Abstract
We investigated US college students’ gender-typed attitudes about occupations for themselves as a predictor of their real-world decisions regarding an academic major and intended future career. We also investigated US college students’ attitudes about the appropriateness of gender-typed occupations for other men and women. The sample (N = 264) was mostly Caucasian and was drawn from a large state university in the Mid-Atlantic region of the US. An established self-report measure (see Liben and Bigler 2002) was used to assess attitudes about occupations for the self and other people. Gender-typed majors and intended careers were categorized using a coding scheme that was developed for the study. College students preferred gender-stereotypical occupations for themselves. Women’s, but not men’s, preferences for gender-typed occupations predicted their decisions about their academic major and the career they intended to pursue. Both men and women reported that men should only hold masculine occupations, but that women should hold both masculine and feminine occupations. We discuss the implications of our results for understanding the gender gap in occupations in the US, such as the underrepresentation of women in STEM careers and barriers for men in stereotypically female occupations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpert, D., & Breen, D. (1989). ‘Liberality’ in children and adolescents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 154–160. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(89)90011-0.
Archer, J., & Lloyd, B. (1985). Sex and gender. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Arnett, J. J. (2002). The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist, 57, 774–783. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.57.10.774.
Bernstein, B. L., & Russo, N. F. (2008). Explaining too few women in STEM careers: A psychosocial perspective. In M. Paludi (Ed.), The psychology of women at work: Challenges and solutions for our female workforce (Vol. 2, pp. 1–33). Westport: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
Blickenstaff, J. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender & Education, 17, 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072.
Bowerman, B. L., & O’Connell, R. T. (1990). Linear statistical models: An applied approach. Boston: PWS-Kent Pub. Co.
Bradley, K. (2000). The incorporation of women into higher education: Paradoxical outcomes? The Sociology of Education, 73, 1–18. doi:10.2307/2673196.
Brown, C. S., & Leaper, C. (2010). Latina and European American girls’ experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescence. Sex Roles, 63, 860–870. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9856-5.
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3157–3162. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108.
Charles, M. (1992). Cross-national variation in occupational sex segregation. American Sociological Review, 57, 483–502. doi:10.2307/2096096.
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2002). Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review, 67, 573–599. doi:10.2307/3088946.
Cheryan, S., & Plaut, V. C. (2010). Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest. Sex Roles, 63, 475–488. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9835-x.
Dickson, L. (2010). Race and gender differences in college major choice. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 627, 108–124. doi:10.1177/0002716209348747.
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E., Johnston, A., & Clark, E. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21, 1051–1057. doi:10.1177/0956797610377342.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. H. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00781.x.
Eccles, J. S. (1999). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 195–201. doi:10.1177/0165025411398185.
England, P., & Li, S. (2006). Desegregation stalled: The changing gender composition of college majors, 1971–2002. Gender & Society, 20, 657–677. doi:10.1177/0891243206290753.
Erikson, E. H. (1989). Elements of a psychoanalytic theory of psychosocial development. In S. I. Greenspan & G. H. Pollock (Eds.), The course of life, Vol. 1: Infancy (pp. 15–83). Madison: International Universities.
Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G. C., & Kloosterman, P. (2004). New perspectives on the gender stereotyping of mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 389–420. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0604_2.
Glass, C., & Minnotte, K. (2010). Recruiting and hiring women in STEM fields. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3, 218–229. doi:10.1037/a0020581.
Gorman, E. (2005). Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. American Sociological Review, 70, 702–728. doi:10.1177/000312240507000408.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 546–579. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.545.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
Hegewisch, A., Liepmann, H., Hayes, J., & Hartmann, H. (2010). Separate and not equal? Gender segregation in the labor market and the gender wage gap. Briefing paper from The Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR). Retrieved from http://www.iwpr.org/
Holmes, M. A., & O’Connell, S. (2007). Leaks in the pipeline: Why do women remain curiously absent from the ranks of academia? Nature, 446, 346. doi:10.1038/nj7133-346a.
Hussar, W. J., & Bailey, T. M. (2011). Projections of education statistics to 2019. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011017.pdf
Judd, P., & Oswald, P. (1997). Employment desirability: The interactive effects of gender-typed profile, stimulus sex, and gender-typed occupation. Sex Roles, 37, 467–476. doi:10.1023/A:1025669801166.
Kinsella, K., & He, W. (2009). An aging world: 2008 (International Population Reports). Washington, DC: National Institute on Aging, Census Bureau.
Kriedberg, G., Butcher, A., & White, K. (1978). Vocational role choice in second- and sixth-grade children. Sex Roles, 4, 175–181. doi:10.1007/BF00287498.
