Abstract
Student start-ups are a significant part of overall university entrepreneurship. Yet, we know little about the determinants of this type of start-ups and, specifically, the relevance of context effects. Drawing on organizational and regional context literature, we develop and test a model that aims to explain student entrepreneurship in a contextual perspective. Based on unique micro-data and using multi-level techniques, we analyse nascent and new entrepreneurial activities of business and economics students at 41 European universities. Our analysis reveals that individual and contextual determinants influence students’ propensity to start a business. While peoples’ individual characteristics are most important, the organizational and regional contexts also play a role and have a differentiated effect, depending on the source of the venture idea and the stage of its development. Organizational characteristics, like the prevalence of fellow students who have attended entrepreneurship education, influence whether students take action to start a new firm (nascent entrepreneurship) but do not seem to support the actual establishment of a new firm. In contrast, the latter is less dependent on the university context but more strongly influenced by regional characteristics. Overall, our study contributes to our understanding of the emergence of start-ups in the organizational context of universities and has implications for initiatives and programs that aim at encouraging students to become entrepreneurs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We refrain from including the national level in our analysis because this would have required a different research design involving a greater number of countries. Also, a preliminary analysis suggests that the proportion of variance at the national level is only small when accounting for the individual, organizational, and regional level.
To the best of our knowledge, there is only one study that discovers a statistically significant negative impact of regional GDP/capita on nascent entrepreneurial activities (Bergmann and Sternberg 2007), the reasons of which were presumably related to the very specific and unusual situation after the burst of the dotcom bubble 2000–2002.
The following 41 universities are included in the analysis (sorted by country): Austria: FH Salzburg; France: ESCP Paris; Euromed Marseille; Groupe ESC Troyes; Germany: Hochschule Aalen; Univ. Bayreuth; FH Coburg; Univ. Düsseldorf; Hochschule Esslingen; Zeppelin Univ. Friedrichshafen; Univ. Göttingen; FH Hannover; Univ. Hannover; Hochschule Konstanz; FH Ludwigshafen; Univ. Siegen; Univ. Witten/Herdecke; Westsächsische Hochschule Zwickau; Hungary: EJF—Eötvös József Foiskola (Eötvös József College); ME—Miskolci Egyetem (University of Miskolc); SZE—Széchenyi István Egyetem (Szechenyi Istvan University); Luxembourg: Univ. du Luxembourg; Netherlands: Erasmus Univ. Rotterdam; Hogeschool Utrecht; Hotelschool Den Haag; Nyenrode Business University; Rijksuniv. Groningen; Univ. Twente; Univ. Utrecht; FH Campus Wien; Switzerland: Ecole hôtelière de Lausanne; Haute école d'Ingénieurs et de Gestion du Canton de Vaud; Haute école de gestion Arc; Haute école de gestion de Fribourg; Haute école de gestion de Genève; HES-SO MScBA Lausanne; Univ. Bern; Univ. St. Gallen; Univ. de Fribourg; Univ. de Lausanne; Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften.
We do find a small but statistically significant difference between the two groups for gender (females: early: 43.6 %; late: 47.7 %). However, our interpretation of this finding is as follows: male students spend more time per day using the internet (Kleimann et al. 2008) and are, thus, more likely to be early rather than late respondents in an online survey.
The value of 3.5 years has been selected because it is widely used to distinguish owner–managers of new businesses from those of established businesses, e.g. in many studies based on Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data.
The respondents had to answer the following question: “Where did the idea for this business come from?” Multiple answers were possible.
The exact wording of these items can be found in Bergmann (2015).
Because of our survey design, we are not able to make any claims about the representativeness of these findings.
References
Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408–422. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005.
Acs, Z. J., Bosma, N., & Sternberg, R. (2011). Entrepreneurship in world cities. In M. Minniti (Ed.), The dynamics of entrepreneurship: Theory and evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573–596. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9.
Andersson, M., & Koster, S. (2011). Sources of persistence in regional start-up rates-evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 179–201. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp069.
Åstebro, T., Bazzazian, N., & Braguinsky, S. (2012). Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implications for university entrepreneurship policy. Research Policy, 41(4), 663–677. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.004.
Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1.
Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (1994). The geography of firm births in Germany. Regional Studies, 28(4), 359–365. doi:10.1080/00343409412331348326.
Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38(8), 949–959. doi:10.1080/0034340042000280956.
Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.012.
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015.
Backes-Gellner, U., Demirer, G., & Sternberg, R. (2002). Individuelle und regionale Einflussfaktoren auf die Gründungsneigung von Hochschülern. In J. Schmude & J. Leiner (Eds.), Unternehmensgründungen. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zum Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 63–96). Heidelberg: Physica.
Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
Beaudry, C., & Schiffauerova, A. (2009). Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy, 38(2), 318–337. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010.
Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151–161.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0295.
Bergmann, H. (2015). The formation of opportunity beliefs among university entrepreneurs: An empirical study of research- and non-research-driven venture ideas. The Journal of Technology Transfer,. doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9458-z.
Bergmann, H., & Sternberg, R. (2007). The changing face of entrepreneurship in Germany. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3), 205–221. doi:10.1007/s11187-006-9016-z.
BfS. (2013). Selbstständige Erwerbstätigkeit bei Hochschulabsolventinnen und -absolventen. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt fuer Statistik (Swiss Federal Statistical Office).
Bhave, M. (1994). A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(3), 223–242. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)90031-0.
Bird, B., & Schjoedt, L. (2009). Entrepreneurial behavior: Its nature, scope, recent research, and agenda for future research. In A. L. Carsrud & M. Brännback (Eds.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind (pp. 327–358). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0443-0.
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887.
Bosma, N., & Schutjens, V. (2011). Understanding regional variation in entrepreneurial activity and entrepreneurial attitude in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 47(3), 711–742. doi:10.1007/s00168-010-0375-7.
Bosma, N., & Sternberg, R. (2014). Entrepreneurship as an urban event? Empirical evidence from European cities. Regional Studies, 48(6), 1016–1033. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.904041.
Brixy, U., Sternberg, R., & Stüber, H. (2012). The selectiveness of the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(1), 105–131.
Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Reynolds, P. D. (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 151–166. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(95)00129-8.
Casper, S. (2013). The spill-over theory reversed: The impact of regional economies on the commercialization of university science. Research Policy,. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.005.
Commission, European. (2010). Feasibility study for creating a European University data collection. Brussels: Final Study Report.
Dahl, M. S., & Sorenson, O. (2012). Home sweet home: Entrepreneurs’ location choices and the performance of their ventures. Management Science, 58(6), 1059–1071. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1476.
Daraio, C., Bonaccorsi, A., Geuna, A., Lepori, B., Bach, L., Bogetoft, P., et al. (2011). The European university landscape: A micro characterization based on evidence from the Aquameth project. Research Policy, 40(1), 148–164. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.009.
Davidsson, P. (2003). The domain of entrepreneurship research: Some suggestions. In J. Katz & D. A. Shepherd (Eds.), Cognitive approaches. Advances in entrepreneurship. Firm emergence and growth (Vol. 6, pp. 315–372). Oxford: Elsevier/JAI Press.
Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674–695. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002.
Davidsson, P., Gordon, S. R., & Bergmann, H. (2011). Introduction. In P. Davidsson, S. R. Gordon, & H. Bergmann (Eds.), Nascent entrepreneurship (pp. xiii–xxxvi). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Djokovic, D., & Souitaris, V. (2008). Spinouts from academic institutions: A literature review with suggestions for further research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 225–247. doi:10.1007/s10961-006-9000-4.
Drakopoulou Dodd, S., & Hynes, B. C. (2012). The impact of regional entrepreneurial contexts upon enterprise education. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(9–10), 741–766. doi:10.1080/08985626.2011.566376.
Eickelpasch, A., & Fritsch, M. (2005). Contests for cooperation—A new approach in German innovation policy. Research Policy, 34(8), 1269–1282. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.009.
Etzkowitz, H. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of academic-industry-government relations. London: Cassell Academic.
Etzkowitz, H. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
Etzkowitz, H. A., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4.
European Commission. (2012). Effects and impact of entrepreneurship programmes in higher education. Brussels.
Falck, O., Heblich, S., & Luedemann, E. (2012). Identity and entrepreneurship: Do school peers shape entrepreneurial intentions? Small Business Economics, 39(1), 39–59. doi:10.1007/s11187-010-9292-5.
