Abstract
Using a national district-level dataset of India composed of information on investments in primary schooling [data from the District Information Survey for Education (DISE, 2007/8)] and information on demographic characteristics of elected officials [data from the Election Commission of India (ECI, 2000/04)], we examined the relationship between women’s representation in State Legislative Assembly (SLA) seats and district-level investments in primary schooling. We used OLS regressions adjusting for confounders and spatial autocorrelation, and estimated separate models for North and South India. Women’s representation in general SLA seats typically was negatively associated with investments in primary-school amenities and teachers; women’s representation in SLA seats reserved for under-represented minorities, i.e., scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, typically was positively associated with investments in primary schooling, especially in areas addressing the basic needs of poor children. Women legislators’ gender and caste identities may shape their decisions about redistributive educational policies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Redistributive policy refers to measures paid by one group to grant goods and services to other, relatively disadvantaged groups.
The Indian government recognizes scheduled tribes, scheduled castes (Shudras), other “backward” (occupational) castes and “general” castes (Brahaman, Kshatriya, Vaishayas). The first three groups are defined as socially and economically disadvantaged and deserving of special protections.
The States are Assam, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and West Bengal. The UTs are Chandigarh, Delhi, Pondicherry and Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
Clots-Figueras (2011) finds that, in India, SC/ST women legislators have a strong effect on primary schools and general women legislators have a strong effect on middle schools.
For SC/ST officials, investment in the number of primary schools has been positive where the SC/ST population has been concentrated Crost and Kambhampati (2010). Also, the effects of political reservation for SC have differed from those for ST, with the latter more aligned with concerns of the poor (Chin and Prakash 2011; Pande 2003).
EGS are established in habitations where no formal school exists within 1 km and at least 15–25 children 6–14 years are out of school. Alternative learning centers serve deprived (e.g., street, migrating) children (National Portal Content Management Team 2009).
The DISE also collects data on grants to schools, incentives per 100 enrolled pupils, and pupils, including enrollment, exam results, and grade-specific promotion, repetition, and drop-out.
Para-teachers are full-time employees but need not be professionally qualified as teachers and are paid at a lower rate than full-time teachers.
In India, scheduled caste is further subdivided into many sub groups. Since the ECI collects data on membership in the scheduled caste, as opposed to a specific denomination within scheduled caste, we treat all scheduled caste women as one.
According to the Handbook for Candidates, an online publication by the Election Commission of India (ECI), both general and SC/ST women are eligible to compete from a general seat. The Handbook for Candidates says, “if you are a candidate for a general seat, that is to say, for a seat not reserved for the Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes as mentioned in the preceding sub-clauses, then you must be an elector for any parliamentary constituency (vide section 4 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951)” (page 10). However, ECI reports on election results do not provide information on caste membership of those who have won general SLA seats (reports provide data on gender, political party, and performance in elections, including absolute and relative number of votes won for seats indicated as reserved or not-reserved for SC/ST). Therefore, in the current analysis, we assumed that women who won general seats in the SLAs during the years for which we have data in this analysis were not SC/ST women. Our assumption is likely to reflect the reality given that, for general SLA seats, non SC/ST candidates are likely to secure party nominations and, ultimately, win elections since the constituencies of the general SLA seats are predominantly non SC/ST. To the best of our knowledge, all prior research on general and SC/ST women legislators made the same assumption (Clots-Figueras 2011; Bhalotraa et al. 2014).
Replacing the squared term with a variable for whether thresholds were reached (12.5, 16.0 %) for women’s district-level representation in SLA seats yielded similar results (available on request).
Pairwise correlations among the explanatory variables were −0.03 to 0.93. Estimated variance inflation factors for these variables were 4.42–7.56, mitigating concerns of collinearity.
Northern districts in India were those, which belonged to the states of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Sikkim, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal. Southern districts were those, which belonged to the states of Andhra Pradesh, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Pondicherry, and Tamil Nadu.
