Abstract
Increasing the size and diversity of the scientific and technological workforce is a national priority. Investments in policy and programmatic efforts toward increasing the representation of women in science and engineering fields have resulted in significant advances; however, a gender gap remains among PhDs and faculty in these fields. This study tests whether Kanter’s (Men and women of the corporation, Basic Books, New York, 1977) theory of proportions, which suggests that numerical representation of groups influence group dynamics and cultural context, applies to the proportion of female faculty and the probability that female doctoral students will complete their degrees in science and engineering. Using data from two research-intensive academic institutions, results show that female doctoral students are more likely to complete the degree in departments with higher proportions of female faculty. Further, female PhD students working with female faculty dissertation advisors are also more likely to complete the degree than female PhD students working with male faculty dissertation advisors. Departmental faculty sex ratios and whether their faculty advisor is male or female, however, have no effect on the completion probabilities of male PhD students. Consistent with Kanter’s theory, research findings illustrate the importance of organizational demography on the academic outcomes of PhD students, and provide support for initiatives and programs aimed at increasing the representation of female faculty in science and engineering.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
While I show the results for the models with master’s degree as a variable, I also conducted the analyses using GRE quantitative scores for the subset of students for whom there were data—the resulting estimates for the effect of proportion of female faculty are consistent with those shown in Table 2.
References
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. New York: Harvester.
Ampaw, F., & Jaeger, A. (2012). Completing the three stages of doctoral education: An event history analysis. Research in Higher Education, 53(6), 640–660.
Arrison, T., & Olson, S. (2012). Rising above the gathering storm: Developing regional innovation environments: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
Bailyn, L. (2003). Academic careers and gender equity: Lessons learned from MIT1. Gender, Work & Organization, 10(2), 137–153.
Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. American Psychologist, 41(12), 1389–1391.
Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2005). Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. The American Economic Review, 95(2), 152–157.
Blake-Beard, S., Bayne, M., Crosby, F., & Muller, C. (2011). Matching by race and gender inmentoring relationships: Keeping our eyes on the prize. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 622–643.
Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the PhD. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Carpenter, S. (2012, March). Does a professional science master’s degree pay off? Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2012/03/does-professional-science-masters-degree-pay.
Carrell, S., Page, M., & West, J. (2009). Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap (Working Paper 14959). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Ceci, S., Ginther, D., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. (2014). Women in academic science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141.
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(8), 3157–3162.
Council of Graduate Schools. (2008). Ph.D. completion project: Program completion and attrition data. Retrieved from http://www.phdcompletion.org/quantitative/book2_quant.asp.
Council of Graduate Schools. (2009). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Findings from exit surveys of Ph.D. completers. Retrieved from http://www.phdcompletion.org/information/book3.asp.
Council of Graduate Schools. (2010). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Policies and practices to promote student success. Retrieved from http://www.phdcompletion.org/information/book4.asp.
Council of Graduate Schools. (2015). Doctoral initiative on minority attrition and completion. Retrieved from http://cgsnet.org/ckfinder/userfiles/files/Doctoral_Initiative_on_Minority_Attrition_and_Completion_2015.pdf.
Ehrenberg, R. G., Jakubson, G. H., Martin, M. L., Main, J. B., & Eisenberg, T. (2012). Diversifying the faculty across gender lines: Do trustees and administrators matter? Economics of Education Review, 31(1), 9–18.
Ehrenberg, R., Zuckerman, H., Groen, J., & Brucker, S. (2010). Educating scholars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ely, R. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 203–238.
Espenshade, T., & Rodriguez, G. (1997). Completing the PhD: Comparative performances of US and foreign students. Social Science Quarterly, 78(2), 593–605.
Executive Office of the President. (2014). Women and girls in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/stem_factsheet_2013_07232013.pdf.
Fouad, N. A., Singh, R., Cappaert, K., Chang, W. H., & Wan, M. (2016). Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 79–93.
Gardner, S., & Mendoza, P. (2010). On becoming a scholar: Socialization and development in doctoral education. Sterling: Stylus.
Gibson, D. E. (2004). Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 134–156.
Glass, J. L., Sassler, S., Levitte, Y., & Michelmore, K. M. (2013). What’s so special about STEM? A comparison of women’s retention in STEM and professional occupations. Social Forces, 92(2), 723–757.
Golde, C. M. (2000). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. The Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 199–227.
Golde, C. (2015). The formation of scholars: Insights of the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate. GeoJournal, 80(2), 209–213.
Golde, C., & Dore, T. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Retrieved from http://www.phdcompletion.org/promising/Golde.pdf.
Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Retrieved from http://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science-Technology-Engineering-and-Mathematics.pdf.
Hilmer, C., & Hilmer, M. (2007). Women helping women, men helping women? Same-gender mentoring, initial job placements, and early career publishing success for economics PhDs. American Economic Review, 97(2), 422–426.
Hogg, M., & Terry, D. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140.
