Abstract
Young women’s sexuality traditionally has been marked along a gendered moralist continuum of sexual activity, ranging from virtuous (virgins) to licentious (sluts). However, this one-dimensional model cannot easily accommodate substantive changes in the norms that influence girls’ sexualities. Contemporary scholarship generated across the Anglophone West includes many signs that such a shift has occurred, ushered in by the cultural and ideological suffusion of neoliberalism. I enlist interdisciplinary and international evidence of neoliberalism’s influence on constructions of girls’ sexuality to argue that in the U.S., girls are now judged on their adherence not only to gendered moralist norms, but also to a neoliberal script of sexual agency. In addition to reviewing conceptual and empirical grounds for this claim, I consider the multidimensional normative field created by the intersection of this Agency Line with the long-standing Virgin-Slut Continuum. The primacy of agency within neoliberal discourse seems to legitimize women’s sexual autonomy and its subjective nature may permit them some control over their position above the Agency Line. But upon critical inspection it becomes clear that young women remain confined to a prescribed normative space that divides them from one another, compels self-blame, and predicates their worth on cultural appraisals of their sexuality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A statement on abortion by 100 professors of obstetrics: 40 years later. (2013). American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 209, 193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.007.
Abbott, D. A., & Dalla, R. L. (2008). “It’s a choice, simple as that”: Youth reasoning for sexual abstinence or activity. Journal of Youth Studies, 11, 629–649. doi:10.1080/13676260802225751.
Adam, B. D. (2005). Constructing the neoliberal sexual actor: Responsibility and care of the self in the discourse of barebackers. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 7, 333–346. doi:10.1080/13691050500100773.
Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & England, P. (2010). Is hooking up bad for young women? Contexts, 9, 22–27. doi:10.1525/ctx.2010.9.3.22.
Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L. T., Armstrong, E. M., & Seeley, J. L. (2014). “Good girls”: Gender, social class, and slut discourse on campus. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 100–122. doi:10.1177/0190272514521220.
Attwood, F. (2007). Sluts and Riot Grrrls: Female identity and sexual agency. Journal of Gender Studies, 16, 233–247. doi:10.1080/09589230701562921.
Averett, S., Corman, H., & Reichman, N. E. (2013). Effects of overweight on risky sexual behavior of adolescent girls. Economic Inquiry, 51, 605–619. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00396.x.
Baker, J. (2010). Claiming volition and evading victimhood: Post-feminist obligations for young women. Feminism and Psychology, 20, 186–204. doi:10.1177/0959353509359142.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175.
Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2012). Recovering empowerment: De-personalizing and re-politicizing adolescent female sexuality. Sex Roles, 66, 713–717. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0070-x.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Eliseo-Arras, R. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 386–397. doi:10.1080/00224490802398381.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Fava, N. M. (2014). What puts “at-risk girls” at risk? Sexual vulnerability and social inequality in the lives of girls in the child welfare system. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11, 116–125. doi:10.1007/s13178-013-0142-5.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Livingston, J. A., & Fava, N. M. (2011). Adolescent girls’ assessment and management of sexual risks: Insights from focus group research. Youth and Society, 43, 1167–1193. doi:10.1177/0044118X10384475.
Bernstein, J. (2013). The pro-Miley backlash. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/03/fashion/the-pro-miley-backlash.html.
Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bozymowski, P. (2013). Miley: The movement [Television broadcast]. New York: MTV.
Brown, W. (2003). Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory & Event, 7. doi: 10.1353/tae.2003.0020.
Brown, W. (2006). American nightmare: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization. Political Theory, 34, 690–714. doi:10.1177/0090591706293016.
Brumberg, J. J. (1997). The body project: An intimate history of American girls. New York: Random House.
Burns, A., & Torre, M. E. (2004). Shifting desires: Discourses of accountability in abstinence-only education in the United States. In A. Harris (Ed.), All about the girl: Culture, power, and identity (pp. 127–137). New York: Routledge.
Carpenter, L. M. (2005). Virginity lost: An intimate portrait of first sexual experiences. New York: NYU Press.
