Abstract
As teachers' knowledge determines to a large extent how they respond to educational innovation, it is necessary for innovators to take this knowledge into account when implementing educational changes. This study aimed at identifying patterns in the content and the structure of science teachers' knowledge, at a point in time when they still had little experience in teaching a new subject, that is, Public Understanding of Science. We investigated three domains of teacher knowledge: Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), subject-matter knowledge, and general pedagogical knowledge. A semi-structured interview and a questionnaire were used. From the analysis of the data, two types of teacher knowledge emerged. One of the types was more integrated and more extended in terms of PCK. Teachers who represented this type of knowledge had developed PCK that connected the various programme domains of the new science subject. In both types, PCK was found to be consistent with general pedagogical knowledge. In both types, however, subject-matter knowledge was similar, and not directly related to the other knowledge domains. Implications for the implementation of the new subject are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument. Views on Science-Technology-Society (VOSTS). Science Education, 76, 477–491.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bolhuis, S. M. (1995). Leren en veranderen bij volwassenen, een nieuwe benadering. [Learning and changing in adults, a new approach]. Bussum, The Netherlands: Coutinho.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Macmillan.
Carter, K. (1990). Teachers' knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291–310). New York: Macmillan.
Clark, C. M. (1986). Ten years of conceptual development in research on teacher thinking. In M. Ben-Peretz, R. Bromme, & R. Halkes (Eds.), Advances in research on teacher thinking. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Clark, C., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.
Cochran, F. K., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 261–272.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge and the modes of knowing: Relevance for teaching and learning. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing (pp. 174–198). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19, 2–14.
De Vos, W., & Reiding, J. (1999). Public understanding of science as a separate subject in secondary schools in The Netherlands. International Journal of Science Eduation, 21, 711–719.
Duffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teacher practical knowledge. Science Education, 76, 493–506.
Ebbens, S. O. (1994). Op weg naar zelfstandig leren, effecten van nascholing. [A way to self regulated learning, outcomes of continued professional training]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Eijkelhof, H. M. C., & Kortland, J. (1988). Broadening the aims of physics education. In P. J. Fensham (Ed), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 282–305). London: Falmer.
Emans, B. (1989). Interviewen. Theorie, techniek en training. [Interview: Theory, methods, and training]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer.
Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit-knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.
Fox, D. (1983). Personal theories of teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 8(2), 151–163.
Gergen, M. M. (1988). Narrative structures in social explanation. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analysing social explanation (pp. 94–112). London: Sage. Hargreaves.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnic, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Simon & Shuster Macmillan.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York/London: Teachers College.
Harrison, A. G. (2001). Models and PCK: Their relevance for practicing and preservice teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, Michigan.
Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: An exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 541–562.
Huberman, M. (1993). The model of an independent artisan in teachers' professional relations. In J. Little & M. Mc Laughlin (Eds.), Teachers' work. New York: Teachers College.
Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Science teachers' knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1273–1292.
Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419–469.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs, Vols. 1 & 2. New York: Norton. [Republished (1999) London: Routledge.].
Kwakman, K. (1999). Leren van docenten tijdens de beroepsloopbaan.[Teacher learning during professional career]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3–11.
Martinez, M. A. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 965–977.
Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (1999). Exploring language teachers' practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 59–84.
Northern Examinations and Assessment Board (NEAB). (1998). Science for public understanding (syllabus). Harrogate, UK: NEAB.
Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1993). Your nature of science profile: An activity for science teachers. School Science Review, 75, 109–112.
Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. (2003). Secondary and higher education teachers' conceptions about self-regulated Learning. EARLI Conference with Paper presented at the bienniel conference of EARLI 2003, Italy.
Pope, M., & Denicolo, P. (2001). Transformative education. Personal construct approaches to practice and research. London, Philadelphia: Whurr.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International Handbook of Teachers and Teaching, (2, 1223–1296). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practioner. San Fransico: Jossey-Bass.
Shimahara, N. K. (1998). The Japanese model of professional development: Teaching as craft. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 451–462.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15, 4–14.
SLO Voorlichtingsbrochure ANW. (1996). Voorlichtingsbrochure havo/vwo Algemene natuurwetenschappen [Information Brochure on Public Understanding of Science]. Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO.
Thompson, C. L., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession. Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 341–375). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.
Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of models and modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1141–1153.
Verloop, N. (1992). Praktijkkennis van docenten: een blinde vlek van de onderwijskunde. [Craft knowledge of teachers: A blind spot in educational research]. Pedagogische Studiën, 69, 410–423.
Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 441–461.
Wallace, J. (2003). Learning about teacher learning: Reflections of a science educator. In J. Wallace & J. Loughran (Eds.), Leadership and professional development in science education: New possibilities for enhancing teacher learning (pp. 1–16). London, New York: Routledge Falmer.
Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1995). Drawing ourselves into teaching: Studying the images that shape and distort teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 303–313.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henze, I., van Driel, J.H. & Verloop, N. Science Teachers' Knowledge about Teaching Models and Modelling in the Context of a New Syllabus on Public Understanding of Science. Res Sci Educ 37, 99–122 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9017-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9017-6