References
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender and Society, 20(4), 441–464.
Anandhi, S. (1991). Women’s question in the Dravidian Movement c. 1925–1948. Social Scientist, 19(5/6), 24–41.
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Boston, M.A.: Kluwer Academic.
Ban, R., & Rao, V. (2008). Tokenism or agency? The impact of women’s reservations on village democracies in south India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 56(3), 501–530.
Banerjee, A., & Iyer, L. (2005). History, institutions, and economic performance: The legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1190–1213.
Banerjee, A., Somanathan, R., & Pande, R. (2007). The political economy of public goods: Some evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics, 82, 287–314.
Bardhan, P. (1996). Efficiency, equity and poverty alleviation: Policy issues in less developed countries. The Economic Journal, 106(438), 1344–1356.
Barrett, E. J. (1995). The policy priorities of African American women in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20(2), 223–247.
Baviskar, B. S. (2005). Impact of women’s participation in local governance in rural India. In L. C. Jain (Ed.), Decentralization and local governance (pp. 329–342). New Delhi: Longman.
Besley, T., & Coate, S. (1997). An economic model of representative democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(11), 85–114.
Besley, T., Pande, R., & Rao, V. (2004). The politics of public good provision: Evidence from Indian local governments. Journal of the European Economics Association Papers and Proceedings, 2(2–3), 416–426.
Bester, A. C., Conley, T. G., & Hansen, C. B. (2011). Inference with dependent data using cluster covariance estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 165(2), 137–151.
Bhalotra, S., Clots-Figueras, I., Cassan, G., & Iyer, L. (2014). Religion, politician identity and development outcomes: Evidence from India. Journal of Public Economics, 104, 4–17.
Beteille, A. (1969). Social inequality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bolzendahl, C. (2011). Beyond the big picture: gender influences on disaggregated and domain-specific measures of social spending, 1980–1999. Politics and Gender, 7, 35–70.
Bonu, S., Rani, M., Peters, D. H., & Baker, T. D. (2011). Empowering the socially excluded in rural local governments: An exploratory study from a State in India. Journal of International Development, 23, 42–62.
Bose, S. B., & Singh, V. B. (1988a). State elections in India: Data handbook on Vidhan Sabha elections 1952-85: The East and Northeast. London: Sage.
Bose, S. B., & Singh, V. B. (1988b). State elections in India: Data handbook on Vidhan Sabha Elections 1952-85: The North Part II. London: Sage.
Bose, S. B., & Singh, V. B. (1988c). State elections in India: Data handbook on Vidhan Sabha elections 1952-85: The South. London: Sage.
Bose, S. B., & Singh, V. B. (2000a). State elections in India: Data handbook on Vidhan Sabha Elections 1952-85: The North Part I. London: Sage.
Bose, S. B., & Singh, V. B. (2000b). State elections in India: Data handbook on Vidhan Sabha elections 1952-85: The West. London: Sage.
Bratton, K. A., & Ray, L. P. (2002). Descriptive Representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 428–437.
Census of India. 2011. www.censusindia.net
Chattopadhyay, R., & Duflo, E. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443.
Chin, A., & Prakash, N. (2011). The redistributive effects of political reservation for minorities: Evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics, 96, 265–277.
Clots-Figueras, I. (2007). Are Female Leaders Good for Education? Evidence from India. Working Paper 07-73 Economics Series 42, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
Clots-Figueras, I. (2011). Women in Politics: Evidence from the Indian states. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 664–690.
Coffé, H., & Bolzendahl, C. (2010). Same game, different rules? Gender differences in political participation. Sex Roles, 62(5–6), 318–333.
Conley, T. (1996). Econometric Modeling of Cross-Sectional Dependence. Dissertation, University of Chicago.
Conley, T. (1999). GMM estimation with cross-sectional dependence. Journal of Econometrics, 92, 1–45.
