Abstract
Given the continued issue of student retention for online classes, past research has suggested several “retention strategies” focused on engaging students as a way to reduce their withdrawal rate from these classes. However, a recent study testing the effects of these strategies on retention in online undergraduate business courses (Leeds et al., Int J Manage Educ 7(1/2), 2013) did not show empirical support for the effectiveness of such strategies. Taking an alternative approach that focuses on individual characteristics of students, this study takes a broader view and examines previous research literature on traditional face-to-face classes to determine how individual characteristics of students may be associated with the likelihood of withdrawal from online classes. Using a sample of undergraduate students (n = 2,314) from a large state university, results from this study identified prior performance in college classes (cumulative GPA) and class standing (senior vs. non-senior) as significant student characteristics related to student retention in online classes for all students. Other factors significantly related to retention rates for students with certain characteristics or within certain majors include previous withdrawal from online courses, gender, and receipt of academic loans.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2010). Staying the course: Online education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
Altonji, J. G. (1993). The demand for and return to education when education outcomes are uncertain. Journal of Labor Economics, (1), 48.
Angelino, L., Williams, F., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1–14.
Arbaugh, J. B., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006). An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 435–447.
Bean, J. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and a test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12, 155–187.
Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485–540.
Bergman, J. Z., Westerman, J. W., & Daly, J. P. (2010). Narcissism in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 119–131.
Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39–A41.
DesJardins, S., Ahlburg, D., & McCall, B. (2002). A temporal investigation of factors related to timely degree completion. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 555–582.
Dobbs, R. R., Waid, C. A., & del Carmen, A. (2009). Students’ perceptions of online courses: The effect of online course experience. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(1), 9–26.
Frydenberg, J. (2007). Persistence in University Continuing Education Online Classes. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(3), 1–15.
Horn, L. (1998). Stopouts or stayouts? Undergraduates who leave college their first year. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: Wiley.
Ishitani, T. T., & DesJardins, S. L. (2002–2003). A longitudinal investigation of dropout from college in the United States. Journal of College Student Retention, 4, 173–201.
Leeds, E., Campbell, S., Baker, H., Ali, R., & Crisp, J. (2013). the impact of student retention strategies: An empirical study. International Journal of Management in Education, 7(1/2), 22–43.
Light, A. (1996). Hazard model estimates of the decision to reenroll in school. Labor Economics, 2, 381–406.
Metzner, B. S., & Bean, J. P. (1987). The estimation of a conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 27(1), 15–38.
Murtaugh, P., Burns, L., & Schuster, J. (1999). Predicting the retention of university students. Research in Higher Education, 40, 355–371.
Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 1–16.
Singell, L. (2004). Come and stay a while: Does financial aid effect retention conditioned on enrollment at a large public university? Economics of Education Review, 23(5), 459–471.
Singell, L., & Waddell, G. (2010). Modeling retention at a large public university: Can at-risk students be identified early enough to treat? Research in Higher Education, 51, 546–572.
St. John, E., Hu, S., & Weber, J. (2001). State policy on the affordability of public higher education: The influence of state grants on persistence in Indiana. Research in Higher Education, 42, 401–428.
Stratton, L., O’Toole, D., & Wetzel, J. (2007). Are the factors affecting dropout behavior related to initial enrollment intensity for college undergraduates? Research in Higher Education, 48(4), 453–485.
Thomas, S. L., & Zhang, L. (2005). Post-baccalaureate wage growth within 4 years of graduation: The effects of college quality and college major. Research in Higher Education, 46(4), 437–459.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention, 8(1), 1–20.
Willging, P., & Johnson, S. (2009). Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 115–127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cochran, J.D., Campbell, S.M., Baker, H.M. et al. The Role of Student Characteristics in Predicting Retention in Online Courses. Res High Educ 55, 27–48 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9305-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9305-8