. Working Paper, Columbia University.

  • Edmonds, E. (2003). Child labor in South Asia. OECD Social, Employment, and Migration Working Paper (No. 5). Paris: OECD.

  • Edmonds, E. (2008). Child labor. In T. P. Schultz & J. Strauss (Eds.), Handbook of development economics, Vol 4 (pp. 3607–3709). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J., & Sanders, M. (2000). Connecting home, school, and community: New directions in social research. In M. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 285–306). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps, M., & Quisumbing, A. (1999). Social roles, human capital, and the intrahousehold division of labor: Evidence from Pakistan (FCND Discussion Paper 73). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). Educational enrollment and attainment in India: Household wealth, gender, village, and state effects. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 13(2), 135–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B. (1986). Is primary school quality eroding in the third world? Comparative Education Review, 30(4), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glewwe, P., & Kremer, M. (2006). Schools, teachers, and education outcomes in developing countries. In E. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2, pp. 945–1018). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Govinda, R., & Bandopadhyay, M. (2008). Access to elementary education in India: Country analytical review. http://www.create-rpc.org/pdf_documents/India_CAR.pdf.

  • Goyal, S. (2009). Inside the house of learning: The relative performance of public and private schools in Orissa. Education Economics, 17(3), 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannum, E., & Buchmann, C. (2004). Global educational expansion and socio-economic development: An assessment of findings from the social sciences. World Development, 33(3), 333–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. (2009). School policy: Implications of recent research for human capital investments in South Asia and other developing countries. Education Economics, 17(3), 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika, G. (2001). The sensitivity of primary school enrolment to the costs of post-primary schooling in rural Pakistan: A gender perspective. Education Economics, 10(2), 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyneman, S., & Loxley, W. (1983). The effect of primary-school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high- and low-income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1162–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (2003). Measuring the determinants of school completion in Pakistan: Analysis of censoring and selection bias. Economics of Education Review, 22, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, D., & Lockheed, M. (1987). Participation in schooling: Determinants and learning outcomes in Nepal. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 35(2), 279–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, D., & Moock, P. (1984). Farmer education and farm efficiency in Nepal: The role of schooling, extension services, and cognitive skills. World Development, 12(1), 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeejeebhoy, S. (1993). Family size: Outcomes for children and gender disparities. Economic and Political Weekly, 28, 1811–1821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambhampati, U., & Rajan, R. (2006). Economic growth: A panacea for child labor? World Development, 34(3), 426–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G. (2005). Where has all the bias gone? Detecting gender bias in the household allocation of educational expenditure. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53(2), 409–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G., & Riboud, M. (2009). Introduction. Education Economics, 17(3), 287–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G., & Unni, J. (2001). Education and women’s labour market outcomes in India. Education Economics, 9(2), 173–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochar, A. (2004). Urban influences on rural schooling in India. Journal of Development Economics, 74, 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koolwal, G. (2007). Son preference and child labor in Nepal: The household impact of sending girls to work. World Development, 35(5), 881–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M., Chaudhury, N., Hammer, J., Muralidharan, K., & Rogers, H. (2005). Teacher absence in India: A snapshot. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2–3), 658–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C., Mete, C., & Grant, M. (2009). The implications of changing educational and family circumstances for children’s grade progression in rural Pakistan: 1997–2004. Economics of Education Review, 28, 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M., Jamison, D., & Lau, L. (1980). Farmer education and farmer efficiency: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 29(1), 37–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loury, G. (1981). Intergenerational transfers and the distribution of earnings. Econometrica, 49(4), 843–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitra, P. (2003). Schooling and educational attainment: Evidence from Bangladesh. Education Economics, 11, 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAslan, E. (2002). Social capital and development. In V. Desai & R. Potter (Eds.), The companion to development studies (pp. 139–144). London: Hodder Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthi, M., Guio, A.-C., & Dréze, J. (1995). Mortality, fertility, and gender bias in India: A district-level analysis. Population and Development Review, 17(3), 415–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, S. (2002). The transition from non-formal to formal education: The case of BRAC, Bangladesh. International Review of Education, 48, 517–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nechyba, T., Older-Aguilar, D., & McEwan, P. (1999). The effect of family and community resources on education outcomes. Duke University: Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prennushi, G. (1999). Nepal: Poverty at the turn of the twenty-first century: Main report and background studies (South Asia Region Internal Discussion Paper IDP 174). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • PROBE Team [Public Report on Basic Education] (1999). The PROBE report: Public Report on Basic Education in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. (2004). Returns to investment in education: A further update. Education Economics, 12(2), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranasinghe, A., & Hartog, J. (2002). Free education in Sri Lanka. Does it eliminate the family effect? Economics of Education Review, 21, 623–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V., & Walton, M. (Eds.). (2004). Culture and public action: A cross-disciplinary dialogue on development policy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., & Wodon, Q. (1999). Does child labor displace schooling? Responses to an enrolment subsidy. Economic Journal, 110(462), C158–C175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, E. (2004). Education and hypergamy in the marriage market. Working paper. University of Washington.

