Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Distributed Kinematic Wave–Philip Infiltration Watershed Model Using FEM, GIS and Remotely Sensed Data

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distributed rainfall–runoff modeling is very important in the water resources planning of a watershed. In this study, a kinematic wave based distributed watershed model which simulates runoff on an event basis has been presented here. The finite element method (FEM) has been used to simulate the overland runoff and channel flow. Philip model has been used for the infiltration estimation. To find out runoff at the outlet of the watershed, both overland flow and channel flow models are coupled. The coupled model has been applied to a typical Indian watershed. Remotely sensed data has been used to obtain the land use (LU)/land cover (LC) for the watershed. Slope map of the watershed has been obtained using geographical information systems (GIS). The grid map of the watershed which contains overland flow elements connecting to channel flow elements has been prepared in GIS. The elemental input files such as slope and Manning’s roughness are prepared using the GIS and are directly used in the model. The model has been calibrated using some of the rainfall events and validated for some other events. The model results are compared with the observed data and found to be satisfactory. A sensitivity study of the infiltration parameters, overland and channel flow Manning’s roughness and time step has also been carried out. The developed model is useful for the simulation of event based rainfall–runoff for small watersheds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argent MA (2004) An overview of model integration for environmental applications – components, frame works and semantics. Environ Model Softw 19:219–234. http://www. sciencedirect.com

  • Blandford GE, Meadows ME (1990) Finite element simulation of nonlinear kinematic surface runoff. J Hydrol 119:335–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (1959) Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 109–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVantier BA, Feldman AD (1993) Review of GIS applications in hydrologic modeling. J Water Resour Plan Manage 119:246–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleson PS (1978) Climate, soil and vegetation 3. A simplified model of soil moisture movement in liquid phase. Water Resour Res 14:722–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin JP, Turcotte R, Massicotte S, Moussa R, Fitzback J, Villeneuve JP (2001a) Distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data, I. Description of model. J Hydrol Eng 6:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin JP, Turcotte R, Massicotte S, Moussa R, Fitzback J, Villeneuve JP (2001b) Distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data, II. Application to Chaudiere watershed. J Hydrol Eng 6:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbrecht J, Ogden FL, DeBarry PA, Maidment DR (2001) GIS and distributed watershed models. I: data coverages and sources. J Hydrol Eng 6:506–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson FM (1966) Open-channel flow. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Honore G (2005) Hydrological data of Indo-German bilateral project – watershed management. Personal Communication, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaber FH, Mohtar RH (2002) Stability and accuracy of finite element schemes for the one-dimensional kinematic wave solution. Adv Water Resour 25:427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaber FH, Mohtar RH (2003) Stability and accuracy of two dimensional kinematic wave overland flow modeling. Adv Water Resour 26:1189–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain MK, Singh VP (2005) DEM-based modelling of surface runoff using diffusion wave equation. J Hydrol 302:107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain MK, Kothyari UC, Raju KGR (2004) A GIS based distributed rainfall–runoff model. J Hydrol 299:107–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayawardena AW, White JK (1977) A finite element distributed catchment model. I. Analytical basis. J Hydrol 34:269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayawardena AW, White JK (1979) A finite element distributed catchment model, II. Application to the real catchments. J Hydrol 42:231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konikow LF, Patten EP (1985) Groundwater forecasting in hydrologic forecasting. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce CH, Cundy TW (1992) Modification of the kinematic wave–Philip infiltration overland flow model. Water Resour Res 28:1179–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden FL, Garbrecht J, DeBarry PA, Johnson LE (2001) GIS and distributed watershed models. II: modules, interfaces and models. J Hydrol Eng 6:515–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce VM (1992). Kinematic wave modeling: Where do we go from here. International Symposium on Hydrology of Mountainous Areas, National Institute of Hydrology, Shimla, India

  • Rao BV, Rao EP (1988). Surface runoff modelling of small watersheds. International Seminar on Hydrology of Extremes (Floods and Low Flows), National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee, India

  • Rao EP, Rao BV (1997). Surface runoff modelling of a watershed with land use from remotely sensed data. Workshop on remote Sensing and GIS Applications in Water Resources Engineering, Central Board of Irrigation and Power, Bangalore, India

  • Reddy JN (1993) An introduction to the finite element method. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross BB, Contractor DN, Shanholtz VO (1979). A finite element model of overland and channel flow for assessing the hydrologic impact of land-use change. J Hydrol 41:11–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saghafian B, Lieshout AMV, Rajaei HM (2000). Distributed catchment simulation using a raster GIS. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2:199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz GA (1994) Meso-scale modeling of runoff and water balances using remote sensing and other GIS data. Hydrol Sci J 39:121–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharda VN, Singh SR (1994) A finite element model for simulating runoff and soil erosion from mechanically treated agricultural lands 1.Governing equations and solutions. Water Resour Res 30:2287–2298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP (1996) Kinematic wave modeling in water resources. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui DZ, Maggio RC (1999) Integrating GIS with hydrological modeling: practices, problems, and prospects. Comput Environ Urban Syst 23:33–51. http://www. scirus.com

  • Taylor C, Al-Mashidani G, Davis JM (1974) A finite element approach to watershed runoff. J Hydrol 21:231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieux BE, Bralts VF, Segerlind LJ, Wallace RB (1990) Finite element watershed modeling: one-dimensional elements. J Water Resour Plan Manage 116:803–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieux BE (2001) Distributed hydrologic modeling using GIS. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. I. Eldho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venkata, R.K., Eldho, T.I., Rao, E.P. et al. A Distributed Kinematic Wave–Philip Infiltration Watershed Model Using FEM, GIS and Remotely Sensed Data. Water Resour Manage 22, 737–755 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9189-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9189-5

Keywords

Navigation