Cawley, J., Joyner, K., & Sobal, J. (2006). Size matters: The influence of adolescents’ weight and height on dating and sex. Rationality and Society, 18, 67–94. doi:10.1177/1043463106060153.
Charles, C. E. (2010). Complicating hetero‐femininities: Young women, sexualities and “girl power” at school. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 33–47. doi:10.1080/09518390903447135.
Cheng, A. Y., & Landale, N. S. (2011). Adolescent overweight, social relationships and the transition to first sex: Gender and racial variations. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 43, 6–15. doi:10.1363/4300611.
Claxton, S. E., & van Dulmen, M. H. M. (2013). Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 138–150. doi:10.1177/2167696813487181.
Collins, S. (2014). I shouldn’t need an excuse to be a virgin [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.xojane.com/sex/i-shouldnt-need-an-excuse-to-be-a-virgin.
D’Emilio, J., & Freedman, E. B. (1988). Intimate matters: A history of sexuality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Does feminism have a problem with virginity? [Blog post]. (2014). Retrieved from http://vagendamagazine.com/2014/01/does-feminism-have-a-problem-with-virginity/.
Donnelly, D., Burgess, E., Anderson, S., Davis, R., & Dillard, J. (2001). Involuntary celibacy: A life course analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 159–169. doi:10.1080/00224490109552083.
Duggan, L. (2003). The twilight of equality?: Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Boston: Beacon.
Edwards, K. M., Turchik, J. A., Dardis, C. M., Reynolds, N., & Gidycz, C. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761–773. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2.
Evans, A., & Riley, S. (2014). Technologies of sexiness: Sex, identity, and consumer culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2007). The politics of teen women’s sexuality: Public policy and the adolescent female body. Emory Law Journal, 56, 993–1038.
Fiske, S. T. (2013). Varieties of (de)humanization: Divided by competition and status. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and (de)humanization (pp. 53–71). New York: Springer.
Fortenberry, J. D. (2014). Sexual learning, sexual experience, and healthy adolescent sex. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2014, 71–86. doi:10.1002/cad.20061.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.
Friedman, J., & Valenti, J. (2008). Yes means yes: Visions of sexual power and a world without rape. Berkeley: Seal Press.
Froyum, C. M. (2010). Making “good girls”: Sexual agency in the sexuality education of low-income black girls. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12, 59–72. doi:10.1080/13691050903272583.
Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex?: The cultural scaffolding of rape. New York: Routledge.
Gavey, N. (2012). Beyond “empowerment”? Sexuality in a sexist world. Sex Roles, 66, 718–724. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0069-3.
Gill, R. (2008). Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity, 25, 432–445. doi:10.1057/sub.2008.28.
Gonick, M. (2006). Between “girl power” and “Reviving Ophelia”: Constituting the neoliberal girl subject. NWSA Journal, 18, 1–23. doi:10.1353/nwsa.2006.0031.
Goodkind, S. (2009). “You can be anything you want, but you have to believe it”: Commercialized feminism in gender‐specific programs for girls. Signs, 34, 397–422. doi:10.1086/591086.
Gutiérrez, L. M. (1994). Beyond coping: An empowerment perspective on stressful life events. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 21, 201.
Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender and Society, 23, 589–616. doi:10.1177/0891243209345829.
Harris, A. (2004). Future girl: Young women in the twenty-first century. New York: Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Haydon, A. A., Cheng, M. M., Herring, A. H., McRee, A., & Halpern, C. T. (2014). Prevalence and predictors of sexual inexperience in adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 221–230. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0164-3.
Hensel, D. J., Fortenberry, J. D., O’Sullivan, L. F., & Orr, D. P. (2011). The developmental association of sexual self-concept with sexual behavior among adolescent women. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 675–684. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.09.005.
Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). Sexual behavior in the United States: Results from a national probability sample of men and women ages 14–94. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 255–265. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02012.x.
Hlavka, H. R. (2014). Normalizing sexual violence: Young women account for harassment and abuse. Gender and Society, 28, 337–358. doi:10.1177/0891243214526468.
Humphreys, T. P. (2013). Cognitive frameworks of virginity and first intercourse. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 664–675. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.677868.