Huffman, M., Cohen, P., & Pearlman, J. (2010). Engendering change: Organizational dynamics and workplace gender desegregation, 1975-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 255–277.
Hunt, J. (2016). Why do women leave science and engineering? ILR Review, 69(1), 199–226.
Izraeli, D. N. (1983). Sex effects or structural effects? An empirical test of Kanter’s theory of proportions. Social Forces, 62(1), 153–165.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Lovitts, B. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Main, J. B. (2012). Trends in doctoral education: Engineering students’ perspectives on faculty advising. Paper presented at the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX.
Main, J. B. (2014). Gender homophily, Ph.D. completion, and time to degree in the humanities and humanistic social sciences. The Review of Higher Education, 37(3), 349–375.
Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1183–1193.
Mendoza, P., Villarreal, P., & Gunderson, A. (2014). Within-year retention among Ph.D. students: The effect of debt, assistantships, and fellowships. Research in Higher Education, 55(7), 650–685.
Millett, C. M., & Nettles, M. T. (2009). Three ways of winning doctoral education. In R. Ehrenberg, C. Kuh, & Cornell Higher Education Research Institute (Eds.). Doctoral education and the faculty of the future (pp. 65–79). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879–885.
National Science Foundation. (2015). Completions survey, 2002–2012. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15311/tables.cfm.
Nerad, M., & Miller, D. S. (1996). Increasing student retention in graduate and professional programs. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996(92), 61–76.
Nettles, M., & Millett, C. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Neumark, D., & Gardecki, R. (1998). Women helping women? Role model and mentoring effects of female Ph.D. students in economics. The Journal of Human Resources, 33(1), 220–246.
Preston, A. E. (2004). Leaving science: Occupational exit from scientific careers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Quimby, J. L., & DeSantis, A. M. (2006). The influence of role models on women’s career choices. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(4), 297–306.
Rask, K. N., & Bailey, E. M. (2002). Are faculty role models? Evidence from major choice in an undergraduate institution. The Journal of Economic Education, 33(2), 99–124.
Rothstein, D. S. (1995). Do female faculty influence students’ educational and labor market attainments? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(3), 515–530.
Sallee, M. W. (2010). The individual and the institution: Socialization and gender. In S. K. Gardner & P. Mendoza (Eds.), On becoming a scholar: Doctoral student socialization and development (pp. 137–156). Sterling: Stylus.
Sallee, M. W. (2011). Performing masculinity: Considering gender in doctoral student socialization. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 187–216.
Schroeder, D., & Mynatt, C. (1993). Female graduate students' perceptions of their interactions with male and female major professors. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 555–573.
Schroeder, D., & Mynatt, S. (1999). Graduate students’ relationships with their male and female major professors. Sex Roles, 40(5), 393–420.
Sonnert, G., Fox, M. F., & Adkins, K. (2007). Undergraduate women in science and engineering: Effects of faculty, fields, and institutions over time. Social Sciences Quarterly, 88(5), 1333–1356.
Stout, J., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., McManus, M., & Simpson, J. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255–270.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1984). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Theodosiou, M., Rennard, J.-P., & Amir-Aslani, A. (2012). The rise of the professional master’s degree: The answer to the postdoc/PhD bubble. Nature Biotechnology, 30(4), 367–368.
Tolbert, P., & Oberfield, A. (1991). Sources of organizational demography: Faculty sex ratios in colleges and universities. Sociology of Education, 64(4), 305–315.
Tolbert, P. S., Simons, T., Andrews, A., & Rhee, J. (1995). The effects of gender composition in academic departments on faculty turnover. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(3), 562–579.
Turner, C., González, J., Wong, K., & Stevenson, M. R. (2011). Faculty women of color: The critical nexus of race and gender. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(4), 199–211.
Walker, G., & Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Walton, G., Cohen, G., & Dovidio, J. F. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82–96.
Wendler, C., Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., Millett, C., Rock, J., Bell, N., et al. (2010). The path forward: The future of graduate education in the United States. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Wharton, A. (1992). The social construction of gender and race in organizations: A social identity and group mobilization perspective. In P. Tolbert & S. Bacharach (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 10, pp. 55–84). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Yoder, B. (2016). Engineering by the numbers. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/documents/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/16Profile-Front-Section.pdf.
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the Cornell University Center for the Study of Inequality (CSI). Initial support of this research also came from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation through a grant to the Cornell Higher Education Research Institute. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation or the Cornell University Center for the Study of Inequality. The author deeply appreciate the funding support from Cornell CSI and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. The author thanks Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Pamela S. Tolbert, Stephen L. Morgan, Russell P. Main, and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A previous version of this work was presented at the 2013 Association for the Study of Higher Education Conference, November 2013.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Main, J.B. Kanter’s Theory of Proportions: Organizational Demography and PhD Completion in Science and Engineering Departments. Res High Educ 59, 1059–1073 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9499-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9499-x