Skip to main content
Log in

Public, Private, or In-Between? The Legitimacy of Social Enterprises in the Housing Market

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social housing in Western welfare states has undergone change over recent decades, characterised by greater reliance on private actors, market mechanisms and commercial capital. Within housing research, this shift has been described as a linear ‘migration from the public sector towards the private market’, and conceptualised as ‘modernisation’. While empirical change calls for conceptual renewal, the labels we apply to processes of change may limit or enhance potential to understand them. This paper explores the problem of conceptualising change in social housing, focusing on a key facilitator of market-based reforms: the mobilisation of private not-for-profit housing associations as social enterprises in the housing market. It explores their changing roles in English and Dutch housing provision, tracking state policy shifts and debate over their organisational legitimacy for insights into their emergence and trajectories. Contrary to linear ‘modernisation’, findings suggest cyclical movement. Over time, aspects of the work and identity of housing associations shift between public and private domains.

Résumé

Le logement social dans les états providence occidentaux a fait l’objet d’une évolution au cours des récentes décennies, se caractérisant par un recours accru aux intervenants privés, aux mécanismes du marché ainsi qu’au capital commercial. Au sein de la recherche sur le logement, cette mutation a été décrite comme une « migration linéaire du secteur public vers le marché privé » , et conceptualisée à titre de « modernisation » . Si le changement empirique impose un renouveau conceptuel, les désignations que nous attribuons aux processus de changement sont susceptibles de limiter ou d’optimiser le potentiel pour les comprendre. Cet article s’intéresse au problème de la conceptualisation du changement dans le secteur du logement social, en s’attachant particulièrement à un élément facilitateur clé des réformes basées sur le marché, à savoir la mobilisation des associations d’aide au logement, privées et sans but lucratif en tant qu’entreprises sociales au sein du marché du logement. Les transformations de leurs rôles en matière d’attribution de logement en Angleterre et aux Pays-Bas, sont analysées par une étude des variations quant aux politiques des états et du débat portant sur leur légitimité organisationnelle afin de recueillir des éléments sur leur émergence et leurs trajectoires. Contrairement à la « modernisation » linéaire, les conclusions indiquent un mouvement cyclique. Au cours du temps, les aspects du travail et de l’identité des associations d’aide au logement alternent entre les secteurs public et privé.

Zusammenfassung

Das soziale Wohnungswesen in westlichen Sozialstaaten unterlag in den letzten Jahrzehnten Veränderungen, die im Einzelnen durch eine größere Abhängigkeit von privaten Akteuren, Marktmechanismen und kommerziellem Kapital gekennzeichnet sind. In Forschungen zum Wohnungswesen wird diese Veränderung als eine lineare „Migration vom öffentlichen Sektor in Richtung des privaten Marktes“beschrieben und als „Modernisierung“konzeptualisiert. Eine empirische Veränderung verlangt eine begriffliche Erneuerung; doch können die Bezeichnungen für Änderungsprozesse das Verständnis entweder einschränken oder fördern. Dieser Beitrag untersucht das Problem der Konzeptualisierung der Veränderungen im sozialen Wohnungswesen und konzentriert sich dabei auf einen entscheidenden Antriebsfaktor für marktbasierte Reformen: die Mobilisierung privater gemeinnütziger Wohnungsbaugesellschaften als Sozialunternehmen auf dem Wohnungsmarkt. Der Beitrag erforscht ihre sich wandelnden Funktionen in der Wohnraumbereitstellung in England und den Niederlanden, wobei die Änderungen in der staatlichen Politik verfolgt und ihre organisationale Legitimität diskutiert werden, um Einblicke in ihre Entwicklung und ihren Bewegungsverlauf zu verschaffen. Im Gegensatz zu einer linearen „Modernisierung“weisen die Ergebnisse auf eine zyklische Bewegung hin. Aspekte der Arbeit und Identität der Wohnungsbaugesellschaften wechseln im Laufe der Zeit zwischen den öffentlichen und privaten Bereichen.

Resumen

La vivienda social en los estados del bienestar occidentales ha sufrido cambios a lo largo de las últimas décadas, caracterizados por una mayor confianza en actores privados, mecanismos de mercado y capital comercial. Dentro de la investigación sobre vivienda, este cambio ha sido descrito como una “migración lineal desde el sector público hacia el mercado privado”, y se ha conceptualizado como “modernización”. Aunque el cambio empírico exige renovación conceptual, las etiquetas que aplicamos a los procesos de cambio pueden limitar o destacar el potencial para comprenderlos. El presente documento explora el problema del cambio conceptualizante en la vivienda social, centrándose en un facilitador clave de reformas basadas en el mercado: la movilización de cooperativas privadas de viviendas sin ánimo de lucro como empresas sociales en el mercado de la vivienda. Explora sus papeles cambiantes en la provisión de viviendas inglesas y holandesas, siguiendo el rastro de los cambios de la política estatal y el debate sobre su legitimidad organizativa en busca de percepciones sobre su surgimiento y trayectorias. Contrarios a la “modernización” lineal, los hallazgos sugieren un movimiento cíclico. Con el tiempo, aspectos del trabajo e identidad de las cooperativas de viviendas cambian entre dominios público y privado.