Jackson, S. M., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women’s talk about heterosexuality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 113–127. doi:10.1348/014466603763276153.
Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2006). Growth following adversity: Theoretical perspectives and implications for clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 1041–1053. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.12.006.
Kagel, T. S. (2013). In defense of Miley Cyrus’ VMA performance. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tamara-shayne-kagel/defense-of-miley-cyrus-vmas_b_3824923.html.
Kahn, A. S., & Mathie, V. A. (2000). Understanding the unacknowledged rape victim. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 377–403). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Kelly, P. (2001). Youth at risk: Processes of individualisation and responsibilisation in the risk society. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 22, 23–33. doi:10.1080/01596300120039731.
Kindlon, D. (2006). Alpha girls: Understanding the new American girl and how she is changing the world. New York: Rodale.
Lamb, S. (1999). New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept. New York: NYU Press.
Lamb, S. (2010). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, 62, 294–306. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9698-1.
Lamb, S., & Peterson, Z. D. (2012). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, 66, 703–712. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9995-3.
Lamb, S., Graling, K., & Wheeler, E. E. (2013). “Pole-arized” discourse: An analysis of responses to Miley Cyrus’s teen choice awards pole dance. Feminism and Psychology, 23, 163–183. doi:10.1177/0959353512472482.
Lerum, K., & Dworkin, S. L. (2009). “Bad girls rule”: An interdisciplinary feminist commentary on the report of the APA task force on the Sexualization of girls. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 250–263. doi:10.1080/00224490903079542.
Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Free Press.
Lindholm, E. (2013). Emily is a virgin [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://surgegettysburg.wordpress.com/2013/09/16/emily-is-a-virgin/.
Littleton, H., Axsom, D., & Grills-Taquechel, A. (2009). Sexual assault victims’ acknowledgment status and revictimization risk. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 34–42. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01472.x.
Livingston, J. A., Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Hequembourg, A. L., Testa, M., & Downs, J. S. (2013). Mixed drinks and mixed messages: Adolescent girls’ perspectives on alcohol and sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 38–50. doi:10.1177/0361684312464202.
Luker, K. (1996). Dubious conceptions: The politics of teenage pregnancy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lyons, H., Giordano, P. C., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Identity, peer relationships, and adolescent girls’ sexual behavior: An exploration of the contemporary double standard. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 437–449. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.506679.
Malone, M. M. (2013). The virgin feminist [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://feministsatlarge.wordpress.com/2013/03/31/the-virgin-feminist/.
Mardorossian, C. M. (2002). Toward a new feminist theory of rape. Signs, 27, 743–775. doi:10.1086/337938.
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5.
Martin, K. A. (1996). Puberty, sexuality, and the self: Girls and boys at adolescence. New York: Routledge.
Martin, S. (2013). Evette Holyfield talks abstinence and empowerment. Ebony. Retrieved from http://www.ebony.com/entertainment-culture/evette-holyfield-talks-abstinence-and-empowerment-103#axzz346Lp20aH.
Martin, K. A., & Luke, K. (2010). Gender differences in the ABC’s of the birds and the bees: What mothers teach young children about sexuality and reproduction. Sex Roles, 62, 278–291. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9731-4.
Maxwell, C. (2006). Understanding young women’s sexual relationship experiences: The nature and role of vulnerability. Journal of Youth Studies, 9, 141–158. doi:10.1080/13676260600635615.
McRobbie, A. (2008). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture, and social change. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Miller, A. K., Canales, E. J., Amacker, A. M., Backstrom, T. L., & Gidycz, C. A. (2011). Stigma-threat motivated nondisclosure of sexual assault and sexual revictimization: A prospective analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 119–128. doi:10.1177/0361684310384104.
Morokoff, P. J. (2000). A cultural context for sexual assertiveness in women. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 299–319). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2013). “I'd rather be a famous fashion model than a famous scientist”: The rewards and costs of internalizing sexualization. In E. L. Zurbriggen & T. Roberts (Eds.), The sexualization of girls and girlhood: Causes, consequences, and resistance (pp. 235–256). New York: Oxford.
