Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New life for Carnap’s Aufbau?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rudolf Carnap’s Der logische Aufbau der Welt (The Logical Structure of the World) is generally conceived of as being the failed manifesto of logical positivism. In this paper we will consider the following question: How much of the Aufbau can actually be saved? We will argue that there is an adaptation of the old system which satisfies many of the demands of the original programme. In order to defend this thesis, we have to show how a new ‘Aufbau-like’ programme may solve or circumvent the problems that affected the original Aufbau project. In particular, we are going to focus on how a new system may address the well-known difficulties in Carnap’s Aufbau concerning abstraction, dimensionality, and theoretical terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berge C. (1989) Hypergraphs. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1928). Der logische Aufbau der Welt, Berlin: Weltkreis (R. Carnap, Trans., The logical structure of the world, 1967, trans. by R. George. Berkeley: University of California Press.).

  • Carnap R. (1929) Abriss der Logistik. Springer, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1936/1937). Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3, 420–268, and 4, 1–40.

  • Carnap, R. (1959). Theoretical concepts in science. Lecture, published in Psillos (2000).

  • Carnap R. (1963) Intellectual autobiography. In: Schilpp P. A. (eds) The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Open Court, Peru, IL, pp 3–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R. (1966a) Philosophical foundations of physics. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1966b). On the use of Hilbert’s ϵ-operator in scientific theories. In Y. Bar-Hillel, et al. (Eds.), Essays on the foundations of mathematics (pp. 156–164). Jerusalem: The Magnes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers D. J., Jackson F. (2001) Conceptual analysis and reductive explanation. Philosophical Review 110: 315–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Demopoulos W., Friedman M. (1985) Bertrand Russell’s Analysis of matter: Its historical context and contemporary interest. Philosophy of Science 52: 621–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberle R. A. (1975) A construction of quality classes improved upon the Aufbau. In: Hintikka J. (eds) Rudolf Carnap, logical empiricist. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M. (1999) Reconsidering logical positivism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P. (1990) Induction, conceptual spaces, and AI. Philosophy of Science 57: 78–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P. (2000) Conceptual spaces. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour C. (1980) Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C. (1992). Android epistemology: Computation, artificial intelligence, and the philosophy of science. In M. H. Salmon, et al. (Eds.), Introduction to the philosophy of science (pp. 364–403). Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N. (1951) The structure of appearance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N. (1963) The significance of Der logische Aufbau der Welt. In: Schilpp P. A. (eds) The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Open Court, La Salle, pp 545–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N. (1972) Seven strictures on similarity. In: Goodman N. (eds) Problems and projects. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, pp 437–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum A. (1953) Whitehead’s method of extensive abstraction. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science IV(15): 215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketland J. (2004) Empirical adequacy and ramsification. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman J. (2002) Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitgeb H. (2007) A new analysis of quasianalysis. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36(2): 181–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitgeb, H. (2008). Empirical content and its presuppositions. Unpublished draft.

  • Lewis D. (1970) How to define theoretical terms. The Journal of Philosophy 67(13): 427–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1983) New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61(4): 343–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matousek J. (2002) Lectures on discrete geometry. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H., & Oliver, A. (Eds.). (1997). Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mormann T. (1997) Repräsentation, Struktur, Quasianalyse. Formale Aspekte einer Carnapianischen Konstitutionstheorie. In: Meggle G. (eds) Analyomen 2. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 431–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulines C. U. (1991) Making sense of Carnap’s Aufbau. Erkenntnis 35: 263–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau D. (1996) Theory-dependent terms. Philosophy of Science 63(1): 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. V. (1969) Epistemology naturalized. In: Quine W. V. (eds) Ontological relativity and other essays. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 69–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. V. (1993) In praise of observation sentences. Journal of Philosophy 90(3): 107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. V. (1995) From stimulus to science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. V. O. (1951) Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60: 20–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psillos S. (2000) Rudolf Carnap’s ‘Theoretical concepts in science’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31(1): 151–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1931). Theories. In R. B. Braithwaite (Ed.), The foundations of mathematics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Reprinted from F. P. Ramsey. Philosophical papers, pp. 112–136, by D. H. Mellor, Ed., 1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

  • Richardson A. (1998) Carnap’s construction of the world: The Aufbau and the emergence of logical empiricism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Pereyra G. (2002) Resemblance nominalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Runggaldier, E. (1984). Carnap’s early conventionalism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  • Russell, B. (1954). The analysis of matter. London: George Allen & Unwin (The analysis of matter appeared first in 1927).

  • Russell, B. (1961). Our knowledge of the external world. London: George Allen & Unwin (The first edition appeared in 1914).

  • Schurz, G. (2006). Semantic holism and (non-)compositionality in scientific theories. In M. Werning, et al. (Eds.), The compositionality of meaning and content, Vol. I: Foundational issues (pp. 271–284). Frankfurt: Ontos Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall J. (1989) Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica 43: 99–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zach R. (2003) The practice of finitism. Epsilon calculus and consistency proofs in Hilbert’s program. Synthese 137: 211–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Philosophy and Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Hannes Leitgeb

Authors
  1. Hannes Leitgeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Leitgeb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leitgeb, H. New life for Carnap’s Aufbau?. Synthese 180, 265–299 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9605-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9605-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation