Abstract
We studied the influence of site conditions on epiphytic orchids under a subtropical climate in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. We analysed 96 systematically distributed grid points situated in Kathmandu Valley across a land-use intensity gradient (national park to urbanised city area). Geographical Information System (GIS) and remote sensing were used for classification of land-use types. We identified 23 species of epiphytic orchids, within 13 genera, from 42 different host tree species. Host preference is obvious for some orchid species (e.g., Dendrobium nobile), with certain tree species (e.g., Schima wallichii, Ficus religiosa) hosting more orchid species than others. The orchid Rhynchostylis retusa was the most common species found on many different host tree species across the land-use intensity gradient. Host species and host bark characteristics (e.g., rugosity, pH and exposure to wind) played a vital role for orchid distribution, with lower abundance in areas of higher impact. Under strong human impact (urban city area), F. religiosa was the dominant host tree, with large individual trees (mean diameter in breast height, dbh = 1.3 m) providing the habitat for considerable populations of R. retusa individuals. In general, epiphytic orchids were found on larger host trees in urban areas than in areas of lower human impact. We found that some hosts are more likely to harbour orchid species, especially native host species. Older larger trees with rougher bark, low pH, exposed to wind and reduced human impact provided better habitats for orchids. We suggest these characteristics should be considered in urban planning to reduce human impact on the associated orchid epiphytic community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya KP, Vetaas OR, Birks HJB (2011) Orchid species richness along Himalayan elevational gradients. J Biogeogr 38:1821–1833
Adhikari YP, Fischer A (2011) Distribution pattern of the epiphytic orchid Rhynchostylis retusa under strong human influence in Kathmandu valley, Nepal. Botanica Orientalis—J Plant Sci 8:90–99
Adhikari YP, Fischer A, Fischer HS (2012) Micro-site conditions of epiphytic orchids in a human impact gradient in Kathmandu valley. Nepal J Mt Sci 9:331–342
Austin PC, Hux JE (2002) A brief note on overlapping confidence intervals. J Vasc Surg 36:194–195
Belinchon R, Martinez I, Aragon G, Escudero A, De La Cruz M (2011) Fine spatial pattern of an epiphytic lichen species is affected by habitat conditions in two forest types in the Iberian Mediterranean region. Fungal Biol 115:1270–1278
Benzing DH (1990) Vascular epiphytes general biology and related biota. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bergstrom BJ, Carter R (2008) Host-tree selection by an epiphytic orchid, Epidendrum magnoliae Muhl. (green fly orchid), in an inland hardwood hammock in Georgia. Southeast Nat 7:571–580
Callaway RM, Reinhart KO, Moore GW, Moore DJ, Pennings SC (2002) Epiphyte host preferences and host traits: mechanisms for species-specific interactions. Oecologia 132:221–230
Chaudhary RP (1998) Biodiversity in Nepal: status and conservation. S. Devi, Saharanpur, India & Tecpress Books, Bangkok, Thailand
Christenson E (2003) A handbook to the orchids of the Machu Picchu National Sanctuary. The Peruvian Trust Fund for National Parks and Protected Areas (PROFONAPE). Lima, Peru, p 140
Farmer AM, Bates JW, Bell JNB (1990) Short communications: a comparison of methods for the measurement of bark pH. Lichenologist 22:191–197
Frei JK, Dodson CH (1972) The chemical effect of certain bark substrates on the germination and early growth of epiphytic orchids. Bull Torrey Bot Club 99:301–307
Gentry AH, Dodson CH (1987) Diversity and biogeography of neotropical vascular epiphytes. Miss Bot Gar Press 74:205–233
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):9
Hirata A, Kamijo T, Saito S (2009) Host trait preferences and distribution of vascular epiphytes in a warm-temperate forest. Plant Ecol 201:247–254
Köster N, Nieder J, Barthlott W (2011) Effect of host tree traits on epiphyte diversity in natural and anthropogenic habitats in Ecuador. Biotropica 43:685–694
Krömer T, Kessler M, Robbert Gradstein S, Acebey A (2005) Diversity patterns of vascular epiphytes along an elevational gradient in the Andes. J Biogeogr 32:1799–1809
Larrea ML, Werner FA (2010) Response of vascular epiphyte diversity to different land-use intensities in a neotropical montane wet forest. For Ecol Manage 260:1950–1955
Laube S, Zotz G (2006) Neither host-specific nor random: vascular epiphytes on three tree species in a Panamanian lowland forest. Ann Bot 97:1103–1114
Madison M (1977) Vascular epiphytes: their systematic occurrence and salient features. Selbyana 2:1–13
Manandhar NP (2002) Plants and people of Nepal. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA
Massara AC, Bates JW, Bell JNB (2009) Exploring causes of the decline of the lichen Lecanora conizaeoides in Britain: effects of experimental N and S applications. Lichenologist 41:673–681
Migenis LE, Ackerman JD (1993) Orchid–phorophyte relationships in a forest watershed in Puerto Rico. J Tropl Ecol 9:231–240
