Abstract
The field of ethics in medical research has seen important developments in the last three decades, but it also faces great challenges in the new century. The purposes of this report are to examine the current status of ethics of medical research involving human subjects and the nature of the ethical challenges facing this research, to identify the weakness of the current system of safeguards for ethical research, and to stress the importance of the ethical character of the researcher, which is the safeguard that has the greatest potential for protecting the research subjects. Researchers appreciate the risks of human medical research that create ethical dilemmas and the need for an ethical compromise in order to proceed with the research. The main elements of the compromise, formulated primarily from experiences in the Second World War, include: (1) the dominant position of the ethical principle of autonomy; (2) the demand for a signed informed consent; (3) the likelihood of improving health with the research protocol, which must be approved by a duly appointed supervising committee; and (4) an acceptable risk/benefit ratio. The main weakness of this set of safeguards is the difficulty with obtaining a truly informed consent. The new challenges to ethical medical research stem from certain types of research, such as genetic and stem cell research, and from the increasing involvement of the industry in planning and funding the research studies. Developing medical researchers with an ethical character and knowledge about ethics in medicine may be the most effective safeguard in protecting participants of medical research experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kaiser J (2007) Clinical research. Death prompts a review of gene therapy vector. Science 317:580
Veatch RM (2000) Cross-cultural perspectives in medical ethics, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts
Veatch RM, Mason CG (1987) Hippocratic vs. Judeo-Christian medical ethics: principles in conflict. J Relig Ethics 15:86–108
Harakas SS (2003) For the health of body and soul: an Eastern Orthodox introduction to bioethics. Available online at http://www.goarch.org/en/ourfaith/articles/article8076.asp
Rahman A, Amine C, Elkadi A (2000) Islamic code of medical professional ethics. In: Veatch RM (ed) Cross-cultural perspectives in medical ethics, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts, pp 233–239
Bleich FD (2000) An obligation to heal in the Judaic tradition. In: Veatch RM (ed) Cross-cultural perspectives in medical ethics, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts, pp 62–77
Nolan K (2000) Buddhism, Zen and bioethics. In: Veatch RM (ed) Cross-cultural perspectives in medical ethics, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts, pp 262–292
Desai PN (2000) Medical ethics in India. In: Veatch RM (ed) Cross-cultural perspectives in medical ethics, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts, pp 240–258
Qiu RZ (2000) Medicine—the art of humaneness. On ethics in traditional Chinese medicine. In: Veatch RM (ed) Cross-cultural perspectives in medical ethics, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts, pp 292–308
Kasenene P (2000) African ethical theory and the four principles. In: Veatch RM (ed) Cross-cultural perspectives in medical ethics, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts, pp 347–357
Barenblatt D (2004) A plague upon humanity: the secret genocide of axis Japan’s germ warfare operation. Harper Collins, New York
Nie JB (2006) The United States cover-up of Japanese wartime medical atrocities: complicity committed in the national interest and two proposals for contemporary action. Am J Bioeth 6:W21–W33
Shuster E (1997) Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg code. N Engl J Med 337:1436–1440
Pence GE (2004) Classic cases in medical ethics, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Jonsen AR (1989) The ethics of using human volunteers for high-risk research. J Infect Dis 160:205–208
Waldman MR (2006) A case for the moral organ? Science 314:57–58
Amdur R (2002) The institutional review board member handbook. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts
National Archives. Complete transcripts of the Nuremberg Medical Trial: United States vs. Karl Brand et al. (Case 1). National Archives, 21 November 1946 to 20th August 1947. Microfilm publication no. M887. Washington, DC
Harkness JM (1996) Nuremberg and the issue of wartime experiments on US prisoners. The Green committee. JAMA 276:1672–1675
Rothman DJ, Rothman SM (1984) The Willowbrook wars. Harper & Row, New York
Katz J, Capron AM, Glass ES (1972) Experimentation with human beings. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 186–188
Curran WJ (1973) The Tuskegee syphilis study. N Engl J Med 287:730–731
Murphy TC (2004) Case studies in biomedical research ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 21–22
