Abstract
Real-time monitoring of source zone of light non-aqueous liquids (LNAPLs) is important for preventing accidental pollution and taking effective underground pollution remediation measures. As a high-precision monitoring technology, cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography (CHERT) has been widely used to obtain static information regarding underground stratigraphic structures and dynamic information regarding fluid motion. The time-lapse data processing method can be used to obtain pollution zone dynamic change information. Since the leakage rate directly affects the diffusion range of pollution, this study simulated the initial evolution process of LNAPL pollution source regions under two different leakage rates. The time-lapse monitoring of the above process was performed using CHERT. The test results show that CHERT can be used to observe the migration of LNAPLs and the initial evolution of the contaminated area. Differences in leakage rate will result in variation in soil wettability and fluid distribution, which will cause changes in soil resistivity in the corresponding region. The low-saturation LNAPL-contaminated area may exhibit low-resistivity characteristics and is easily overlooked in field investigations. In addition, the degree of contamination in the saturated zone can be quantitatively evaluated by CHERT; however, the pollution range and oil saturation value determined by CHERT are underestimated. The results showed the electrical variation characteristics of the initial evolution process of the fresh pollution source area and provide data that will enable early warnings of LNAPL leakage. This shows that CHERT is a promising tool for monitoring LNAPL pollution source leakage even if further research is needed to fully understand the effect of hydrological processes on electronic signals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguilera RF (2004) A triple porosity model for Petrophysical analysis of naturally fractured reservoirs. Petrophysics 45:157–166
Andres K, Canace R (1984) Use of the electrical resistivity technique to delineate a hydrocarbon spill in the coastal plain deposits of New Jersey. In: Proceedings of the NWWA/API Conference on petroleum hydrocarbons and organic chemicals in ground water-prevention, detection and restoration, Houston. pp 188–197
Arato A, Wehrer M, Birã B, Godio A (2014) Integration of geophysical, geochemical and microbiological data for a comprehensive small-scale characterization of an aged LNAPL-contaminated site. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21:8948–8963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2171-2
Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Soc Pet Eng 146:54–62. https://doi.org/10.2118/942054-g
Atekwana EA, Atekwana EA (2010) Geophysical signatures of microbial activity at hydrocarbon contaminated sites: a review. Surv Geophys 31:247–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-009-9089-8
Atekwana EA, Sauck WA, Werkema DD, Meju MA (2000) Investigations of geoelectrical signatures at a hydrocarbon contaminated site. J Appl Geophys 44:167–180
Atekwana EA, Atekwana EA, Rowe RS, Werkema DD Jr, Legall FD (2004) The relationship of total dissolved solids measurements to bulk electrical conductivity in an aquifer contaminated with hydrocarbon. J Appl Geophys 56:281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2004.08.003
Baker R, Moore J (1998) The application of time-lapse electrical tomography in groundwater studies. Lead Edge 17:1454–1458. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437878
Barker R, Rao TV, Thangarajan M (2001) Delineation of contaminant zone through electrical imaging technique. Currentence 81:277–283
Bellmunt F, Marcuello A, Ledo J, Queralt P (2016) Capability of cross-hole electrical configurations for monitoring rapid plume migration experiments. J Appl Geophys 124:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.11.010
Cardarelli E, Filippo GD (2009) Electrical resistivity and induced polarization tomography in identifying the plume of chlorinated hydrocarbons in sedimentary formation: a case study in rho (Milan - Italy). Waste Manag Res 27:595–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x09102524
Cassiani G, Bruno V, Villa A, Fusi N, Binley AM (2006) A saline trace test monitored via time-lapse surface electrical resistivity tomography. J Appl Geophys 59:244–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.10.007
Cassiani G, Binley A, Kemna A, Wehrer M, Orozco AF, Deiana R, Boaga J, Rossi M, Dietrich P, Werban U, Zschornack L, Godio A, JafarGandomi A, Deidda GP (2014) Noninvasive characterization of the Trecate (Italy) crude-oil contaminated site: links between contamination and geophysical signals. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:8914–8931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2494-7
Chen L, Liu Q, Li Y, Lu R, Wu S, Li X, Hou T (2016) Leakage diffusion of underwater crude oil in wind fields. Springerplus 5(1875):1875. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3457-x
Daily W, Owen E (1991) Cross-borehole resistivity tomography. Geophysics 56:1228–1235. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443142
Daily W, Ramirez A, LaBrecque D, Nitao J (1992) Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement. Water Resour Res 28:1429–1442. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR03087
Delgado-Rodríguez O, Shevnin V, Ochoa-Valdés J, Ryjov A (2006) Using electrical techniques for planning the remediation process in a hydrocarbon contaminated site. Rev Int Contamin Ambien 22:157–163
Demirel C, Candansayar ME (2017) Two-dimensional joint inversions of cross-hole resistivity data and resolution analysis of combined arrays. Geophys Prospect 65:876–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12432
