Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Innovation Action Research for Lifestyle Improvement of Child Labour in Tehran (Social Innovation’s Idea on Child Labour Lifestyle)

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 31 March 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Child labour has become an ever growing social problem in developing countries like Iran. This study presents a strategy for solving this problem regarding human development and their capabilities through identifying child labour in Tehran. The approach is the idea of production, proliferation and distribution of medicinal plants, which has been presented by Salam Social Innovation Center. As an action research inquiry process, the study has adapted this idea to the stages of social innovation. In the project, 46 street children with their families participated. The results demonstrate their empowerment and satisfaction; their self-sufficiency is also estimated in near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that supports the findings of this study is gathered by Salam innovation center as an agent of non-governmental organization in Iran, but official statistics cannot be published due to the lack of official government permission.

Change history

References

  • Ali M, Shahabb S, Ushijimaa H, Muynck A (2004) Street children in Pakistan: a situational analysis ofsocialconditions and nutritional status. Soc Sci Med 59:1707–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammar NH (2009) The relationship between street children and the justice system in Egypt. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 53(5):556–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelidou M, Psaltoglou A (2017) An empirical investigation of social innovation initiatives for sustainable urban development. Sustain Cities Soc 33:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aptekar L (1994) Street children in the developing world: a review of their condition. Cross-Cult Res 28(3):195–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aransiola JO, Bamiwuye O, Akinyemi AI, Ikuteyijo LO (2009) Proliferation of street children in Nigeria issues and challenges. J Soc Work 9(4):371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer MS (2015) Generative mechanisms transforming the social order. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Avelino F, Wittmayer JM, Pel B, Weaver P, Dumitru A, Haxeltine A, Kemp R, Jørgensen MS, Bauler T, Ruijsink S, O’Riordan T (2019) Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 145:195–206

  • Barton J, Emery M, Flood RL, Selsky JW, Wolstenholme E (2004) A maturing of systems thinking? Evidence from three perspectives. Syst Pract Action Res 17(1):3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton J, Stephens J, Haslett T (2009) Action research: its foundations in open systems thinking and relationship to the scientific method. Syst Pract Action Res 22(6):475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beers HV (1996) A Plea for a child-centred approach in research with street children. Childhood 3:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri M, Bhukuth A, Ballet J (2011) Re-examining children’s economic and non-economic activities using the capability approach. In: Children and the capability approach. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 286–303

  • Checkland P, Holwell S (1998) Action research: its nature and validity. Syst Pract Action Res 11(1):9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng F, Lam D (2010) How is street life? An examination of the subjective wellbeing of street children in China. Int Soc Work 53(3):353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow J, Ren C, Mathias B, Liu J (2019) InterBoxes: a social innovation in education in rural China. Child Youth Serv Rev 101:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilvers J, Longhurst N (2015) A relational Co-productionist approach to sociotechnical transitions. Science, Society and Sustainability (3S). Research Group Working Paper, University of East Anglia. https://uea3s.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/chilvers-and-longhurst-3swp-2015-27.pdf. Accessed 1/4/16

  • Chilvers J, Longhurst N (2016) Participation in transition (s): reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse. J Environ Plann Policy Manag 18(5):585–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estensoro M (2015) How can social innovation be facilitated? Experiences from an action research process in a local network. Syst Pract Action Res 28(6):527–545

  • Fernandes GT, Vaughn MG (2015) Brazilian street children contextual influences in relation to substance misuse. Int Soc Work 51(5):669–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL (2000) A brief review of Peter B. Checkland’s contribution to systemic thinking. Syst Pract Action Res 13(6):723–731

  • Flood RL (2010) The relationship of ‘systems thinking ‘to action research. Syst Pract Action Res 23(4):269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontan JM, Denis H, Juan- Louis K (2013) Partnership-based research: coproduction of knowledge and contribution to social innovation. In: The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research, pp 308–320