Beecher HK (1966) Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med 274:1354–1360
The Helsinki declaration. Home page at http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1978) The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for protection of human subjects of research; DHEW publication no. (OS) 78-0012, Washington, DC
Paul D Informed consent. Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative. http://www.citiprogram.org
World Health Organization (1995) Guidelines for good clinical practice (GCP) for trials on pharmaceutical products. In: The use of essential drugs 97-137, Technical Report Series No. 850, Annex 3
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (1996) Guideline for good clinical practice. Available online at http://www.ich.org/LOB/media/MEDIA482.pdf
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) (2003) International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Available online at http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_nov_2002.htm
Gatter R (2006) Conflicts of interest in international human drug research and the insufficiency of international protections. Am J Law Med 32:351–364
Angel M (1997) The ethics of clinical research in the Third World. N Engl J Med 337:847–849
Tempels P (1959) Bantu Philosophy. Presence Africaine, Paris
Glew RH (2008) Promoting collaborations between biomedical scholars in the U.S. and sub-Saharan Africa. J Exp Biol Med (in press)
Donagan A (1977) The theory of morality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, p 6
Benjamin M (1981) Ethics and religion. In: Brody H (ed) Ethical decisions in medicine, 2nd edn. Little Brown, Boston, pp 359–364
Jewish Encyclopedia. Available online at http://jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=301&letter=G
Hudson Jones A, McLellan F (2000) Ethical issues in biomedical publication. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Brody H (1981) Ethical decisions in medicine, 2nd edn. Little Brown, Boston, pp 59–71
Beecher HK (1966) Consent in clinical experimentation: myth and reality. JAMA 195:34–35
Ingelfinger FJ (1972) Informed (but uneducated) consent. N Engl J Med 287:465–466
Laforet EG (1976) The fiction of informed consent. JAMA 235:1579–1585
Kaplan SR, Greenwald RA, Rogers AI (1977) Neglected aspects of informed consent. N Engl J Med 296:1127
Do not ask or do not answer? The Economist, 23 August 23 2007
McGuire AL, Cho MK, McGuire SE, Caulfield T (2007) Medicine. The future of personal genomics. Science 317:1687
National Health and Medical Research Council (2000) Ethical aspects on human genetic testing: an information paper. NHMRC publication, Commonwealth of Australia. Available online at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e39syn.htm
Offit K, Thom P (2007) Ethical and legal aspects of cancer genetic testing. Semin Oncol 34:535–443
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2007) Human Genome Project Information: ethical, legal, social issues. Available online at http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/elsi.shtml
Hoag H (2006) Trial blazers. Nature 442:480–481
Chadwick D, Privitera M (2006) How skeptical should we be about industry-sponsored studies? Neurology 67:378–379
Johnston BC, Vohra S (2006) Investigator-initiated trials are more impartial. Nature 443:144
Twombly R (2007) Small study on industry trial sponsorship leads to big questions about quality and bias. J Nat Cancer Inst 99:988–990
Emanuel EJ, Miller FG (2001) The ethics of placebo-controlled trials—a middle ground. N Engl J Med 345:915–919
Huston P, Peterson R (2001) Withholding proven treatment in clinical research. N Engl J Med 345:912–914
Kaiser J (2006) Bioethics. Researchers attack newspaper probe of trials. Science 313:1714
Mello MM, Joffe S (2007) Compact versus contract—industry sponsors’ obligations to their research subjects. N Engl J Med 356:2737–2743
Lenzer J (2006) Researcher received undisclosed payments of 300,000 dollars from Pfizer. BMJ 333:1237
Hauser MD (2006) Moral minds: how nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. Ecco (Harper Collins), New York
Acknowledgments
This report was generated from a presentation by the first author at the Kithirian Days on Hypertension and Nephrology in Kithira, Greece, August 2007. The authors want to express their thanks to the organizing committee and particularly its president Nikolaos Papagalanis, M.D., for providing the forum for this presentation and inspiring this report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tzamaloukas, A.H., Konstantinov, K.N., Agaba, E.I. et al. Twenty-first Century ethics of medical research involving human subjects: achievements and challenges. Int Urol Nephrol 40, 153–163 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-007-9319-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-007-9319-2