Constitution of India. (1949). Parts V and VI. http://india.gov.in/govt/constitutions_of_india.php
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
Crost, B., & Kambhampati, U. S. (2010). Political market characteristics and the provision of educational infrastructure in North India. World Development, 38(2), 195–204.
Delaney, L., & O’Toole, F. (2008). Individual, household and gender preferences for social transfers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(3), 348–359.
Deshpande, A. (2007). Overlapping identities under liberalization: Gender and caste in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55(4), 735–760.
Diamond, I. (1977). Sex roles in the State House. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (1995). India economic development and social opportunity. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2002). India: Development and participation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Duflo, E. (2003). Grandmothers and Granddaughters: Old age pension and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review, 17(1), 1–25.
Dye, T. R. (1966). Politics, economics and the public: Policy outcomes in the American States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Dye, T. R. (1969). Income inequality and American state politics. The American Political Science Review, 63(1), 157–162.
Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On Kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60.
Echávarri, R. A., & Ezcurra, R. (2010). Education and gender bias in the sex ratio at birth: Evidence from India. Demography, 47(1), 249–268.
Edlund, L., Haider, L., & Pande, R. (2005). Unmarried parenthood and redistributive politics. Journal of European Economic Association, 3(1), 95–119.
Edlund, L., & Pande, R. (2001). Why Have women become left-wing? The political gender gap and the decline in marriage. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 917–961.
Franceschet, S., & Piscopo, J. M. (2008). Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics and Gender, 4, 393–425.
Franke, R. W., & Chasin, B. H. (1994). Kerala: Radical reform as development in an Indian State. Oregon, USA: Food First Books.
Frederick, A. H. (2010). Practicing electoral politics in the cracks: Intersectional consciousness in a Latina Candidate’s City Council Campaign. Gender and Society, 24, 475–498.
Fürer-Haimendorf, C. V. (1982). Tribes of India: The struggle for survival. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Galanter, M. (1984). Competing equalities. Law and the backward classes in India. Berkley: University of California Press.
Garcia, D. M., Desmarais, S., Branscombe, N. R., & Gee, S. S. (2005). Opposition to redistributive employment policies for women: The role of policy experience and group interest. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 583–602.
Gotell, L., & Brodie, J. (1996). Women and the parties in the 1990s: Less than ever an issue of numbers. In H. G. Thornburn (Ed.), Party politics in Canada (7th ed., pp. 54–71). Scarborough: Prentice Hall.
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361–396.
Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.
Hannaway, J., & Woodroffe, N. (2003). Policy instruments in education. Review of Research in Education, 27, 1–24.
Hill Collins, P. (2000). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. In U. Narayan & S. Harding (Eds.), Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist World (pp. 156–176). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hughes, M. M., & Paxton, P. (2008). Continuous change, episodes, and critical periods: A framework for understanding women’s political representation over Time. Politics and Gender, 4, 233–264.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). (1995). National Family Health Survey (MCH and Family Planning), India 1992–93. Bombay: IIPS.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. (2000). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998-99: India. Mumbai: IIPS.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) 2005-06: India. Mumbai: IIPS.
India Development Gateway. (2009). Primary Education. Right to Education. http://www.indg.in/primary-education/policiesandschemes/right-to-education-bill
Jadhav, M. H. (1986). Anti-caste movement in Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly, 21, 740–742.
Jeffrey, R., & Basu, A. M. (1996). Girls’ schooling, women’s autonomy and fertility change in South Asia. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Jenkins, L. D. (1999). Competing inequalities: The Struggle over reserved legislative seats for women in India. International Review of Social History, 44(Supplement), 53–75.
Kenworthy, L., & Malami, M. (1999). Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces, 78(1), 235–268.
Kumar, H., & Somanathan, R. (2009). Mapping Indian Districts Across Census Year, 1971-2001. Working Paper No. 176. Centre for Development Economics Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
Kunovich, S., & Paxton, P. (2005). Pathways to power: The role of political parties in women’s national Political representation. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 505–552.