摘要

最近数十年,西方福利国家的社会住房经历了巨大变化,特点是更加依赖于私人承包商、市场机制和商业资本。在住房研究内,本转变被描述为“从公共领域线性迁移到私有市场”,同时概念化为“现代化”。尽管经验性变化呼吁进行概念更新,但是我们应用到变化流程的标签可能限制或增强了解他们的潜能。本文探讨了社会住房概念化变化的问题,专注于基于市场改革的关键促进因素:促进私有非营利住房协会为住房市场的社会企业。其中探讨了它们在英国和荷兰住房供应中扮演的不断变化的角色,跟踪国家政策转变并讨论了它们崛起和发展内幕的组织合法性。与线性“现代化”相反的是,调查结果建议周期性运动。随着时间的变化,住房协会的工作和身份将在公共和私有领域之间转换。

ملخص

شهد الإسكان الإجتماعي في الحكومات الغربية التي تحمي رفاهية مواطنيها تغييرا˝ على مدى العقود الأخيرة، التي تتميز بزيادة الإعتماد على القطاعات الخاصة، وآليات السوق ورأس المال التجاري. في أبحاث الإسكان، تم وصف هذا التحول بمثابة ‘هجرة منتظمة من القطاع العام نحو سوق القطاع الخاص’، ويمكننا تشكيل تصور ‘كالتحديث’. بينما التغير التجريبي يدعو إلى تجديد المفاهيم العقلية، التسميات التي نطبقها على عمليات التغيير قد تحد أو تعزز إحتمال فهمها. يفحص هذا البحث مشكلة وضع تصور للتغيير في الإسكان الإجتماعي، مع التركيز على المسهل الرئيسي من الإصلاحات القائمة على السوق: تعبئة جمعيات الإسكان الغير هادفة للربح الخاصة والمؤسسات الإجتماعية في سوق الإسكان. فحص الأدوار المتغيرة في شرط السكن الإنجليزي والهولندي، تتبع تحولات سياسة الدولة والجدل حول شرعيتها التنظيمية لظهور نظرة ثاقبة ومسارات. خلافا ‘للتحديث المنتظم’، النتائج تشير الى حركة دورية. مع مرور الوقت، جوانب العمل وهوية جمعيات الإسكان تتحول بين المجالات العامة والخاصة.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sources: Pawson and (2012), Gemeente, Amsterdam, 2013, Vandevyvere and Zenthöfer (2012), Greater London Authority, 2013 (All figures for 2010 or 2011).

References

  • Bengtsson, B. (2001). Housing as a social right: Implications for welfare state theory. Scandinavian Political Studies, 24(4), 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blessing, A. (2012). Magical or monstrous? Hybridity in social housing governance. Housing Studies, 27(2), 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratt, R. G. (2009). Challenges for non-profit housing organizations created by the private housing market. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(1), 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown. (2011). Santander delivers borrowing blow, Inside Housing, 22/07/2011.

  • Brown. (2012). Dutch landlord financial crisis is a warning for UK, Inside Housing, 29/02/2012.

  • Bryant. (2009). ‘National Housing Federation Neighbourhoods Briefing Note: Weaver v London & Quadrant Housing Trust Reference: NS.GN.2009.BR.21, Nov 2009.

  • Cameron, D. (2011). Speech on the Big Society, Cabinet Office and Prime Minister’s Office, 10 Downing Street. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pms-speech-on-big-society. Accessed 17 July 2013.

  • Chevin, D. (2013). Social hearted, commercially minded- a report on tomorrow’s housing associations. New York: The Smith Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D., & Mahon, J. (1993). Conceptual stretching revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analyses. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 845–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czischke, D., Gruis, V., & Mullins, D. (2012). Conceptualising social enterprise in housing organisations. Housing Studies, 27(4), 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily Mail Reporter. (2012). Prioritise ‘hard-working families’ over unemployed on social housing lists, ministers urge councils, in the Daily Mail, 27 June, 2012.

  • Damen, T., & Schutten, H. (2012). Weg met de woningcorporaties [Down with the housing associations], in Het Parool, 31st May, 2012. Accessed 18 July 2013.

  • Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4), 411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). (2012). Grant Schapps: Housing help for military families, press notice, 29 June 2012.

  • Dutch Ministry of Justice. (2009). New regulations attractive to the semi-public sector, Press release, 08 July 2009.

  • Edinburgh Against Stock Transfer (EAST). (2005). Smoke and Mirrors-Documentary. http://glasgowresidents.wordpress.com/video/. Accessed 10 Jan 2013.

  • Fearn and Allen. (2012). Largest Dutch housing association faces mass sell-off of homes, The Guardian, 29 Feb 2012.

  • Geurtsen, A., & Sprenger, P.J. (2011) Accountability and Legitimacy of Social Enterprises; a Difficult but Inevitable Relationship, Paper submitted to the EGPA conference, 2011.

