Abstract
Research suggests that morphological awareness facilitates word decoding, improves lexical knowledge, and helps reading comprehension (Carlisle, 2010; Nagy et al., 2014; Verhoeven & Perfetti, 2011). The present study examined the relationship among morphological awareness, word recognition and reading comprehension in 153 second- and fifth-grade Hebrew speakers at an elementary school in Israel. Students were given morphological awareness tests and tests for word recognition and reading comprehension. Three types of morphological awareness were analyzed: inflection, derivation and construct formation. Overall, students with low morphological awareness in derivation and construct formation showed relatively poor achievement in word recognition and comprehension. All three types were found to correlate with reading comprehension in readers with high morphological awareness. These readers also exhibited good reading skills. The results are discussed with regard to the special characteristics of Hebrew morphology and reading process, which aid morphological decomposition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ben-Dror, I., Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonologic and morphologic skills in reading disabled and normal children: Evidence from perception and production of spoken Hebrew. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 876–893.
Berman, R. A. (2000). Children’s innovative verbs vs. nouns: Structured elicitations and spontaneous coinages. In L. Menn & N. Bernstein-Ratner (Eds.), Methods for studying language production (pp. 69–93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Berman, R. A. (2002). Children’s lexical innovations: Developmental perspectives on Hebrew verb structure. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology (pp. 243–291). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179.
Breznitz, Z., Nevo, B., & Shatil, E. (2004). ELUL: Learning disabilities diagnostic test in Hebrew and Arabic languages for grades 1 to 10. Haifa: Haifa Press.
Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291–322.
Carlisle, J. F. (2007). Fostering morphological processing, vocabulary development and reading comprehension. In R. Wagner, A. Muse, & K. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition (pp. 78–104). New York: Guilford Press.
Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 464–487.
Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 239–253.
Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449.
Cohen, A., Schiff, R., & Gillis-Carlebach, M. (1996). Hashva’at haosher hamorfologi, taxbiri, v’narativi ben yeladim hamitkashim b’kria l’ven yeladim yodei-kro. [Complexity of morphological, syntactic and narrative characteristics: A comparison of children with reading difficulties and children who know how to read.]. Megamot, 37(3), 273–291.
Deacon, S. H., Benere, J., & Pasquarella, A. (2013). Reciprocal relationship: Children’s morphological awareness and their reading accuracy across grades 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1113.
Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 223–238.
Fowler, A. E., & Liberman, I. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Frost, R. (2011). Looking across orthographies. In P. McCardle, J. R. Lee, O. J. L. Tzeng, & B. Miller (Eds.), Dyslexia across languages: Orthography, and the brain-gene-behavior link. Baltimore, MD: Brooks Publishing.
Gilbert, J. K., Goodwin, A. P., Compton, D. L., & Kearns, D. M. (2013). Multisyllabic word reading as a moderator of morphological awareness and reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 0022219413509966.
Gonter-Gaustad, M., & Kelly, R. (2004). The relationship between reading achievement and morphological word analysis in deaf and hearing students matched for reading level. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 269–285.
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60(2), 183–208.
Katz, L. A., & Carlisle, J. F. (2009). Teaching students with reading difficulties to be close readers: A feasibility study. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in School, 40, 325–340.
Kieffer, M. J. (2013). Morphological awareness and reading difficulties in adolescent Spanish-speaking language minority learners and their classmates. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 0022219413509968.
Kirk, C., & Gillon, T. G. (2009). Integrated morphological awareness intervention as a tool for improving literacy. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 40, 341–351.
Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161–180.
Levin, I., Ravid, D., & Rapaport, S. (2001). Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade. Journal of Child Language, 28, 741–772.
Marcolini, S., Traficante, D., Zoccolotti, P., & Burani, C. (2011). Word frequency modulates morpheme-based reading in poor and skilled Italian readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(3), 513–532.
Meunier, F., & Longtin, C. M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457–471.
Nagy, W. E., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. C. (2006). Contribution of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.
Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P. (2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 3–12.
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 289–307.
Ravid, D. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 459–485.
Ravid, D. (2002). A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ravid, D. (2006). Word-level morphology: A psycholinguistic perspective on linear formation in Hebrew nominals. Morphology, 16, 127–148.
Ravid, D., & Bar-On, A. (2001). The Semitic root in language acquisition. GALA, 2001 Proceedings. University of Lisbon, Cidade universitaria—Faculdade de letras, Portugal.
Ravid, D., & Malenky, A. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew: A development study. First Language, 21, 25–26.
Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2006). Roots and patterns in Hebrew language development: Evidence from written morphology analogies. Reading and Writing, 19, 789–818.
Rispens, J. E., McBride-Chang, C., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Morphological awareness and early and advanced word recognition and spelling in Dutch. Reading and Writing, 21(6), 587–607.
Schiff, R., & Raveh, M. (2011). Maafianei haibud hamorfologi bmahalax zihui hamila bkerev korim im disleksia hitpatxutit. [Characteristics of morphlogical processing during word recognition among readers with developmental dyslexia.] In D. Aram & O. Korat (Eds.), Literacy and language: Relationship, bilingualism, and difficulties (pp. 399–413). Jerusalem: Magnes.
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2004). Vowel representation in written Hebrew: Phonological, orthographic and morphological contexts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 245–265.
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2007). Morphological analogies in Hebrew-speaking university students with dyslexia compared with typically developing gradeschoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 237–253.
Sénéchal, M., Pagan, S., & Lever, R. (2008). Relations among the frequency of shared reading and 4-year-old children’s vocabulary, morphological and syntax comprehension, and narrative skills. Early Education and Development, 19, 27–44.
Share, D. (2005). Disleksia b’ivrit: hamorfologia vehaortografia haivriot. [Dyslexia in Hebrew: Hebrew morphology and orthography.] Script-Literacy: Research, Study, and Practice, 9, 9–39. Haifa: University of Haifa.
Shimron, J. (2006). Reading Hebrew: The language and the psychology of reading it. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 113–137). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Taft, M., & Ardasinski, S. (2006). Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. The Mental Lexicon, 1, 183–199.
Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., & Cain, K. (2013). Morphological and syntactic awareness in poor comprehenders: Another piece of the puzzle. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 22–33.
Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2011). Morphological awareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 523.
Vaknin, V., & Shimron, J. (2011). Hebrew plural inflection: Linear processing in a semitic language. The Mental Lexicon, 6, 197–244.
Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., & Miller, P. (2011). The importance of vowel diacritics for the temporary retention of high and low frequency Hebrew words of varying syllabic length. Memory & Cognition, 39(3), 516–526.
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Morphological processing in reading acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 457–466.
Wolf, M. (2008). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. Cambridge: Icon.
Wolter, J. A., & Dilworth, V. (2014). The effects of a multilinguistic morphological awareness approach for improving language and literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 76–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The young reader of Hebrew learns to read using a writing system with vowel diacritics containing full phonological information of the spoken word; but beginning in third or fourth grade, the student makes the transition to reading a system of writing without vowel diacritics, one that represents only the consonants of the word from spoken language.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Sarid, M. & Shimron, J. Morphological awareness and reading in second and fifth grade: evidence from Hebrew. Read Writ 29, 229–244 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9587-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9587-7