Feldman, M. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 861–891.
Feldman, K., & Newcomb, T. (1969). The impact of college on students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Geissler, M. (2013). Determinanten des Vorgründungsprozesses. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-01665-4.
Geissler, M., Jahn, S., & Haefner, P. (2010). The entrepreneurial climate at universities: The impact of organizational factors. In D. Smallbone, J. Leitao, M. Raposo, & F. Welter (Eds.), The theory and practice of entrepreneurship (pp. 12–31). Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Heine, C., Willich, J., Schneider, H., & Sommer, D. (2008). Studienanfänger im Wintersemester 2007/08: Wege zum Studium, Studien- und Hochschulwahl. Hannover: Situtaion bei Studienbeginn.
Hesse, N. (2015). Career paths of academic entrepreneurs and university spin-off growth. In R. Baptista & J. Leitão (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, human capital, and regional development (pp. 29–57). Heidelberg: Springer.
Holtkamp, R., & Imsande, J. (2001). Selbständigkeit von Hochschulabsolventen—Entwicklungen, Situation und Potential. Hannover: HIS Hochschul-Informations-System.
Hoppe, M. (2015). Policy and entrepreneurship education. Small Business Economics,. doi:10.1007/s11187-015-9676-7.
Houser, C. (2014). Why the university is the ideal startup platform. Wired.com. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2014/02/university-ideal-startup-platform/.
Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Hundt, C. (2012). Zur Erklärung von Gründungsaktivitäten—Eine Mehrebenenanalyse aus individueller, regionaler und nationaler Perspektive. Reihe „Wirtschaftsgeographie“, Bd. 54. Münster: LIT-Verlag.
Hundt, C., & Sternberg, R. (2014). Explaining new firm creation in Europe from a spatial and time perspective: A multilevel analysis based upon data of individuals, regions and countries. Papers in Regional Science,. doi:10.1111/pirs.12133.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.20208687.
Kleimann, B., Özkilic, M., & Göcks, M. (2008). Studieren im Web 2.0. Hannover. Retrieved from https://hisbus.his.de/hisbus/docs/hisbus21.pdf.
Kreft, I. G. (1996). Are multilevel techniques necessary? An overview, including simulation studies. Working paper, California State University, Los Angeles, CA.
Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577–597.
Kwon, S., Heflin, C., & Ruef, M. (2013). Community social capital and entrepreneurship. American Sociological Review, 78(6), 980–1008. doi:10.1080/15575330.2014.880495.
Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., & Rialp, J. (2007). Regional differences in the influence of role models: Comparing the entrepreneurial process of rural Catalonia. Regional Studies, 41(6), 779–796. doi:10.1080/00343400601120247.
Laspita, S., Breugst, N., Heblich, S., & Patzelt, H. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(4), 414–435. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.006.
Lawton Smith, H., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2012). The research university, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(5–6), 383–404. doi:10.1080/08985626.2011.592547.
Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 531–542.
Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211–224. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.002.
Michelacci, C., & Silva, O. (2007). Why so many local entrepreneurs? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(November), 615–633. doi:10.1162/rest.89.4.615.
Minniti, M., & Naudé, W. (2010). What do we know about the patterns and determinants of female entrepreneurship across countries? European Journal of Development Research, 22(3), 277–293.
Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2007). From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 909–935. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00203.x.
Nanda, R., & Sørensen, J. B. (2010). Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(7), 1116–1126. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1179.
Nezlek, J. B. (2011). Multilevel modelling for social and personality psychology. London: Sage.
Oppenheim, A. N. (1966). Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. London: Heinemann.
Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of the evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 479–510. doi:10.1177/0266242607080656.
Porter, S. R., & Whitcomb, M. E. (2003). The impact of lottery incentives on student survey response rates. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 389–407.
Qian, H., & Acs, Z. J. (2013). An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 185–197. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9368-x.
Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602–612. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.002.
Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2011). The evolution of entrepreneurial competencies: A longitudinal study of university spin-off venture emergence. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1314–1345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00995.x.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analyses methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R., & du Toit, M. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling. Lincolnwood, IL: SSI Scientific Software International.
Rentsch, J. R. (1990). Climate and culture: Interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 668–681. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.75.6.668.