Lapan, R. T., Shaughnessy, P., & Boggs, K. (1996). Efficacy expectations and vocational interests as mediators between sex and choice of math/science college majors: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 277–291. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.0044.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.
Li, Q. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: A review. Educational Research, 41, 63–76. doi:10.1080/0013188990410106.
Liben, L., & Bigler, R. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67 (2, Serial No. 269). doi:10.1111/15405834.t01-1-00187
Lips, H. M. (2003). The gender pay gap: Concrete indicator of women’s progress toward equality. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3, 87–109. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00016.x.
Looft, W. (1971). Sex differences in the expression of vocational aspirations by elementary school children. Developmental Psychology, 5, 366–366. doi:10.1037/h0031432.
Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge: Belknap.
Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex-typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1184. doi:10.2307/1129498.
Mason, M. A., & Goulden, M. (2004). Marriage and baby blues: Redefining gender equity in the academy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 596, 86–103. doi:10.1177/0002716204268744.
McCormick, C. M., Kuo, S., & Masten, A. S. (2011). Developmental tasks across the life span. In K. L. Fingerman, C. A. Berg, J. Smith, & T. C. Antonucci (Eds.), Handbook of life-span development (pp. 117–139). New York: Springer Publishing Co.
Meece, J. (2006). Trends in women’s employment in the 21st century. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 297–303. doi:10.1080/13803610600765539.
Messersmith, E. E., Garrett, J. L., Davis-Kean, P. E., Malanchuk, O., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Career development from adolescence through emerging adulthood: Insights from information technology occupations. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 206–227. doi:10.1177/0743558407310723.
National Bureau of Economic Research. (2008). Determination of the December 2007 peak in economic activity. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/cycles/dec2008.html
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Digest of education statistics: 2010. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/
National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls & women: 2004. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2005016
National Science Foundation (2008). S & e degrees 1966–2008. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf11316/
O’Brien, M., Peyton, V., Mistry, R., Hruda, L., Jacobs, A., Caldera, Y., … Roy, C. (2000). Gender-role cognition in three-year-old boys and girls. Sex Roles, 42, 1007–1025. doi:10.1023/A:1007036600980
Oswald, D. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes and women’s reports of liking and ability in traditionally masculine and feminine occupations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 196–203. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00424.x.
Reskin, B. (1993). Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 241–270. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.19.080193.001325.
Roos, P. A., & Gatta, M. (1999). The gender gap in earnings: Trends, explanations, and prospects. In G. N. Powell & G. N. Powell (Eds.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 95–123). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Schope, R., & Eliason, M. (2004). Sissies and tomboys: Gender role behaviors and homophobia. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services: Issues in Practice, Policy & Research, 16, 73–97. doi:10.1300/J041v16n02_05.
Siegel, C. (1973). Sex differences in the occupational choices of second graders. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 3, 15–19. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(73)90040-7.
Stewart, A., & Healy, J. M. (1989). Linking individual development and social changes. American Psychologist, 44, 30–42. doi:10.1080/13576500701381630.
Stout, J., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. doi:10.1037/a0021385.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Employment and earnings online. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/ee/home.htm and http://www.bls.gov/cps/home.htm
Wall, H. (2009). The “man-cession” of 2008–2009: It’s big, but it’s not great. The Regional Economist, 18(4), 4–9.
Weisgram, E., Dinella, L., & Fulcher, M. (2011). The role of masculinity/femininity, values, and occupational value affordances in shaping young men’s and women’s occupational choices. Sex Roles, 65, 243–258. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9998-0.
Wilson, K., & Boldizar, J. (1990). Gender segregation in higher education: Effects of aspirations, mathematics achievement, and income. Sociology of Education, 63, 62–74. doi:10.2307/2112897.
Wolfe, L., & Betz, N. (1981). Traditionality of choice and sex-role identification as moderators of the congruence of occupational choice in college women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 43–55. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(81)90028-2.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the members of the Master’s thesis committee, Dr. Katherine Karraker and Dr. Kevin Larkin. Additional thanks to Stephanie Kincaid, Alyssa Fairhurst, Zac Corathers, Meggie Swisher, and Matt Basil for their assistance with this project. We thank Emily Keener for her comments on a previous version of this manuscript.
This manuscript is based on a thesis conducted by the first author under the supervision of the second author in partial fulfillment of the degree of master of science at West Virginia University. An earlier version of this manuscript was presented at the April 2010 Gender Development Research Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DiDonato, L., Strough, J. Do College Students’ Gender-typed Attitudes About Occupations Predict Their Real-World Decisions?. Sex Roles 68, 536–549 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0275-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0275-2