  • Gilmour, T., & Milligan, V. (2012). Let a hundred flowers bloom: Innovation and diversity in Australian not-for-profit housing organisations. Housing Studies, 27(4), 476–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, N. (2005). The privatisation of council housing. Critical Social Policy, 25(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1987). Time’s arrow, time’s cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2011). Laying the foundations: a housing strategy for England. http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/housing/housingstrategy2011. Accessed 21 Nov 2011.

  • Harloe, M. (1995). The people’s home? Social rented housing in Europe and America. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilditch, M. (2009) “Spot the Difference”- Inside Housing. http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/story.aspx?storycode=6505317.

  • Inside Housing. (2011). Opinion ‘The Big Challenge’, Feb 2011. http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/analysis/opinion/the-big-challenge/6513720.article.

  • Jacobs, J. (1992). Systems of survival: A dialogue on the moral foundations of commerce and politics. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J. (1995). From Public housing to the social market. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, Kersloot, & Thalmann, (2005). Non-profit housing influencing, leading and dominating the unitary rental market: Three case studies. Housing Studies, 20(6), 855–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kempen, R., & Priemus, H. (2002). Revolution in social housing in the Netherlands: Possible effects of new housing policies. Urban Studies, 39(2), 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laan E.E. van der. (2009). Voorstellen woningcorporatiestelsel [Proposals for the housing association system], Brief aan de Tweede Kamer, Ministerie van WWI, The Hague, June 12.

  • Lloyd. (2012a). Illegal sub-letting will be hard to prove, Inside Housing, 13 Jan 2012.

  • Malpass, P., & Victory, C. (2010). The modernisation of social housing in England. International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermont, M. (2010). Governing independence and expertise: The Business of Housing Associations. Oregon: Oxford and Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, V. (2003). How different? Comparing housing policies and housing affordability consequences for low income households in Australia and the Netherlands. Netherlands Geographical Studies, No. 318. Utrecht University, Utrecht.

  • Milligan, V., Gurran, N., Lawson, J., Phibbs, P., & Phillips, R. (2009). Innovation in affordable housing in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, D. (2006). Competing institutional logics, local accountability and scale and efficiency in an expanding non-profit housing sector. Public Policy and Administration, 21(3), 6–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, D., Czischke, D., & van Bortel, G. (2012). Exploring the meaning of hybridity and social enterprise in housing organisations. Housing Studies, 27(4), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, D., & Pawson, H. (2010). Housing associations: Agents of policy or profits in disguise. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organizations and the third sector: challenges for practice, theory and policy. Basingstock: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieboer, N. & Gruis, V. (2011). Shifting back in the Dutch social housing sector, Paper presented at the ENHR Conference, 5–8 July, Toulouse.

  • Orr, D. (2010). National housing federation submission to the review of the tenant services authority. London: National Housing Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, M. (2001). Meaning, science, context and confusion in comparative housing research. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, H. (2006). Restructuring England’s social housing sector since 1989: Undermining or underpinning the fundamentals of public housing? Housing Studies, 21(5), 767–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, H., & Mullins, D. (2010). After council housing, Britain’s new social landlords. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson and Wilcox. (2012). UK Housing Review 2011/2012, Chartered Institute of Housing; 20th Revised edition (31 Jan 2012).

  • Priemus, H. (2008). Real estate investors and housing associations: A level playing field? The Dutch case. European Journal of Housing Policy, 8(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priemus, & Gruis, (2011). Social housing and illegal state aid: The agreement between European commission and Dutch government. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(1), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prisk, M. (2012). Speech at National Housing Federation annual conference. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/national-housing-federation-annual-conference-2012. Accessed Sept 2013.

  • Purkis, A. (2010). Housing Associations in England and the Future of Voluntary Organisations. London: The Baring Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijksoverheid. (2012). Regeerakkoord ‘Bruggen slaan’ [Government of the Netherlands, Coalition Agreement, ‘Building Bridges’].

  • Royal Courts of Justice. (2009). Decision of the Court of Appeal: R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 587.

  • SABO. (2009). http://www.sabo.se/om_sabo/english/Sidor/default.aspx.

  • Salamon, L. (1999). The nonprofit sector at a crossroads: The case of America, voluntas. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 10(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L., & Anheier, H. (1992). In search of the nonprofit sector I: The question of definitions. Voluntas, 3(2), 125–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salet, W. (1999). Regimes shifts in Dutch housing policy. Housing Studies, 14(4), 547–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 6(4), 1033–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stakeholder interviews- not-for-profit and public sector. (2009) (2011) (2013). Several in depth interviews carried out by the author in the Netherlands and England, covering CEOs of large housing associations, peak body leaders and a public policy official.

  • Stephens, H. (2010). On the public highway, Inside Housing. http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/need-to-know/legal/on-the-public-highway/6509448.article. Accessed 16 April 2010.

  • Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, S. (2012). What’s in a name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandevyvere, W. & Zenthöfer, A. (2012). The housing market in the Netherlands European Commission -Economic Papers 457 | June 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Blessing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blessing, A. Public, Private, or In-Between? The Legitimacy of Social Enterprises in the Housing Market. Voluntas 26, 198–221 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9422-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9422-1

Keywords

Navigation