Deng Y, Shi X, Xu H, Sun Y, Wu J, Revil A (2016) Quantitative assessment of electrical resistivity tomography for monitoring DNAPLs migration—comparison with high-resolution light transmission visualization in laboratory sandbox. J Hydrol 544:254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.036
Donaldson EC, Siddiqui TK (1989) Relationship between the Archie saturation exponent and wettability. SPE Form Eval 4:359–362. https://doi.org/10.2118/16790-pa
Franco RD et al (2009) Monitoring the saltwater intrusion by time lapse electrical resistivity tomography: the Chioggia test site (Venice Lagoon, Italy). J Appl Geophys 69:117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.08.004
Gelius LJ, Zhong W (2010) Modelling production caused changes in conductivity for a siliciclastic reservoir: a differential effective medium approach. Geophys Prospect 56:677–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00720.x
Godio A, Arato A, Stocco S (2010) Geophysical characterization of a non aqueous-phase liquid-contaminated site. Environ Geosci 17:141–162. https://doi.org/10.1306/eg.04261010003
Grumman DL Jr, Daniels JJ (1995) Experiments on the detection of organic contaminants in the vadose zone. J Environ Eng Geophys 1:31–38. https://doi.org/10.4133/JEEG1.A.31
Halihan T, Sefa V, Sale T, Lyverse M (2017) Mechanism for detecting NAPL using electrical resistivity imaging. J Contam Hydrol 205:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.08.007
Hamzah U, Ismail MA, Samsudin AR (2009) Geoelectrical resistivity and ground penetrating radar techniques in the study of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Sains Malaysiana 38:305–311
Hu LM, Meegoda JN, Lo IMC, Liu Y, Gao SY, Wu ZQ (2010) Gasoline contaminated sites: pollutant transport and remediation. Adv Environ Geotech 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04460-1_15
Illman WA, Berg SJ, Liu X, Massi A (2010) Hydraulic/partitioning tracer tomography for DNAPL source zone characterization: small-scale sandbox. Experiments. Environ Sci Technol 44:8609–8614. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101654j
Karaoulis M, Tsourlos P, Kim JH, Revil A (2014) 4D time-lapse ERT inversion: introducing combined time and space constraints. Near Surf Geophys 11:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101654j
Keller GV, Frischknecht FC (1966) Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting. Pergamon Press
Liang C, Zheng X-L, Zhang J-J, Yue F (2011) Testing of water content in oil-contaminated porous medium. J Univ (Earth Sci Edn) 41:826–830. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5888.2011.03.029
Liang L, Abubakar A, Habashy TM (2016) Reservoir property mapping and monitoring from joint inversion of time-lapse seismic, electromagnetic, and production data. Geophysics 81:WC33–WC44. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0620.1
Loke MH (1999) Constrained Time-Lapse Resistivity Imaging Inversion Sageep:EEM7. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922877
Loke MH (2004) Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys
Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method1. Geophys Prospect 44:131–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00142.x
Lowe DF, Oubre CL, Ward CH (1999) Surfactants and Cosolvents for NAPL remediation: a technology practices manual. Crc Press
Mungan N, Moore EJ (1968) Certain wettability effects on electrical resistivity in porous media. J Can Pet Technol 7:20–25. https://doi.org/10.2118/68-01-04
Newell CJ, Acree SD, Ross RR, Huling SG (2011) Ground water issue: light nonaqueous phase liquids, vol 44, pp 1294–1295
Oldenborger GA, Knoll MD, Routh PS, Labrecque DJ (2007) Time-lapse ERT monitoring of an injection/withdrawal experiment in a shallow unconfined aquifer. Geophysics 72:F177–F187. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2734365
Orlando L, Renzi B (2015) Electrical permittivity and resistivity time lapses of multiphase DNAPLs in a lab test. Water Resour Res 51:377–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014wr015291
Pan Y, Jia Y, Wang Y, Xia X, Guo L (2018) Study on diesel vertical migration characteristics and mechanism in water-bearing sand stratum using an automated resistivity monitoring system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0698-3
Perri MT, Cassiani G, Gervasio I, Deiana R, Binley A (2012) A saline tracer test monitored via both surface and cross-borehole electrical resistivity tomography: comparison of time-lapse results. J Appl Geophys 79:6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.12.011
Peter A, Miles B, Teutsch G (2008) Estimation of emission from an LNAPL contaminated zone considering groundwater recharge. Environ Geol 55:321–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0978-1
Power C, Gerhard JI, Tsourlos P, Soupios P, Simyrdanis K, Karaoulis M (2015) Improved time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography monitoring of dense non-aqueous phase liquids with surface-to-horizontal borehole arrays. J Appl Geophys 112:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.10.022
Quyum A, Achari G, Goodman RH (2002) Effect of wetting and drying and dilution on moisture migration through oil contaminated hydrophobic soils. Sci Total Environ 296:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-9697(02)00046-3
Rao PSC, Annable MD, Kim H (2000) NAPL source zone characterization and remediation technology performance assessment: recent developments and applications of tracer techniques. J Contam Hydrol 45:63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7722(00)00119-4
Revil A, Schmutz M, Batzle ML (2011) Influence of oil wettability upon spectral induced polarization of oil-bearing sands. Geophysics 76:A31–A36. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0006.1
