Skip to main content
Log in

The inverse spaceship paradox

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article I propose what I call the inverse spaceship paradox. The article’s interest lies in the fact that, contrary to what appears to be an implicit agreement in the literature on indeterminism, it shows that coming from infinity can be a perfectly predictable and therefore deterministic process in a classical universe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benardete J. A. (1964) Infinity: An essay in metaphysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark M. (2002) Paradoxes from A to Z. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore A. W. (1990) The infinite. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oppy G. (2006) Philosophical perspectives on infinity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Laraudogoitia J. (1997) Classical particle dynamics, indeterminism and a supertask. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48: 49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell B. (1921) The analysis of mind. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen B. C. (1989) Laws and symmetry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Laraudogoitia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laraudogoitia, J.P. The inverse spaceship paradox. Synthese 178, 429–435 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9649-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9649-y

Keywords

Navigation