Abstract
In this study we extend the socio-ecological concept of two contrasting design principles applicable to all work systems. Reframing those design principles as strategic as well as operational choices leads us to propose a third design principle, Design Principle 3 (DP3), which has remained undeveloped in social ecology. We call this design principle Redundancy of Potentialities and demonstrate its application in transorganizational work systems. We argue that DP3 is at the core of socio-ecological practice and is therefore appropriate for coping with the highly turbulent environments now experienced in many industries and fields. We offer several illustrations of DP3 in practice and draw implications for enhancing capabilities for creative collaboration in inter-organizational fields through deliberate attention to design.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We thank one of the anonymous reviewers for suggesting this addition.
“Open” and “free” fields have expanded much in recent years. Following on the heels of such celebration of open sourcing come critiques from adjacent fields, e.g., “traditional” newspapers whose content—hard-won and expensive—is being pilfered by bloggers, news consolidators like Google, etc. See Anderson (2009). Perhaps this is the dark side of DP3.
Trist (1983a) found referent organizations to be the de facto “rule makers” of fields, not by “hard” law (Medjad) but through “soft” law influences that come to be adopted. Ramírez and Wallin (2000) relabelled them “prime movers”, and analyzed how companies such as Tetra Pak, Visa, Nokia, and Xerox have acted as referent organizations and have been the de facto designers of their respective fields. We use the working term “catalytic organization” rather than a referent organization because it concerns a latent function that comes to be seen by third parties only when it unfolds (Bohm 1996). Nevertheless, the proper relationship between referent organizations and our term remains to be worked out.
References
Ackoff R (1975) Redesigning the future. John Wiley, New York
Ackoff RL (1999) Re-creating the corporation: a design of organizations for the 21st century. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ackoff RL, Emery FE (1972) On purposeful systems. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago
Aldrich H (1999) Organizations evolving. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Anderson C (2009) Free: the future of a radical price. Hyperion, Santa Clara
Babüroğlu O (1988) The vortical environment: the fifth in the Emery–Trist levels of organizational environments. Hum Relat 41:181–210
Babüroğlu O (1992) Tracking the development of the Emery–Trist systems paradigm (ETSP). Syst Pract 5(3):263–290
Barton J, Selsky J (2000) Toward an Emery model of management: implications and prospects of Emery open systems theory. Syst Pract Action Res 13(5):705–720
Barton J, Emery M, Flood R, Selsky J, Wolstenholme E (2004) A maturing of systems thinking? Evidence from three perspectives. Syst Pract Action Res 17(1):3–36
Beck U, Holzer B (2007) Organizations in world risk society. In: Pearson C, Roux-Dufort C, Clair J (eds) International handbook of organizational crisis management. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 3–24
Beyerlein M, Johnson D, Beyerlein S (eds) (2004) Complex collaboration: building the capabilities for working across boundaries, Elsevier
Beyerlein M, Beyerlein S, Kennedy F (eds) (2005) Collaborative capital: creating intangible value, Elsevier
Blois K, Ramírez R (2006) Capabilities as marketable assets: a proposal for a functional categorization. Ind Mark Manage 35(8):1027–1031
Bohm D (1996) On dialogue. Routledge, London
Botsman R, Rogers R (2010) What’s mine is yours: the rise of collaborative consumption. HarperCollins, New York
Brown JS, Duguid P (2000) The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Chesbrough H (2004) Managing open innovation. Res-Technol Manage 47(1):23–26
Clegg S, Pitsis T, Rura-Polley T, Marosszeky M (2002) Governmentality matters: designing an alliance culture of inter-organizational collaboration for managing projects. Organ Stud 23(3):317–337
Cummings T (1984) Transorganizational development. Res Organ Behav 6:367–422
Davis G, Marquis C (2005) Prospects for organization theory in the early 21st century: institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ Sci 16(4):332–343
Demil B, Lecocq X (2006) Neither market nor hierarchy nor network: the emergence of bazaar governance. Organ Stud 27(10):1447–1466
Dougherty D, Dunne D (2011) Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organ Sci 22(5):1214–1223
Dunbar R, Starbuck W (2006) Learning to design organizations and learning from designing them. Organ Sci 17(2):171–178
Emery F (1967) The next thirty years. Hum Relat 20:199–237
Emery F (1969) Introduction. In: Emery F (ed) Systems thinking, vol 1. Penguin, Harmondsworth
Emery F (1976) The second design principle: participation and the democratization of work. Futures we are in. Martinus-Nijhoff. 1976. Reprinted in Trist E and Murray H (eds) (1993) The social engagement of social science, volume 2, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 214–233
Emery F, Trist E (1965) The causal texture of organizational environments. Hum Relat 18:21–32
Emery M (1999) Searching: the theory and practice of making cultural change. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
Emery M (2000) The current version of Emery’s open systems theory. Syst Pract Action Res 13(5):623–641
Feibleman J, Friend J (1969) The structure and function of organizations. In: Emery F (ed) Systems thinking, volume 1. Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp 30–55
Fleming L, Waguespack D (2007) Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ Sci 18(2):165–180
Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510
Greenwood R, Miller D (2010) Tackling design anew: getting back to the heart of organizational theory. Acad Manage Perspect 24(4):78–88
Hargrave T, Van de Ven A (2006) A collective action model of institutional innovation. Acad Manag Rev 31(4):864–888
Hirschhorn L (1984) Beyond mechanization: work and technology in a postindustrial age. MIT Press, Cambridge
Hirschhorn L, Gilmore T (2004) Ideas in philanthropic field building: where they come from and how they are translated into actions. Practice Matters 6, The Foundation Center. http://www.fdncenter.org/for_grantmakers/practice_matters/
Hirschhorn L, Noble P, Rankin T (2001) Sociotechnical systems in an age of mass customization. J Eng Tech Manage 18:241–252