Rosales RM, Martínez-Pagán P, Faz A, Bech J (2014) Study of subsoil in former petrol stations in SE of Spain: physicochemical characterization and hydrocarbon contamination assessment. J Geochem Explor 147:306–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.10.006
Sadowski R (1988) Clay-organic interactions MSc Thesis, Dept of Geochemistry, Colo School of Mines, Golden, CO 209 p
Sasaki Y (1992) Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation. Geophys Prospect 40:453–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00536.x
Sauck WA (2000) A model for the resistivity structure of LNAPL plumes and their environs in sandy sediments. J Appl Geophys 44:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00021-X
Schroth MH, Istok JD, Selker JS (1998) Three-phase immiscible fluid movement in the vicinity of textural interfaces. J Contam Hydrol 32:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7722(97)00069-7
Schubert M, Paschke A, Lau S, Geyer W, Knöller K (2007) Radon as a naturally occurring tracer for the assessment of residual NAPL contamination of aquifers. Environmental Pollution 145:920–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.04.029
Shevnin V, Delgado O, Mousatov A, Nakamura E, Mejía A (2003) Oil pollution detection using resistivity sounding. Geofis Int 42:613–622
Shima H (1992) 2D and 3D resistivity imaging reconstruction using cross-hole data. Geophysics 55:682–694
Slater L, Binley AM, Daily W, Johnson R (2000) Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection. J Appl Geophys 44:85–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(00)00002-1
Slater LD, Ntarlagiannis D, Day-Lewis FD, Mwakanyamale K, Versteeg RJ, Ward A, Strickland C, Johnson CD, Lane JW Jr (2010) Use of electrical imaging and distributed temperature sensing methods to characterize surface water–groundwater exchange regulating uranium transport at the Hanford 300 Area, Washington. Water Resour Res 46:79–93. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010wr009110
Suman RJ (1997) Effects of pore structure and wettability on the electrical resistivity of partially saturated rocks—a network study. Geophysics 62:1151–1162. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444216
Thabit JM, Khalid FH (2016) Resistivity imaging survey to delineate subsurface seepage of hydrocarbon contaminated water at Karbala Governorate, Iraq. Environ Earth Sci 75(87). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4880-y
Tomlinson DW, Rivett MO, Wealthall GP, Reh S (2017) Understanding complex LNAPL sites: illustrated handbook of LNAPL transport and fate in the subsurface. J Environ Manag 204:748–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.015
Toumelin E, Torres-Verdín C (2005) Influence of oil saturation and wettability on rock resistivity measurements: a uniform pore-scale approach. SPWLA 46th Annual Logging Symposium. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts
Tsourlos P, Ogilvy R, Papazachos C, Meldrum P (2011) Measurement and inversion schemes for single borehole-to-surface electrical resistivity tomography surveys. J Geophys Eng 8:487–497(411). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/8/4/001
Waxman MH, Thomas EC (1974) Electrical conductivities in Shaly Sands-I. The relation between hydrocarbon saturation and resistivity index; II. The temperature coefficient of electrical conductivity. J Pet Technol 26:213–227. https://doi.org/10.2118/4094-ms
Weber WJ, Huang W (1996) A distributed reactivity model for sorption by soils and sediments. 4. Intraparticle heterogeneity and phase distribution relationships under nonequilibrium conditions. Environ Sci Technol 30:881–888. https://doi.org/10.1021/es950329y
Wilkinson PB, Chambers JE, Lelliott M, Wealthall GP, Ogilvy RD (2010) Extreme sensitivity of crosshole electrical resistivity tomography measurements to geometric errors. Geophys J Int 173:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2008.03725.x
Wu Y, Shuler P, Blanco M, Tang Y, Goddard W (2008) A study of wetting behavior and surfactant EOR in carbonates with model compounds. SPE J 13:26–34. https://doi.org/10.2118/99612-ms
Yeh TCJ, Zhu J (2007) Hydraulic/partitioning tracer tomography for characterization of dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zones. Water Resour Res 43:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006wr004877
Zhao J, Rijo L, Ward S (1986) Effects of geologic noise on cross-borehole electrical surveys. Geophysics 51:1978–1991. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442053
Zhou Y, Cardiff M (2017) Oscillatory hydraulic testing as a strategy for NAPL source zone monitoring: laboratory experiments. J Contam Hydrol 200:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.03.005
Zhou B, Greenhalgh SA (2000) Cross-hole resistivity tomography using different electrode configurations. Geophys Prospect 48:887–912. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00220.x
Acknowledgments
We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript. We thank Yizhen Niu and Xiangyi Shao for their great support in the research.
Funding
This research work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for development project of major scientific research instrument (Grant No. 41427803), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41772307), and National Key Research and Development Projects (Grant No. 2017YFC0307701).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shao, S., Guo, X. & Gao, C. Fresh underground light non-aqueous liquid (LNAPL) pollution source zone monitoring in an outdoor experiment using cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 18316–18328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05039-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05039-8