  • Rosenzweig, M. R., & Evenson, R. (1977). Fertility, schooling, and the economic contribution of children in rural India: An econometric analysis. Econometrica, 45(5), 1965–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. R., & Schultz, P. (1982). Market opportunities, genetic endowments, and intrafamily resource distribution: Child survival in rural India. American Economic Review, 72(4), 803–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachar, R. (2006). Social, economic and educational status of the Muslim community of India: A report. New Delhi: Prime Minister’s High Level Committee, Cabinet Secretariat, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. (2002). Performance of the Bangladeshi labor market during the nineties. Background paper prepared for the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank.

  • Sankar, D. (2007). What is the progress in elementary education participation in India during the last two decades? An analysis using NSS education rounds, South Asia sector for human development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Schultz, T. (1975). The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria. Journal of Economic Literature, 13(3), 827–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. P. (2001). Why governments should invest more to educate girls. World Development, 30(2), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2004). How does culture matter? In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action: A cross-disciplinary dialogue on development policy (pp. 37–58). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafiq, M. N. (2007a). Household schooling and child labor decisions in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Asian Economics, 18(6), 946–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafiq, M. N. (2007b). Household rates of return to education in rural Bangladesh: Accounting for direct costs, child labour, and option value. Education Economics, 15(3), 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafiq, M. N. (2009). A reversal of educational fortune? Educational gender gaps in Bangladesh. Journal of International Development, 21(1), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A. (1999). India: Human development report: A profile of Indian states in the 1990s. New Delhi: NCAER and Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, G. M., Lamichhane, S. R., Thapa, B. K., Chitrakar, R., Useem, M., & Comings, J. P. (1986). Determinants of educational participation in rural Nepal. Comparative Education Review, 30(4), 508–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stash, S., & Hannum, E. (2001). Who goes to school? Educational stratification by gender, caste and ethnicity in Nepal. Comparative Education Review, 45(3), 354–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, J., & Thomas, D. (1995). Human resources: Empirical modeling of household and family decisions. In J. R. Behrman & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economic (Vol. 3a, pp. 1885–2023). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, M. (1998). Economic growth and the persistence of child labor: Evidence from an Indian city. World Development, 26, 1523–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UIS [UNESCO Institute for Statistics] (2005). Children out of school: Measuring exclusion from primary education. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2003a). South and East Asia regional report. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2003b). Gender and Education for All: The leap to equality. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2010). EFA Global Monitoring Report: Reaching the marginalized. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, D., & Reimers, F. (1995). Hope or despair?: Learning in Pakistan’s primary schools. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1997). Primary education in India. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000). Bangladesh education sector review. Dhaka: The University Press Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007). South Asia: Human Development Sector. Attaining the health and education Millennium Development Goals in Nepal (Discussion Paper Series, No. 12). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amita Chudgar.

About this article

Cite this article

Chudgar, A., Shafiq, M.N. Family, community, and educational outcomes in South Asia. Prospects 40, 517–534 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-010-9169-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-010-9169-z

Keywords

Navigation