Abstract
Purpose
To compare two different approaches to performing focus groups and individual interviews, an open approach, and an approach based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
Methods
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis attended focus groups (n = 49) and individual interviews (n = 21). Time, number of concepts, ICF categories identified, and sample size for reaching saturation of data were compared. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and independent t tests were performed.
Results
With an overall time of 183 h, focus groups were more time consuming than individual interviews (t = 9.782; P < 0.001). In the open approach, 188 categories in the focus groups and 102 categories in the interviews were identified compared to the 231 and 110 respective categories identified in the ICF-based approach. Saturation of data was reached after performing five focus groups and nine individual interviews in the open approach and five focus groups and 12 individual interviews in the ICF-based approach.
Conclusion
The method chosen should depend on the objective of the study, issues related to the health condition, and the study’s participants. We recommend performing focus groups if the objective of the study is to comprehensively explore the patient perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Giacomini, M., & Cook, D. (2000). Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care, a. Are the results of the study valide. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 357–362.
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320, 50–52.
Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S., & Watson, P. (1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature (Vol. 2, no. 16). Southampton: Health Technology Assessment.
Oehman, A. (2005). Qualitative methodology for rehabilitation research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 273–280.
Moffatt, S., White, M., Mackintosh, J., & Howel, D. (2007). Using quantitative and qualitative data in health service research—what happens when mixed method findings conflict? Health Service Research, 6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-1186-1128.
Fern, E. (1982). The use of focus groups for idea generation: The effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(1), 1–13.
Kroll, T., Neri, M., & Miller, K. (2005). Using mixed methods in disability and rehabilitation research. Rehabilitation Nursing, 30(3), 106–113.
Morgan, D. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Sim, J. (1998). Collecting and analysing qualitative data: Issues raised by the focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(2), 345–352.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews—an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. California: Sage.
Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narratives and semi-structured methods. London: Sage.
Stewart, D., & Shamdasani, P. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park: Sage.
Morgan, D. (1998). The focus group guidebook. Focus group kit I. Thousand Oak: Sage.
Carey, M. (Ed.). (1994). Issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299–302.
Morgan, D. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. London: Sage.
Kingry, M., Tiedje, L., & Friedman, L. (1990). Focus groups: A research technique for nursing. Nursing Research, 39(2), 124–125.
Thomas, L., MacMillan, J., McColl, E., Hale, C., & Bond, S. (1995). Comparison of focus group and individual interview methodology in examining patient satisfaction with nursing care. Social Sciences in Health, 1(4), 206–220.
World Health Organisation. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO.
Coenen, M., Cieza, A., Stamm, T., Amann, E., Kollerits, B., & Stucki, G. (2006). Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 8, R84. doi:10.1186/ar1956.
Stamm, T., Cieza, A., Coenen, M., Machold, K., Nell, V., Smolen, J., et al. (2005). Validating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Comprehensive Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective: A qualitative study. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 53(3), 431–439.
Arnett, F., Edworthy, S., Bloch, D., McShane, D., Fries, J., Cooper, N., et al. (1988). The American rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 31(3), 315–324.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Ustun, B., & Stucki, G. (2005). ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(4), 212–218.
Cieza, A., Brockow, T., Ewert, T., Amman, E., Kollerits, B., Chatterji, S., et al. (2002). Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34(5), 205–210.
Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2004). New approaches to understanding the impact of musculoskeletal conditions. Best Practice & Research in Clinical Rheumatology, 18(2), 141–154.
Stucki, G., Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Battistella, L., Lloyd, J., Symmons, D., et al. (2004). ICF Core Sets for rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(Suppl), 87–93.
Thornton, C. (1996). A focus group inquiry into the perceptions of primary health care teams and the provision of health care for adults with a learning disability living in the community. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(6), 1168–1176.
Basch, C. (1987). Focus group interviews: An under-utilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Education Quarterly, 14(4), 411–448.
Krueger, R. (1995). The future of focus groups. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 524–530.
Parsons, M., & Greenwood, J. (2000). A guide to the use of focus groups in health care research: Part 1. Contemporary Nurse, 9(2), 169–180.
Rat, A.-C., Pouchot, J., Guillemin, F., Baumann, M., Retel-Rude, N., Spitz, E., et al. (2007). Content of quality-of-life instruments is affected by item-generation methods. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 390–398.
Powell, R., Single, H., & Lloyd, K. (1996). Focus groups in mental health research: Enhancing the validity of user and provider questionnaires. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 42, 193–206.
Coté-Arsenault, D., & Morrison-Beedy, D. (2005). Maintaining your focus in focus groups: Avoiding common mistakes. Research in Nursing and Health, 28, 172–179.
Carey, A. (1994). The group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 225–241). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Greenbaum, T. (2000). Moderating focus groups. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Kitzinger, J., & Barbour, R. (Eds.). (1999). Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups (Vol. 1–20). London: Sage.
Ezzy, D. (2001). Are qualitative methods misunderstood? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(4), 294–297.
Ward, V., Bertrand, J., & Brown, L. (1994). The comparability of focus groups and survey results. Evaluative Reviews, 15(2), 266–283.
Clarke, A. (1999). Focus group interviews in health-care research. Professional Nurse, 14(6), 395–397.
Westhoff, G., Listing, J., & Zink, A. (2000). Loss of physical independence in rheumatoid arthritis: Interview data from a representative sample of patients in rheumatologic care. Arthritis Care & Research, 13, 11–22.
Zink, A., Listing, J., Klindworth, C., & Zeidler, H. (2001). The national database of the german collaborative arthritis centres: I. Structures, aims, and patients. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 60, 199–206.
Ahlmén, M., Nordenskiöld, U., Archenholtz, B., Thyberg, I., Rönnqvist, T., Lindén, L., et al. (2005). Rheumatology outcomes: The patient’s perspective. A multicentre focus group interview study of Swedish rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology, 44, 105–110.
Albers, J., Kuper, H., van Riel, P., Prevoo, M., ‘t Hof, M., van Gestel, A., et al. (1999). Socio-economic consequences of rheumatoid arthritis in the first years of the disease. Rheumatology, 38, 423–430.
Jackson, P. (1998). Focus group interviews as a methodology. Nurse Researcher, 6(1), 72–84.
Clark, J. M., Maben, J., & Jones, K. (1996). The use of focus group interviews in nursing research: Issues and challenges. Nursing Times Research, 1(2), 143–153.
Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rasch, G. (1992). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: MESA Press.
Acknowledgments
The performance of the focus groups was funded by the German self-help organization “Deutsche Rheuma-Liga e.V.–Bundesverband.” We thank Mrs. Elke Ruschek and Mrs. Sieglinde Stamm for their competent and precise transcribing of the focus groups and individual interviews. We would like to thank all patients who participated in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Michaela Coenen, Gerold Stucki, and Alarcos Cieza—ICF Research Branch in cooperation with the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in Germany (at DIMDI). The responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the ICF Research Branch.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coenen, M., Stamm, T.A., Stucki, G. et al. Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods. Qual Life Res 21, 359–370 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9943-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9943-2