  • Gao Y, Atkinson-Sheppard S, Yu Y, Xiong G (2018) A review of the national policies on street children in China. Child Youth Serv Rev 98:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia M, Eizaguirre S, Pradel M (2015) Social innovation and creativity in cities: a socially inclusive governance approach in two peripheral spaces of Barcelona. City Cult Soc 6(4):93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gossling S, Schumacher K, Morelle M, Berger R, Heck N (2004) Tourism and street children in Antananarivo, Madagascar. Tour Hosp Res 5(2):131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundling J, Grundling I (2005) The concrete particulars of the everyday realities of street children. Human Relations 58(2):173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert A (2010) Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union

  • Lalor KJ (1999) Street children: a comparetive perspective. Child Abuse Negl 23(8):759–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam DOB, Cheng FC (2012) Homeless people: Street children in Asia. Home and Homelessness, 132–136

  • MacDonald C (2012) Understanding participatory action research: a qualitative research methodology option. The Canadian Journal of Action Research 13(2):34–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur M, Rathore P, Mathur M (2009) Incidence, type and intensity of abuse in street children in India. Child Abuse Negl 33:907–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulaert F (ed) (2013) The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan G, Tucker S, Ali R, Sanders B (2007) Social Innovation: what it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated. Skollcentre for social entrepreneurship. Oxford Said Business School

  • Murray R, Caulier-Grice J, Mulgan G (2010) The open book of social innovation. The Young Foundation/NESTA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Natha R, Shannona H, Georgiadesb K, Swordc W, Rainaa P (2016) The impact of drop-in centers on the health of street children in New Delhi, India: a cross-sectional study. Child Abuse Negl 6:122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochocka J, Janzen R, Nelson G (2002) Sharing Power and knowledge: professional and mental health consumer/survivor researchers working together in a participatory action research project. Psychiatr Rehabil J 25(4):379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker S (Ed) (2006) The life cycle of entrepreneurial ventures. Springer US, Springer Science and Business Media

  • Pasyar S, Rezaei S, Mousavi SV (2019) Stress-coping strategies, attachment styles, and resiliency of working children in Tehran, Iran. Child Indic Res 12(3):1083–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinzón-Rondón AM, Hofferth S, Briceño L (2008) Children working in the streets of Colombian cities: different pathways to the street lead to different populations. Child Youth Serv Rev 30(12):1417–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probert SK (2002) Atlantic crossings: a genealogical analysis of the relationship between systems thinking and action research in the United Kingdom. In: Synergy matters. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 193–197

  • Rametse N, Shah H (2013) Investigating social entrepreneurship in developing countries. World Rev Bus Res 3(2):95–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm NR (2015) Reviewing the transformative paradigm: a critical systemic and relational (Indigenous) lens. Syst Pract Action Res 28(5):411–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somekh B (1995) The contribution of action research to development in social endeavors: a position paper on action research methodology. Br Edu Res J 21(3):339–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart EA, Wright JD (2001) Street children: cultural concerns. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 2(23):533–538

  • Tudoric-Ghemo A (2005) Life on the Street and the mental health of street children- a developmental perspective. Magister Dissertation in psychology. University of Johannesburg

  • Woan J, Linand J, Auerswald C (2013) The health status of street children and youth in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. J Adolesc Health 53:314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong LHM, Davison RM (2018) Knowledge sharing in a global logistics provider: an action research project. Inf Manag 55:547–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarezadeh T (2013) Investigating the status of the street children: challenges andopportunities. Soc Behav Sci 84:1431–1436

  • Zuber-Skerritt O (2001) Action learning and action research: paradigm, praxis and programs. Effective change management through action research and action learning: Concepts, perspectives, processes and applications, pp 1–20

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Asghar Sadabadi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: all authors are affiliated with the “Institute for Science and Technology Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran”.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadabadi, A.A., Fehri, F.S. & Fartash, K. Social Innovation Action Research for Lifestyle Improvement of Child Labour in Tehran (Social Innovation’s Idea on Child Labour Lifestyle). Syst Pract Action Res 35, 89–105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-021-09563-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-021-09563-y

Keywords

Navigation