Library of Congress, Federal Research Division. (2004) Country Profile: India. http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/profiles/India.pdf
Loftin, C., & Ward, S. (1983). A spatial autocorrelation model of the effects of population density on fertility. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 121–128.
Lott, J. R., & Kenny, L. W. (1999). Did women’s suffrage change the size and scope of government? Journal of Political Economy, 107, 77–95.
Lundberg, S., Pollak, R. A., & Wales, T. J. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources?: Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit. Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 463–480.
Malhotra, A., & Schuler, S. R. (2005). Women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. In D. Narayan (Ed.), Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 71–88). Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800.
McLendon, M. K., Heller, D. E., & Young, S. P. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(4), 363–400.
Meenakshisundaram, S. S. (2005). Rural development for Panchayati Raj. In L. C. Jain (Ed.), Decentralisation and local governance (pp. 417–433). New Delhi: Longman.
Mehrotra, S. K. (2006). Reforming elementary education in India: A menu of options. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(3), 261–277.
Meyer, J. W., Tyack, D., Nagel, J., & Gordon, A. (1979). Public Education as Nation-building in America: Enrollments and bureaucratization in the American States, 1870–1930. The American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 591–613.
Miller, B. D. (1989). Changing patterns of juvenile sex rations in rural India, 1961 to 1971. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(22), 1229–1236.
Miller, G. (2008). Women’s suffrage, political responsiveness, and child survival in American history. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(3), 1287–1327.
Mishra, R. C. (2000). Role of women in legislatures in India: A Study. New Delhi: Anmol Publications.
Moghadam, V. M. (1991). The reproduction of gender inequality In Muslim societies—A case-study Of Iran in the 1980s. World Development, 19(10), 1335–1349.
Mohanty, B. (1995). Panchayati Raj, 73rd Constitutional Amendment and Women. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(52), 3346–3350.
Munshi, K., & Rosenzweig, M. (2008). The efficacy of parochial politics: caste, commitment, and competence in Indian local governments. Working Paper No. 14335. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Murthi, M., Guio, A. C., & Drèze, J. (1995). Mortality, Fertility, and Gender Bias in India: A District-Level Analysis. Population and Development Review, 21(4), 745–782.
National Portal Content Management Team. (2009). Education Guarantee Scheme and Alternative and Innovative Education. http://india.gov.in/sectors/education/education_guarantee.php
Omvedt, G. (1993). Dalits and the democratic revolution: Dr Ambedkar and the dalit movement in Colonial India. New Delhi: Sage Publishers.
Pal, S., & Ghosh, S. (2008). The Elite and the Marginalised: An Analysis of Public Spending on Mass Education in the Indian States, IZA Discussion Paper No. 3707, Bonn, Institute for the Study of Labor.
Pande, R. (2003). Can mandated political representation increase policy influence for disadvantaged minorities? American Economic Review, 93(4), 1132–1151.
Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Green, J. L. (2006). The international women’s movement and women’s political representation, 1893–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 898–920.
Paxton, P., & Kunovich, S. (2003). Women’s political representation: The importance of ideology. Social Forces, 82(1), 87–113.
Paxton, P., Kunovich, S., & Hughes, M. M. (2007). Gender in Politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 263–284.
Phillips, A. (1998). The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pundir, J. K., & Singh, P. (2002). Women legislators in UP: Background, emergence and role. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(1), 923–928.
Randall, V. (2006). Legislative gender quotas and Indian exceptionalism: The travails of the women’s reservation bill. Comparative Politics, 39(1), 63–82.
Ratnam, K. Y. (2008). The Dalit Movement and Democratization in Andhra Pradesh. Working Paper 13. East-West Center Washington.
Renzulli, L. A., & Roscigno, V. J. (2005). Charter school policy, implementation, and diffusion across the United States. Sociology of Education, 78, 344–366.