Homer-Dixon T (2006) The upside of down: catastrophe, creativity, and the renewal of civilization. Island Press, Washington
Iansiti M, Levien R (2004) Strategy as ecology. Harvard Bus Rev 82:69–78
Jenson J, Saint-Martin D (2006) Building blocks for a new social architecture: the LEGO™ paradigm of an active society. Policy Politics 34(3):429–451
Keidel R (1990) Triangular design: a new organizational geometry. Acad Manag Exec 4(4):21–37
Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Le Masson P, Weil B, Hatchuel A (2010) Strategic management of design and innovation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lusch R, Vargo S (2006) The service-dominant logic of marketing: dialog, debate, and directions. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk
Marot M, Selsky J, Hart W, Reddy P (2005) Research teams in an Australian biotechnology field: how intellectual property influences collaboration. In: Beyerlein M, Beyerlein S, Kennedy F (eds) Collaborative capital: creating intangible value. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–31
McCann J (1983) Design guidelines for social problem solving interventions. J Appl Behav Sci 19(2):177–189
McCann J, Selsky J (1984) Hyperturbulence and the emergence of type 5 environments. Acad Manag Rev 9(4):460–470
Meyer A, Gaba V, Colwell K (2005) Organizing far from equilibrium: non-linear change in organizational fields. Organ Sci 16(5):456–473
Morgan G (2006) Images of organization, New Edition edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Motamedi K (2012) Trans-organizations: managing in a complex and uncertain world. Graziadio Bus Rev 15(2)
Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(2):242–266
Normann R (2001) Reframing business: when the map changes the landscape. Wiley, New York
Normann R, Ramírez R (1989) A theory of the offering: a step towards a post-industrial business strategy. In: Snow C (ed) Strategy, organization, design, and human resource management. JAI Press, Greenwich
Normann R, Ramírez R (1993) Designing interactive strategy: from value chain to value constellation. Harvard Bus Rev (July–August):65–77
Normann R, Ramírez R (1994) Designing interactive strategy. Wiley, Chichester
Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Paris Club (2006) Fifty years of orderly sovereign debt restructuring. Proceedings of the International Policy Forum, 14 June, Paris
Pascal A, Thomas C, Romme AGL (2012) Developing a human-centred and science-based approach to design: the knowledge management platform project. Br J Manage. doi:10.1111/j.i467-8551.2011.00802.x
Pava C (1983) Managing the new office technology. Free Press, New York
Perlmutter HV (1965) Towards a theory and practice of social architecture: the building of indispensable institutions. Tavistock Publications, London
Porter M (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New York
Powell W, Koput K, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin Sci Q 41:116–145
Ramírez R (1999) Value co-production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strateg Manag J 20(1):49–65
Ramírez R, Selsky J, Van der Heijden K (2010) Conceptual and historical overview. In: Ramírez R, Selsky J, Van der Heijden K (eds) Business planning for turbulent times: new methods for applying scenarios. Earthscan, London, pp 17–30
Ramírez R, van der Heijden K (2007) Scenarios to develop strategic options: a new interactive role for scenarios in strategy. In: Sharpe W, van der Heijden K (eds) Scenarios for success: turning insights into action. Wiley, Chichester, pp 89–120
Ramírez R, Wallin C (2000) Prime movers. Wiley, Chichester
Rivette K, Kline D (1999) Rembrandts in the attic: unlocking the hidden value of patents. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Sawhney M, Prandelli E (2000) Communities of creation: managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. Calif Manage Rev 42(4):24–54
Selsky J, Marot M, Hart W, Reddy P (2005) Building field level collaborative capital: the case of an Australian biotechnology consortium, presented at Academy of Management annual meeting, Honolulu
Selsky J, McCann J (2010) Managing disruptive change and turbulence through continuous change thinking and scenarios. In: Ramírez R, Selsky J, Van der Heijden K (eds) Business planning for turbulent times: new methods for applying scenarios. Earthscan, London, pp 167–186
Selsky J, Goes J, Baburoglu O (2007) Contrasting perspectives of strategy making: applications in ‘hyper’ environments. Organ Stud 28(1):71–94
Simon H (1969) The sciences of the artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Sinha K, Van de Ven A (2005) Designing work within and between organizations. Organ Sci 16(4):389–408
Trist E (1977) A concept of organizational ecology. Aust J Manage 2(2):161–175
Trist E (1983a) Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Hum Relat 36:269–284
Trist E (1983b) Pava’s extension of socio-technical theory to advanced information technologies. Reprinted in Trist E and Murray H (eds) (1993) The social engagement of social science, volume 2. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 662–673
Van de Ven A, Hargrave T (2004) Social, technical, and institutional change. In: Poole MS, Van de Ven A (eds) Handbook of organizational change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 259–303
Vargo S, Lusch R (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Mark 68(1):1–17
Vargo S, Lusch R (2008) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. J Acad Mark Sci 36(1):1–10
Von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the ‘private-collective’ innovation model: issues for organization science. Organ Sci 14(2):209–223
Weber S (2004) The success of open source. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning as a social system. Syst Think 9(5)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A much earlier version of this study was delivered at a symposium on New directions in socio-ecological thinking: Legacies of Emery and Trist, Academy of Management national meetings, Philadelphia, August 2007. The authors thank Don de Guerre, Merrelyn Emery, Del Nagy, Bill Starbuck and participants in a USF Tampa Management Department faculty seminar for comments on earlier versions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Selsky, J.W., Ramírez, R. & Babüroğlu, O.N. Collaborative Capability Design: Redundancy of Potentialities. Syst Pract Action Res 26, 377–395 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9257-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9257-5