Reynolds, P. D. (2005). Understanding business creation: Serendipity and scope in two decades of business creation studies. Small Business Economics, 24(4), 359–364. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-0692-x.
Reynolds, P. D., Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Greene, P. G. (2004). The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics, 23(4), 263–284. doi:10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000032046.59790.45.
Reynolds, P. D., & Curtin, R. T. (2008). Business creation in the United States: Panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics II initial assessment. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 155–307. doi:10.1561/0300000022.
Reynolds, P. D., Miller, B., & Maki, W. R. (1995). Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U.S. 1976–88. Small Business Economics, 7(5), 389–407. doi:10.1007/BF01302739.
Reynolds, P. D., Storey, D., & Westhead, P. (1994). Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional Studies, 28(4), 443–456.
Robinson, W. (1950). Ecological correlations and behaviour of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.
Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4(04), 2120–2167. doi:10.1016/S0169-7218(04)07049-2.
Samuelsson, M., & Davidsson, P. (2009). Does venture opportunity variation matter? Investigating systematic process differences between innovative and imitative new ventures. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 229–255. doi:10.1007/s11187-007-9093-7.
Sánchez-Escobedo, M. D. L. C., Díaz-Casero, J. C., Hernández-Mogollón, R., & Postigo-Jiménez, M. V. (2011). Perceptions and attitudes towards entrepreneurship. An analysis of gender among university students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(4), 443–463. doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0200-5.
Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Shepherd, D. A. (2011). Multilevel entrepreneurship research: Opportunities for studying entrepreneurial decision making. Journal of Management, 37(2), 412–420. doi:10.1177/0149206310369940.
Shepherd, D. A., McMullen, J. S., & Jennings, P. D. (2007). The formation of opportunity beliefs: Overcoming ignorance and reducing doubt. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 75–95. doi:10.1002/sej.3.
Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management,. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12116.
Sieger, P., Fueglistaller, U., & Zellweger, T. (2011). Entrepreneurial Intentions and activities of students across the world. International report of the GUESSS Project 2011. St. Gallen.
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2004). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multi-level modeling (5th ed.). London: Sage.
Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566–591. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002.
Stam, E. (2009). Why butterflies don’t leave: Locational behavior of entrepreneurial firms. Economic Geography, 83(1), 27–50. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2007.tb00332.x.
Sternberg, R. (2009). Regional dimensions of entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5(4), 211–340. doi:10.1561/0300000024.
Sternberg, R., & Wagner, J. (2005). Zur Evidenz regionaler Determinanten im Kontext individueller Grundungsaktivitaten. Empirische Befunde aus dem Regionalen Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM). Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 49(3/4), 167.
Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97–144.
Stuetzer, M., Obschonka, M., Brixy, U., Sternberg, R., & Cantner, U. (2014). Regional characteristics, opportunity perception and entrepreneurial activities. Small Business Economics, 42(2), 221–244. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9488-6.
Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., & Debackere, K. (2011). Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy, 40(4), 553–564. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.001.
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175.
Wagner, J., & Sternberg, R. (2004). Start-up activities, individual characteristics, and the regional milieu: Lessons for entrepreneurship support policies from German micro data. The Annals of Regional Science, 38(2), 219–240. doi:10.1007/s00168-004-0193-x.
Walter, S. G., Parboteeah, K. P., & Walter, A. (2013). University departments and self-employment intentions of business students: A cross-level analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 175–200. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00460.x.
Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship-conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x.
Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., & Wright, M. (2011). The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1128–1143. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.014.
Wood, M. S., McKelvie, A., & Haynie, J. M. (2014). Making it personal: Opportunity individuation and the shaping of opportunity beliefs. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(2), 252–272. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.02.001.
Zellweger, T., Sieger, P., & Halter, F. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 521–536. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.04.001.
Acknowledgments
Previous versions of this paper were presented at the 2013 Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, the ICSB 2014 World Conference and the 2014 Academy of Management Annual Meeting. We thank Philipp Sieger and Denis Grégoire for comments on earlier versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bergmann, H., Hundt, C. & Sternberg, R. What makes student entrepreneurs? On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups. Small Bus Econ 47, 53–76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9700-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9700-6
Keywords
- University entrepreneurship
- Students
- Regional context
- Organizational context
- Multi-level analysis
- Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students’ Survey (GUESSS)