Richter, L. K. (1990). Exploring theories of female leadership in South and Southeast Asia. Pacific Affairs, 63(4), 524–540.
Roy, A., Kamaiah, B., & Rao, M. G. (2000). Educational expenditure of large states—A normative view. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(17), 1465–1469.
Rubalcava, L., Teruel, G., & Thomas, D. (2009). Investments, time preferences, and public transfers paid to women. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57(3), 507–538.
Saidel, J. R., & Loscocco, K. (2005). Agency leaders, gendered institutions, and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 158–170.
Sanyal, K. (2008). Legislative brief: The Constitution (One Hundred and Eighth Amendment) Bill, 2008. PRS Legislative Brief.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2006). Still Supermadres? Gender and the policy priorities of Latin American Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 570–585.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2011). Women who win: Social backgrounds, paths to power, and political ambition in Latin American legislatures. Politics & Gender, 7(1), 1–33.
Sen, A. (2005). The argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian history, culture and identity. New York: Picador.
Srinivas, M. N. (1957). Caste in Modern India. The Journal of Asian Studies, 16(4), 529–548.
Stevenson, L. S. (1999). Gender politics in the Mexican Democratization process: Electing women and legislating sex crimes and affirmative Action, 1988–97. In J. Domínguez & A. Poiré (Eds.), Towards Mexico’s democratization: Parties, campaigns, elections and public opinion (pp. 57–87). New York: Routledge Press.
Stryker, S. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
Svaleryd, H. (2009). Women’s representation and public spending. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(2), 186–198.
Thapar, S. (1993). Women as activists; women as symbols: A Study of the Indian Nationalist Movement. Feminist Review, 44, 81–96.
The Hindu. (2014). Women’s bill: An idea whose time is yet to come in LS. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/womens-bill-an-idea-whose-time-is-yet-to-come-in-ls/article5713978.ece. Retrieved on November 01, 2014.
Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation: an inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources, 25(4), 635–664.
Thomas, S. (1991). The impact of women on state legislative policies. Journal of Politics, 53, 958–976.
Thomas, S. (1994). How women legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, D. (1997). Incomes, expenditures and health outcomes: Evidence on intrahousehold resource allocation. In L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott, & H. Alderman (Eds.), Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Models, methods, and policy (pp. 142–164). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Thomas, S., & Welch, S. (1991). The Impact of gender on activities and priorities of State Legislators. The Western Political Quarterly, 44(2), 445–456.
United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF]. (2011). Using the district information system for education to promote equity in education. Briefing Paper Series: Innovations, lessons, and good practices. New Delhi: UNICEF.
Wängnerud, L. (2002). Testing the politics of presence: Women’s representation in the Swedish Riksdag. Scandanavian Political Studies, 23(1), 67–91.
Wu, K. B., Goldschmidt, P., Boscardin, C. K., & Azam, M. (2007). Girls in India: Poverty, location, and social disparities. In M. Lewis & M. Lockheed (Eds.), Exclusion, gender and education: Case studies from the Developing World (pp. 119–143). Washington, D.C.: Center for Global Development.
Zhou, X. G., Moen, P., & Tuma, N. B. (1998). Educational stratification in urban China: 1949-94. Sociology of Education, 71(3), 199–222.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the assistance of Ms. Rudina Sobvokiak in data preparation and of Ms. Teresa Parker and Ms. Francine Pope in manuscript preparation. We also thank Professor Nancy Folbre, the discussant for Session 167 “Gender in Developing Countries” of the 2010 meeting of the Population Association of America, for comments on a previous version of this manuscript. Any remaining errors are the responsibility of the authors. This analysis was supported by research grant 1R03HD051822-01A2 from the National Institute of Child Health and Development.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halim, N., Yount, K.M., Cunningham, S.A. et al. Women’s Political Empowerment and Investments in Primary Schooling in India. Soc Indic Res 125, 813–851 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0870-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0870-4