Abstract
Cognitive dissonance theory predicts that the act of voting makes people more positive toward the party or candidate they have voted for. Following Mullainathan and Washington (Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 1:86–111, 2009), I test this prediction by using exogenous variation in turnout provided by the voting age restriction. I improve on previous studies by investigating political attitudes, measured just before elections, when they are highly predictive of voting. In contrast to earlier studies I find no effect of voting on political attitudes. This result holds for both Sweden and the United States.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akerlof, G. A. (1989). The economics of illusion. Economics and Politics, 1, 1–15.
Akerlof, G. A., & Dickens, W. T. (1982). The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. American Economic Review, 72, 307–319.
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99, 153–167.
Anderson, C., Mendes, S., & Tverdova, Y. (2004). Endogenous economic voting: evidence from the 1997 British election. Electoral Studies, 23, 683–708.
Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 303–311.
Beasley, R., & Joslyn, M. (2001). Cognitive dissonance and post-decision attitude change in six presidential elections. Political Psychology, 22, 521–540.
Boeri, T., & Tabellini, G. (2010, in press). Does information increase political support for pension reform? Public Choice. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9706-6.
Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and decision—the pure theory of electoral preferences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Caplan, B. (2001). Rational ignorance versus rational irrationality. Kykols, 54, 3–26.
Caplan, B. (2002). Systematically biased beliefs about economics: robust evidence of content-dependent judgmental anomalies from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy. Economic Journal, 112, 1–26.
Caplan, B. (2006). How do voters form positive economic beliefs? Evidence from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy. Public Choice, 128, 367–381.
Chen, K., & Risen, J. (2010). How choice affects and reflects preferences: revisiting the free-choice paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 573–594.
Congelton, R. (2001). Rational ignorance, rational voter expectations, and public policy: a discrete informational foundation for fiscal illusion. Public Choice, 107, 35–64.
Cooper, J. (1980). Reducing fears and increasing assertiveness: the role of dissonance reduction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 354–363.
Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: fifty years of a classic theory. London: Sage.
Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229–264). Orlando: Academic Press.
Della Vigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007). The fox news effect: media bias and voting. Quarterly Journal of Economic, 122, 1187–1234.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Egan, L. C., Santos, L. R., & Bloom, P. (2007). The origins of cognitive dissonance: evidence from children and monkeys. Psychological Science, 18, 978–983.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1964). When prophecy fails: a social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction of the world. New York: Harper.
Gerber, A. S., Karlan, D., & Bergan, D. (2009). Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions. American Economic Journal—Applied Economics, 1, 35–52.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (Eds.) (1999). Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Holmberg, S., & Oscarsson, H. (2004). Väljare. In Svenskt väljarbeteende under 50 år. Stockholm: Nordstedts Juridik AB.
Jordahl, H. (2006). An economic analysis of voting in Sweden. Public Choice, 127, 251–265.
Konow, J. (2000). Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. American Economic Review, 90, 1072–1091.
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2006). Does economics still matter? Econometrics and the vote. Journal of Politics, 68, 208–212.
Masters, J. (2005). A midwestern response to the events of September 11, 2001. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 10, 369–381.
Mullainathan, S., & Washington, E. (2009). Sticking with your vote: cognitive dissonance and political attitudes. American Economic Journal—Applied Economics, 1, 86–111.
Östling, R. (2009). Economic influences on moral values. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 9, Advances, Article 2.
Rabin, M. (1994). Cognitive dissonance and social change. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23, 177–194.
Stone, J., Aronson, E., Crain, A. L., Winslow, M. P., & Fried, C. B. (1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means of encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 116–128.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
11127_2011_9791_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary material to: “Correcting mistakes: Cognitive dissonance and political attitudes in Sweden and the United States” (PDF 94 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elinder, M. Correcting mistakes: cognitive dissonance and political attitudes in Sweden and the United States. Public Choice 153, 235–249 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9791-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9791-1