Mitchell AW, Secoy K, Jackson T (2002) The global canopy handbook. Techniques of access and study in the forest roof. Global Canopy Programme, Oxford
Mullerova J, Vitkova M, Vitek O (2011) The impacts of road and walking trails upon adjacent vegetation: effects of road building materials on species composition in a nutrient poor environment. Sci Total Environ 409:3839–3849
Nadkarni NM (1984) Epiphyte biomass and nutrient capital of a neotropical elfin forest. Biotropica 16:249–256
Nadkarni N, Solano R (2002) Potential effects of climate change on canopy communities in a tropical cloud forest: an experimental approach. Oecologia 131:580–586
Nadkarni N, Wheelwright NT (2000) Monteverde: ecology and conservation of a tropical cloud forest. Oxford University Press, New York
Nieder JP, Michaloud G (2001) Epiphytes and their contribution to canopy diversity. Plant Ecol 153:51–63
Pant PR, Dangol D (2009) Kathmandu Valley profile, briefing paper: governance and infrastructure development challenges in the Kathmandu Valley. Workshop: 11–13 February 2009 Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal, pp 15
Press JR, Shrestha KK, Sutton DA (2000) Annotated checklist of the flowering plants of Nepal. British Museum (Natural History), London, UK
Rajbhandari KR, Bhattarai S, Joshi R (2000) Orchid diversity of Nepal and their conservation need. In: Proceedings of 8th International Workshop of BIO-REFOR: Biotechnology Applications for Reforestation and Biodiversity Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal, 28 November–2 December, 1999 (Bista et al., eds.), pp 249–252. BIO-REFOR, IUFRO/SPDC, Tokyo
Shrestha R (2000) Some medicinal orchids of Nepal. In: Watanabe R et al (eds) The Himalayan plants: can they save us? Proceedings of Nepal–Japan Joint Symposium on Conservation and Utilization of Himalayan Medicinal Resources. Society for the Conservation and Development of Himalayan Medicinal Resources SCDHMR, Japan, pp 153–156
Shrestha TK (2003) Wildlife of Nepal: a study of renewable resources of Nepal Himalayas. Reprint, Kathmandu, Nepal
Song L, Liu WY, Ma WZ, Tan ZH (2011) Bole epiphytic bryophytes on Lithocarpus xylocarpus (Kurz) Markgr. in the Ailao Mountains. SW China Ecol Res 26:351–363
R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. URL: http://www.R-project.org/. Vienna
Tupac OJ, Aragon S, Ackerman JD (2007) Site variation in spatial aggregation and phorophyte preference in Psychilis monensis (Orchidaceae). Biotropica 39:227–231
Turner TH, Tan HTW, Wee YC, Ibrahim AB, Chew PT, Corlett RT (1994) A study of plant species extinction in Singapore: lessons for the conservation of tropical biodiversity. Conserv Biol 8:705–712
Vance ED, Nadkarni NM (1990) Microbial biomass and activity in canopy organic matter and the forest floor of a tropical cloud forest. Soil Biol Biochem 22:677–684
Villalobos AL, Palacios AF, Pulido RO (2008) The relationship between bark peeling rate and the distribution and mortality of two epiphyte species. Plant Ecol 198:265–274
WCSP (2011) World checklist of selected plant families. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. URL: http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/. Accessed 5 Jan 2011
Wolf JHD, Konings CJF (2001) Toward the sustainable harvesting of epiphytic bromeliads: a pilot study from the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Biol Conserv 101:23–31
Wolf JHD, Gradstein SR, Nadkarni NM (2009) A protocol for sampling vascular epiphyte richness and abundance. J Trop Ecol 25:107–121
Zimmerman JK, Olmsted IC (1992) Host tree utilization by vascular epiphytes in a seasonally inundated forest (Tintal) in Mexico. Biotropica 24:402–407
Zotz G (2007) Johansson revisited: the spatial structure of epiphyte assemblages. J Veg Sci 18:123–130
Zotz G, Vollrath B (2003) The epiphyte vegetation of the palm Socratea exorrhiza—correlations with tree size, tree age and bryophyte cover. J Trop Ecol 19:81–90
Zurick D, Pacheco J, Shrestha B, Bajracharya B (2005) Atlas of the Himalaya. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) pp 17–90
Zytynska SE, Fay MF, Penney D, Preziosi RF (2011) Genetic variation in a tropical tree species influences the associated epiphytic plant and invertebrate communities in a complex forest ecosystem. Phil Trans R Soc B 366:1329–1336
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the helps of A. Sharma and P. Bhattarai (members of Canopy and Environment Conservation Nepal) during field work. We thank to D. M. Adhikari, Nepal, for help in remote sensing and GIS mapping. We thank S. E. Zytynska and three anonymous reviewers who provided comments and constructive criticism. We are indebted to Technische Universität München Graduate School for the research grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adhikari, Y.P., Fischer, H.S. & Fischer, A. Host tree utilization by epiphytic orchids in different land-use intensities in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Plant Ecol 213, 1393–1412 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0099-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0099-0