Noland, V. J., Daley, E. M., Drolet, J. C., Fetro, J. V., Brown, K. R. M., Hassell, C. D., & McDermott, R. J. (2004). Connotative interpretations of sexuality-related terms. Sex Roles, 51, 523–534. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-5462-8.
Odem, M. E. (1995). Delinquent daughters: Protecting and policing adolescent female sexuality in the United States, 1885–1920. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Patrick, M. E., Maggs, J. L., & Abar, C. C. (2007). Reasons to have sex, personal goals, and sexual behavior during the transition to college. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 240–249. doi:10.1080/00224490701443759.
Patterson, R. (2008). Students of virginity. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/30/magazine/30Chastity-t.html?pagewanted=print&_r=0.
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504.
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51, 129–144. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00.
Phillips, L. M. (2000). Flirting with danger: Young women’s reflections on sexuality and domination. New York: NYU Press.
Reid, P. T., & Bing, V. M. (2000). Sexual roles of girls and women: An ethnocultural lifespan perspective. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 141–166). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2012). Slut-shaming, girl power and “sexualisation”: Thinking through the politics of the international SlutWalks with teen girls. Gender and Education, 24, 333–343. doi:10.1080/09540253.2011.645023.
Rubin, G. S. (2011). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In G. S. Rubin (Ed.), Deviations: A Gayle Rubin reader (pp. 137–181). Durham: Duke University Press. (Original work published 1984).
Sanday, P. R. (2007). Fraternity gang rape: Sex, brotherhood, and privilege on campus. New York: New York University Press.
Savani, K., Stephens, N. M., & Markus, H. R. (2011). The unanticipated interpersonal and societal consequences of choice: Victim blaming and reduced support for the public good. Psychological Science, 22, 795–802. doi:10.1177/0956797611407928.
Schalet, A., Hunt, G., & Joe-Laidler, K. (2003). Respectability and autonomy: The articulation and meaning of sexuality among the girls in the gang. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32, 108–143. doi:10.1177/0891241602238940.
Sharper, B. (2009). Bed, bitch, and beyond: Is no sex still sex-positive? [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://bitchmagazine.org/post/is-no-sex-still-sex-positive-2.
Smith, H. (2009). Abstinence, the “sexy” way. Jezebel. Retrieved from http://jezebel.com/5333434/abstinence-the-sexy-way.
Stephens, D. P., & Phillips, L. D. (2003). Freaks, gold diggers, divas, and dykes: The sociohistorical development of adolescent African American women’s sexual scripts. Sexuality and Culture, 7, 3–49. doi:10.1007/BF03159848.
Stringer, R. (2014). Knowing victims: Feminism, agency and victim politics in neoliberal times. New York: Routledge.
Thomson, R. (2000). Dream on: The logic of sexual practice. Journal of Youth Studies, 3, 407–427. doi:10.1080/713684385.
Thrift, S. C. (2014). #YesAllWomen as feminist meme event. Feminist Media Studies, 14, doi: 10.1080/14680777.2014.975421.
Tiefer, L. (2004). Sex is not a natural act and other essays (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tolman, D. L., & McClelland, S. I. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review, 2000–2009. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 242–255. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00726.x.
Travis, C. B., Meginnis, K. L., & Bardari, K. M. (2000). Beauty, sexuality, and identity: The social control of women. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 237–272). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Valenti, J. (2010). The purity myth: How America’s obsession with virginity is hurting young women. Berkeley: Seal Press.
Wilke, J., & Saad, L. (2013). Older Americans’ moral attitudes changing: Moral acceptance of teenage sex among the biggest generational divides. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/162881/older-americans-moral-attitudes-changing.aspx.
Acknowledgments
This work has been presented at: the University at Buffalo’s Buffalo Center for Social Research (March, 2014); the Society for Research on Adolescence Biennial Meeting in Austin, TX (March, 2014); and the University of Pittsburgh Gender, Sexuality, & Women’s Studies Program (November, 2014). I thank J. Dennis Fortenberry and anonymous reviewers for their careful feedback on preliminary drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bay-Cheng, L.Y. The Agency Line: A Neoliberal Metric for Appraising Young Women’s Sexuality. Sex Roles 73, 279–291 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6